FindAlternative
Back to Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)

Equinix Metal (formerly Packet) vs Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Heads up: Equinix Metal (formerly Packet) and Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage are in different categories and aren't listed as alternatives — this comparison may not be meaningful.
Compare
Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)
Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)Bare metal servers on demand with instant provisioning
Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage
Wasabi Hot Cloud StorageS3-compatible object storage at a flat rate
Overview
Description

Equinix Metal provides automated, on‑demand bare metal infrastructure that can be deployed in seconds across global data centers. It combines the performance of dedicated hardware with the flexibility of cloud APIs, allowing developers to run any workload without virtualization overhead. The platform integrates with major cloud providers and orchestration tools, offering programmable networking, IPMI access, and a pay‑as‑you‑go pricing model. It is ideal for latency‑sensitive applications, high‑performance computing, and workloads that require full control over the hardware stack.

Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is a cloud storage solution that provides S3-compatible object storage at a flat rate, with no egress or API request fees. This makes it an attractive option for businesses and organizations that need to store large amounts of data in the cloud without incurring additional costs.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Cloud Compute
Object & Block Storage
Best for
Enterprises and developers needing dedicated hardware
Enterprises and large organizations
Specifications
free tier
No
No
uptime sla
99.99%
99.99%
datacenter regions
US, Canada, EU, APAC
US, EU, APAC
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • True bare metal performance without hypervisor overhead
  • Global data center footprint for low latency
  • Extensive API and IaC support
  • Pay‑as‑you‑go pricing with per‑hour billing
  • Flat rate pricing with no additional fees
  • High durability and availability
  • S3-compatible APIs and tools
  • Secure environment with encryption and access controls
Cons
  • Higher cost compared to shared cloud VMs for small workloads
  • Limited managed services; requires more ops expertise
  • No free tier for long‑term testing
  • Limited scalability and performance
  • No free tier or trial available
  • Limited support for certain file types and formats
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Equinix Metal (formerly Packet)

View all →
Leaseweb
Leaseweb

Global bare-metal and dedicated servers backed by a massive owned network.

Compare
Vultr
Vultr

High-performance cloud compute and bare metal hosting worldwide.

Compare
phoenixNAP
phoenixNAP

Global bare metal cloud and dedicated server infrastructure

Compare
Hivelocity
Hivelocity

Bare-metal dedicated servers and colocation hosting

Compare

Alternatives to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

View all →
Backblaze
Backblaze

Cloud backup and object storage services for individuals and businesses.

Compare