Brutal: Paws of Fury vs WWF Attitude
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Across the world, invitations were delivered. Under the watchful eye of the great master Dali Llama, the world's greatest martial artists return to Brutal Island to battle for supremacy. Each combatant brings a unique mental and physical style, turning the tournament into a spectacular display of fighting skill. Players can experience both single‑player challenges and multiplayer bouts, mastering a roster of animal warriors and unlocking new moves as they strive to become the one true champion.
WWF Attitude brings the excitement of 1990s professional wrestling to your screen, featuring a roster of more than 40 iconic superstars like Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Rock, and The Undertaker. Customize move sets and costumes to craft a unique competitor and dominate the squared circle. The game supports both single‑player and split‑screen multiplayer, with two‑man commentary from Shane McMahon and Jerry "The King" Lawler adding authentic broadcast flavor. Perfect for fans of classic wrestling action and competitive couch co‑op.
- Unique animal fighter roster
- Classic retro graphics
- Both single‑player and multiplayer modes
- Deep combo system
- Large roster of iconic WWF stars
- Deep customization of wrestlers
- Two‑man commentary adds authenticity
- Split‑screen multiplayer for local competition
- Limited to PC platform
- DOS‑era controls may feel dated
- No online multiplayer support
- Graphics are dated by modern standards
- Limited to split‑screen, no online play
- AI can be inconsistent in difficulty
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Brutal: Paws of Fury
View all →
Alternatives to WWF Attitude
View all →
Step into the ring with iconic WWF superstars and unleash signature moves in fast‑paced action
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBrutal: Paws of Fury offers a cheap, retro‑style animal fighting experience on PC, while WWF Attitude provides a pricier, larger‑roster wrestling game with deep customization and split‑screen play.
Key differences
- •Roster size: Brutal has a small animal cast; WWF features over 40 licensed WWF superstars.
- •Customization: WWF lets you create and edit wrestlers; Brutal has fixed characters.
- •Price: Brutal costs $19.99; WWF costs $49.99.
- •Multiplayer style: Brutal supports up to two local players; WWF adds split‑screen couch multiplayer.
- •Graphics era: Brutal uses intentional mid‑90s pixel art; WWF’s graphics are dated by modern standards.
Gameplay & fun factor
WWF offers many match types, signature moves, and deep wrestler customization versus Brutal’s simpler combo system.
Platform availability
Both are PC titles; no other platforms are specified for either game.
Pricing & value
Brutal is $19.99, less than half WWF’s $49.99 price.
Multiplayer / co‑op
Both support local multiplayer only; WWF adds split‑screen, Brutal supports two players without split‑screen.
Content & replayability
WWF’s 40+ characters, customization, and multiple match modes give more replay value than Brutal’s limited roster.
Difficulty & accessibility
Brutal’s DOS‑era controls may feel dated; WWF’s AI difficulty is inconsistent—neither clearly superior.
Graphics & performance
Brutal’s intentional pixel‑art retro style is generally more cohesive than WWF’s generally dated graphics.
Choose Brutal: Paws of Fury if…
Buyers who want an inexpensive, retro‑styled fighting game for PC with simple local two‑player action.
Choose WWF Attitude if…
Buyers who want a richer wrestling experience, extensive roster, customization and split‑screen play, and are willing to pay more.
Common questions
Which game offers more characters?
WWF Attitude includes over 40 licensed WWF superstars, while Brutal: Paws of Fury has a small animal roster.
Can I play these games online?
No. Both titles only support local multiplayer; neither provides online play.
Is the price difference justified by the content?
WWF costs $49.99 and adds extensive roster, customization, and multiple match types; Brutal costs $19.99 with a smaller roster and simpler features.