FindAlternative
Back to BigML

BigML vs Flowise

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
BigML
BigMLMachine Learning Made Easy
Flowise
FlowiseBuild AI Agents, Visually
Overview
Description

BigML is a cloud-based platform for building, training, and deploying machine learning models. It provides a simple and intuitive interface for data scientists and developers to create and deploy machine learning models at scale.

Flowise is an open-source visual builder for LLM applications and AI agents. Its drag-and-drop canvas composes chatflows and agentflows from components such as models, prompts, vector stores, tools, and memory, which can then be exposed through an API, an embeddable chat widget, or the built-in chat UI. Flowise orchestrates existing models rather than training them.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Freemium

Self-hosting the open-source project is free. Flowise Cloud is tiered: Free $0/month (2 flows & assistants, 100 predictions/month, 5MB storage), Starter $35/month (unlimited flows, 10,000 predictions/month, 1GB storage), and Pro $65/month (50,000 predictions/month, 10GB storage, unlimited workspaces, +$15/user/month beyond 5 users).

Category
Machine Learning
AI Productivity
Best for
Data Scientists and Developers
AI Enthusiasts and Developers
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Self-hosted
open source
No
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Live Chat, Documentation
Discord, GitHub Discussions
key integrations
AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Python, R
github stars
54,973
primary language
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Easy to use and intuitive interface
  • Scalable and flexible architecture
  • Collaborative features for team-based workflows
  • Automated machine learning workflows
  • Easy to use
  • No coding required
  • Fast development and deployment
  • Collaboration features
Cons
  • Limited support for certain types of machine learning algorithms
  • Can be expensive for large-scale deployments
  • Limited customization options for the user interface
  • Behaviour beyond the built-in nodes means writing your own integrations in the components package
  • Dependent on visual interface
  • Limited support for complex AI models
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to BigML

View all →
Label Studio
Label Studio

Multi-type data labeling and annotation tool

Compare
DataRobot
DataRobot

Automated machine learning platform

Compare
Amazon SageMaker
Amazon SageMaker

Build, train, and deploy machine learning models

Compare
IBM Watson Studio
IBM Watson Studio

Build, train, and deploy AI and machine learning models in the cloud

Compare

Alternatives to Flowise

View all →
BigML
BigML

Machine Learning Made Easy

Compare
Alteryx
Alteryx

Self-service data analytics platform for building and deploying machine learning models

Compare
next-ai-draw-io
next-ai-draw-io

AI‑enhanced diagramming directly in your browser

Compare
Budibase
Budibase

AI-powered automation and app builder

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Flowise is the low‑cost, open‑source visual AI‑agent builder ideal for developers who want self‑hosting and drag‑and‑drop flows, while BigML is a paid, cloud‑only platform focused on traditional machine‑learning model training and deployment.

Key differences

  • Flowise is open source and can be self‑hosted; BigML is a proprietary SaaS only.
  • Flowise targets LLM chatflows and agent pipelines; BigML focuses on classic ML algorithms and predictive analytics.
  • Pricing model: Flowise offers a free tier and cheap cloud plans; BigML requires a paid subscription with potentially higher cost at scale.
  • Flowise’s collaboration is via Discord/GitHub; BigML provides built‑in real‑time shared workspaces and live‑chat support.
  • Integration scope: Flowise connects LLMs, vector stores, and custom nodes; BigML integrates with AWS, Azure, GCP, Python, and R.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Flowise has a free self‑hosted option and low‑cost cloud tiers; BigML only offers paid subscriptions.

Flowise

Ease of use / learning curve

BigML’s UI is described as intuitive for classic ML; Flowise’s visual canvas is easy but advanced features require custom node coding.

BigML

Features & depth

Flowise supports LLM agents, memory, vector stores, and API/widget export; BigML lacks LLM‑specific capabilities.

Flowise

Integrations & ecosystem

BigML lists native integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP, Python, and R; Flowise relies on community nodes and custom code for extensions.

BigML

Collaboration

BigML provides real‑time shared workspaces; Flowise collaboration is limited to Discord/GitHub discussions.

BigML

Scalability

BigML is built as a cloud SaaS with scalable infrastructure; Flowise scalability depends on user‑managed hosting.

BigML

Support

BigML offers email, live chat, and documentation; Flowise support is community‑based via Discord and GitHub.

BigML

Choose BigML if…

Data scientists or teams needing a managed, scalable ML platform with built‑in collaboration and enterprise support.

Choose Flowise if…

Developers or AI enthusiasts needing free/self‑hosted LLM agent building with visual flow design.

Common questions

Can I run Flowise on my own servers?

Yes, Flowise is open source and can be self‑hosted on AWS, Azure, GCP, Digital Ocean, etc.

Does BigML support large language models?

Not specified; BigML focuses on traditional machine‑learning algorithms.

Which tool is cheaper for a small team starting out?

Flowise offers a free tier and low‑cost cloud plans, making it cheaper than BigML’s paid subscription.