FindAlternative
Back to ExpressVPN

ExpressVPN vs UpGuard

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Heads up: ExpressVPN and UpGuard are in different categories and aren't listed as alternatives — this comparison may not be meaningful.
Compare
ExpressVPN
ExpressVPNFast, easy-to-use VPN with a large server network.
UpGuard
UpGuardCyber risk platform for vendor risk, attack surface, and third-party security monitoring
Overview
Description

ExpressVPN is a premium consumer VPN known for fast speeds, a large global server network, and a very easy setup, with an audited no-logs policy. It is a mainstream, polished choice.

UpGuard is a cyber risk posture management platform that helps organizations identify and reduce security risk across their vendor relationships, attack surface, and internal workforce. It continuously scans a company's external digital footprint to surface exposed assets, misconfigurations, and vulnerabilities, and produces security ratings that can be used to benchmark and monitor third-party vendors over time. The platform is used by over 45,000 companies across financial services, healthcare, technology, and education, and includes a Trust Exchange feature that automates security questionnaire handling between organizations and their vendors. Additional modules cover user risk management, including shadow AI usage monitoring, with automation workflows for discovery, notification, and remediation driven through its API.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)

No free tier; plans around $6.67–$12.95/month depending on term.

Contact for Pricing
Category
VPN Services
Security Auditing
Best for
Mainstream VPN users
Security and risk teams managing vendor and attack surface risk
Specifications
platforms
Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android
deployment
Desktop App
Cloud/SaaS
open source
No
No
api available
No
Yes
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fast and reliable
  • Very easy to use
  • Large server network
  • Good for streaming
  • Combines vendor risk, attack surface, and user risk monitoring in one platform
  • Trust Exchange automates a historically manual security questionnaire process
  • Established vendor with a large customer base across regulated industries
  • API-driven automation supports integration into existing security workflows
Cons
  • No free tier
  • Pricier than rivals
  • Fewer power-user features
  • No pricing information is published; all plans require contacting sales
  • Feature depth is aimed at mid-market and enterprise organizations, likely overkill for very small teams
  • Evaluating fit requires a demo since capabilities are not fully detailed publicly
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
7
0
User rating
4.5 (4)
Not enough data

What reviewers say

ExpressVPN Reviews

4.5 (4)
Verified User

Great vpn

We rolled out ExpressVPN last quarter. Good for streaming. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Verified User

Great vpn

We rolled out ExpressVPN last quarter. Fast and reliable. Minor gripe: no free tier. Would recommend.

Verified User

Great vpn

Been using ExpressVPN for a while. Very easy to use. Minor gripe: no free tier. Would recommend.

Read all reviews →

UpGuard Reviews

No reviews yet.

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to ExpressVPN

View all →
Proton VPN
Proton VPN

Privacy-focused VPN from the makers of Proton Mail.

Compare
NordVPN
NordVPN

A fast, secure VPN with a large global server network.

Compare
frp
frp

Fast, open-source reverse proxy for NAT traversal and firewall bypass

Compare
TunnelBear
TunnelBear

Secure and private browsing with a user-friendly VPN

Compare

Alternatives to UpGuard

View all →
Intruder
Intruder

Cloud-based exposure management platform for continuous vulnerability scanning.

Compare
Qualys
Qualys

Cloud-based platform for vulnerability management, detection, and compliance.

Compare
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus

Vulnerability assessment scanner that finds, prioritizes, and helps remediate security weaknesses.

Compare
Check Point Next Generation Firewall
Check Point Next Generation Firewall

Unified security gateway with threat prevention and zero‑trust controls

Compare