FindAlternative
Back to CyberPanel

CyberPanel vs NPS

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
CyberPanel
CyberPanelFree, open-source hosting control panel built on OpenLiteSpeed for fast website management.
Visit
NPS
NPSLightweight Intranet Penetration Proxy Server
Visit
Overview
Description

CyberPanel is a free, open-source web hosting control panel for managing servers and websites, built on top of OpenLiteSpeed, which it advertises as up to 10x faster than Apache. It supports unlimited domains, one-click Let's Encrypt SSL, automated WordPress installs with staging and LiteSpeed Cache, and a full email server stack using Postfix, Dovecot, and Rspamd for spam filtering. It also includes a Docker manager for one-click app deployment (n8n, Redis, MongoDB, and more), ModSecurity WAF and firewall management, AI-powered malware scanning, and flexible backups to local, SFTP, S3, or Google Drive. CyberPanel's core panel is free forever, with optional paid add-ons for extended Apache compatibility and premium management tools.

nps is a powerful, lightweight, and high-performance intranet penetration proxy server. It supports various protocols such as TCP, UDP, SOCKS5, and HTTP, allowing for flexible and efficient traffic forwarding.

Pricing
Freemium
Free
Category
Server Management
Server Management
Best for
Self-hosters, agencies, and budget-conscious server admins
Developers and system administrators
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community, Forum
GitHub Issues
key integrations
WordPress, Docker, Let's Encrypt
—
github stars
—
34,138
primary language
—
Go
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Core panel is completely free and open source, unlike most commercial control panels
  • OpenLiteSpeed backend delivers strong performance for the price point
  • Broad feature set spanning web, email, security, and Docker app hosting in one panel
  • Active GitHub repository with public source code for transparency
  • High-performance and lightweight solution
  • Supports multiple protocols for flexible traffic forwarding
  • Easy to configure and manage
  • Free and open-source solution
Cons
  • Smaller ecosystem and community support base compared to long-established commercial panels
  • Some advanced compatibility (like .htaccess) requires a paid add-on
  • Self-managed install means the user is responsible for server security and updates
  • Limited documentation and support resources
  • May require technical expertise to set up and configure
  • Limited scalability and performance in large-scale deployments
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to CyberPanel

View all →
cPanel
cPanel

The industry-standard Linux hosting control panel for managing servers, accounts, and websites.

Compare
Plesk
Plesk

Hosting and server management platform that works across Linux and Windows, on-prem or in the cloud.

Compare
1Panel
1Panel

Open-source Linux server management panel for Docker, websites, databases, and AI agent deployment.

Compare
Webmin
Webmin

Free, open-source web-based control panel for administering Unix and Linux servers.

Compare

Alternatives to NPS

View all →
frp
frp

Fast, open-source reverse proxy for NAT traversal and firewall bypass

Compare
rathole
rathole

High-performance reverse proxy for NAT traversal

Compare
nginx
nginx

High-performance web server and reverse proxy

Compare
NATS Server
NATS Server

High-Performance server for NATS.io

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

NPS is a free, lightweight proxy focused on intranet penetration with minimal UI, while CyberPanel is a freemium hosting control panel offering web, email, and Docker management.

Key differences

  • •NPS handles generic TCP/UDP/SOCKS5/HTTP(S) traffic forwarding; CyberPanel manages web hosting, email, and container apps.
  • •NPS is a single‑purpose proxy server; CyberPanel is a full control panel with many services.
  • •NPS is pure open‑source with GitHub‑only support; CyberPanel adds paid features and community forums.
  • •NPS requires technical setup and offers limited scalability; CyberPanel provides one‑click tools but may need paid add‑ons for advanced configs.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

NPS is completely free and open‑source; CyberPanel uses a freemium model with paid add‑ons for some features.

NPS

Ease of use / learning curve

CyberPanel offers one‑click installers, UI dashboards, and Docker manager; NPS relies on manual config via web terminal.

CyberPanel

Features & depth

CyberPanel includes web server, email stack, SSL, WAF, malware scanning, and Docker; NPS provides only proxy and traffic monitoring.

CyberPanel

Integrations & ecosystem

CyberPanel integrates WordPress, Docker, Let's Encrypt, email services; NPS lists only API and basic protocol support.

CyberPanel

Support

CyberPanel offers community forums and broader user base; NPS support limited to GitHub Issues.

CyberPanel

Scalability

CyberPanel designed for multi‑site hosting; NPS notes limited scalability for large deployments.

CyberPanel

Choose CyberPanel if…

Self‑hosters or agencies wanting an all‑in‑one web/email/Docker control panel with UI tools, even if some features require paid add‑ons.

Choose NPS if…

Developers needing a free, high‑performance proxy for internal network access and comfortable with manual setup.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either product?

NPS is completely free; CyberPanel is freemium—core panel free, but some advanced features require payment.

Can either tool replace a full web hosting stack?

CyberPanel provides web server, email, SSL, WAF, and Docker, acting as a full hosting stack; NPS only forwards traffic.

What level of support can I expect?

NPS support is limited to GitHub Issues; CyberPanel offers community forums and broader user assistance.