FindAlternative
Back to Aiven

Aiven vs Heroku Postgres

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Aiven
AivenManaged open-source data infrastructure on leading cloud providers.
Heroku Postgres
Heroku PostgresFully managed, scalable SQL database service built seamlessly for Heroku developers.
Overview
Description

Aiven is a managed cloud data platform that deploys and operates popular open-source data technologies on major cloud providers. It simplifies database management, streaming, and caching for developers and enterprises. The platform handles routine administrative tasks such as automated backups, security patching, and scaling, allowing engineering teams to focus on building applications rather than managing infrastructure.

Heroku Postgres is a reliable, fully managed database-as-a-service offering built on the powerful PostgreSQL object-relational database system. It abstracts away the operational overhead of database management, allowing engineering teams to focus entirely on building and scaling application features. Deeply integrated into the Heroku ecosystem, the service provides seamless provisioning, automated backups, credential management, and straightforward scaling options. It empowers developers to maintain secure, high-performance data infrastructure without manual server administration.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Managed SQL Databases
Managed SQL Databases
Best for
Developers and enterprise engineering teams
Developers and growing teams
Specifications
free tier
Yes
No
uptime sla
99.99%
99.95%
datacenter regions
Global across AWS, GCP, Azure, and others
US, EU
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Supports a wide array of popular open-source data technologies
  • Deployable across multiple major cloud service providers
  • Simplifies complex database administration and scaling tasks
  • Provides robust enterprise security and compliance standards
  • Deep native integration with the Heroku platform and ecosystem
  • Zero operational overhead for provisioning and infrastructure maintenance
  • Convenient database branching and follower setup via CLI
  • Reliable automated backup and point-in-time recovery features
Cons
  • Pricing can become high for large production workloads
  • Limited customization compared to self-hosted database deployments
  • Advanced support tiers require higher subscription levels
  • Can become expensive compared to running raw cloud provider databases directly
  • Tied closely to the Heroku ecosystem, making external migration more complex
  • Limited granular configuration access compared to self-hosted PostgreSQL instances
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Aiven

View all →
Heroku Postgres
Heroku Postgres

Fully managed, scalable SQL database service built seamlessly for Heroku developers.

Compare
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
DigitalOcean Managed Databases

Worry-free fully managed database hosting for modern cloud applications.

Compare
Oracle Cloud Database Services
Oracle Cloud Database Services

Comprehensive, autonomous, and high-performance cloud database solutions for any workload.

Compare

Alternatives to Heroku Postgres

View all →
ElephantSQL
ElephantSQL

Fully managed PostgreSQL databases in the cloud

Compare
Neon
Neon

Serverless Postgres with database branching and scale-to-zero compute

Compare
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
DigitalOcean Managed Databases

Worry-free fully managed database hosting for modern cloud applications.

Compare
ScaleWay Database
ScaleWay Database

Fully managed PostgreSQL and MySQL databases deployed in seconds.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Aiven offers broader cloud flexibility and more open‑source services with a slightly higher SLA, while Heroku Postgres provides tighter Heroku integration but less regional coverage and a lower SLA.

Key differences

  • Aiven runs on AWS, GCP, Azure and other clouds globally; Heroku Postgres is limited to US and EU datacenters.
  • Aiven supports many open‑source data technologies; Heroku Postgres is PostgreSQL‑only.
  • Heroku Postgres includes built‑in database forks and followers for rapid testing; Aiven does not list equivalent branching features.
  • Aiven’s SLA is 99.99% vs. Heroku Postgres’s 99.95% uptime guarantee.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are paid subscriptions, but Heroku Postgres lacks a free tier and can be pricey; Aiven also gets costly at scale, but offers a free tier.

Heroku Postgres

Uptime & reliability

Aiven guarantees 99.99% SLA, higher than Heroku Postgres’s 99.95% SLA.

Aiven

Performance

Both provide automated backups, point‑in‑time recovery, and encryption; no performance benchmarks are given.

Tie

Developer experience

Heroku Postgres offers CLI/database forks and seamless env‑var integration, simplifying dev workflows on Heroku.

Heroku Postgres

Regions & compliance

Aiven spans global regions across AWS, GCP, Azure; Heroku Postgres is limited to US and EU.

Aiven

Support

Both require higher subscription tiers for advanced support; no detailed support level comparison provided.

Tie

Lock‑in

Heroku Postgres is tightly coupled to the Heroku platform, making migration harder; Aiven is multi‑cloud and less vendor‑specific.

Heroku Postgres

Choose Aiven if…

Enterprises needing multi‑cloud, global coverage and diverse open‑source data services.

Choose Heroku Postgres if…

Teams already on Heroku that value instant DB forks and deep platform integration.

Common questions

Can I run non‑PostgreSQL databases with Heroku Postgres?

No. Heroku Postgres only supports PostgreSQL; Aiven offers many open‑source data technologies.

What regions are available for each service?

Aiven provides global regions across AWS, GCP, Azure; Heroku Postgres is limited to US and EU datacenters.

Which service has the higher uptime guarantee?

Aiven guarantees 99.99% uptime, while Heroku Postgres guarantees 99.95%.