FindAlternative
Back to Far Manager

Far Manager vs filebrowser

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Far Manager
Far ManagerPowerful console file manager for Windows power users
Visit
filebrowser
filebrowserSelf‑hosted web file manager for individuals and small teams
Visit
Overview
Description

Far Manager is a dual-pane, text‑based file manager that runs in the Windows console. It provides extensive keyboard shortcuts, customizable panels, and a rich plugin ecosystem for advanced file operations. The program is free, open‑source, and supports archive handling, FTP, and scripting, making it ideal for developers, sysadmins, and anyone who prefers a fast, keyboard‑driven interface over graphical file explorers.

Filebrowser is an open‑source, web‑based file manager that you can run on any server. It provides a clean UI for browsing, uploading, and sharing files without needing a desktop client. Designed for simplicity, it lets users manage directories, set permissions, and generate shareable links directly from the browser, making collaboration easy for small groups.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
File Managers
File Managers
Best for
Power users and IT professionals
Individuals and small teams
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community forums, GitHub issues
Community support
key integrations
FTP, SFTP, external editors
—
github stars
—
35,684
primary language
—
Go
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully keyboard driven for maximum speed
  • Extensive plugin ecosystem
  • Free and open source
  • Handles many archive formats natively
  • Fully open‑source and free to use
  • Easy to self‑host with Docker or binary
  • Simple UI suitable for non‑technical users
  • Fine‑grained permission controls
Cons
  • Windows‑only, no native macOS or Linux version
  • Steep learning curve for newcomers
  • Limited graphical preview capabilities
  • Limited advanced collaboration features compared to SaaS solutions
  • No built‑in real‑time editing of documents
  • Community support only, no guaranteed SLA
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Far Manager

View all →

No alternatives listed yet. Browse similar tools →

Alternatives to filebrowser

View all →
GreaterWMS
GreaterWMS

Inventory management system for efficient logistics

Compare
cloudreve
cloudreve

Self‑hosted cloud storage for individuals and small teams

Compare
File.io
File.io

Super simple, anonymous, and secure file sharing with auto-deletion.

Compare
Nextcloud
Nextcloud

Safe home for all your data

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Far Manager is a free, keyboard‑centric Windows console file manager with deep plugin support, while filebrowser is a free, self‑hosted web UI for Linux with simple multi‑user sharing.

Key differences

  • •Platform: Far Manager runs only on Windows desktop; filebrowser runs on any Linux server via binary or Docker.
  • •Interface: Far Manager is console‑based, keyboard‑driven; filebrowser provides a graphical web UI for non‑technical users.
  • •Extensibility: Far Manager offers a robust plugin API for editors, archive handling, etc.; filebrowser offers a REST API and theming but fewer native plugins.
  • •Collaboration: filebrowser includes user accounts, granular permissions, and public link generation; Far Manager lacks built‑in multi‑user collaboration features.
  • •Deployment & scalability: Far Manager is a local desktop app; filebrowser is self‑hosted and can scale across servers via Docker.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost advantage.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

filebrowser’s web UI is intuitive for non‑technical users; Far Manager’s console UI has a steep learning curve.

filebrowser

Features & depth

Far Manager provides extensive keyboard shortcuts, archive handling, FTP/SFTP, and a rich plugin ecosystem.

Far Manager

Integrations & ecosystem

Far Manager has a robust plugin API and integrates with external editors, FTP/SFTP; filebrowser offers a REST API but fewer native integrations.

Far Manager

Collaboration

filebrowser supports multiple user accounts, granular permissions, and public link sharing; Far Manager lacks these features.

filebrowser

Scalability

filebrowser can be deployed on any Linux server or Docker, scaling beyond a single workstation; Far Manager is limited to one Windows desktop.

filebrowser

Support

Both rely on community support (forums, GitHub issues) with no guaranteed SLA.

Tie

Choose Far Manager if…

Power users needing fast, keyboard‑driven file operations on Windows with plugin extensibility.

Choose filebrowser if…

Teams or individuals needing web‑based, multi‑user file sharing on Linux with easy self‑hosting.

Common questions

Can I use either tool on macOS or Linux?

Far Manager is Windows‑only; filebrowser runs on any Linux server (binary or Docker) but not on macOS directly.

Which solution supports granular user permissions and public sharing links?

filebrowser provides multiple user accounts, fine‑grained read/write controls, and temporary or permanent public links.

Do both tools offer APIs for automation?

Yes. Far Manager has a plugin API; filebrowser includes a RESTful API for external automation.