FindAlternative
Back to Final Fantasy III (2006)

Final Fantasy III (2006) vs Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Final Fantasy III (2006)
Final Fantasy III (2006)Classic JRPG reborn with modern twists and deep job system.
Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon
Fire Emblem: Shadow DragonLead Marth and his loyal army in a classic tactical turn-based fantasy warfare adventure.
Overview
Description

Final Fantasy III delivers a timeless role‑playing experience, featuring a robust job system that lets players customize their party's abilities. The story follows four heroes on a quest to restore balance to a world threatened by darkness. The 2006 remake enhances the original with vibrant graphics, refined turn‑based combat, and expanded side quests, offering both nostalgic fans and new players an engaging adventure across an open world.

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon is a faithful remake of the Famicom classic that brings tactical role-playing depth to the Nintendo DS. Players assume the role of Prince Marth as he embarks on an epic quest to reclaim his homeland of Altea and defeat the evil Shadow Dragon, Medeus. The game introduces refined mechanics, including the ability to reclass units into entirely different character classes to drastically alter your tactical approach on the battlefield. With unforgiving permadeath and deep strategic gameplay, it serves as a defining entry for both veterans and newcomers to the tactical RPG genre.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
JRPG
JRPG
Best for
RPG fans and nostalgic players
Tactical RPG fans and strategy gamers
Specifications
General
msrp
$19.9943%
$34.99
release date
2006-08-24
2008-08-07
Specifications
developer
Matrix Software
Nintendo SPD Production Group No. 2, Intelligent Systems
publisher
Square Enix
Nintendo
age rating
PEGI 12, ESRB E10++71%
PEGI 7, ESRB E10+
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
critic score
64/100
83/100+30%
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Rich job system with extensive customization
  • Engaging turn‑based combat
  • Beautiful retro‑style visuals
  • High replay value with multiple endings
  • Faithful and polished remake of the NES original
  • Introduction of the flexible character reclassing system
  • Deep, rewarding tactical turn-based combat mechanics
  • Engaging fantasy storyline with iconic series characters
Cons
  • Occasional pacing issues in early chapters
  • Limited multiplayer features
  • Some side quests feel repetitive
  • Presentation and graphics feel dated compared to later entries
  • Permadeath can be overly punishing for genre newcomers
  • Multiplayer features are limited by platform constraints
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Final Fantasy III (2006)

View all →
Final Fantasy VIII
Final Fantasy VIII

A timeless love story set against a war-torn world of magic and technology

Compare
Final Fantasy V
Final Fantasy V

Master the Job System in a classic fantasy adventure.

Compare
Final Fantasy XII
Final Fantasy XII

Epic political intrigue meets vast open‑world adventure.

Compare
Final Fantasy IX
Final Fantasy IX

A classic fantasy RPG adventure with memorable characters and a timeless story.

Compare

Alternatives to Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon

View all →
Fire Emblem
Fire Emblem

Lead an army of heroes in classic tactical turn-based warfare.

Compare
Fire Emblem: Shin Monshou no Nazo - Hikari to Kage no Eiyuu
Fire Emblem: Shin Monshou no Nazo - Hikari to Kage no Eiyuu

Lead Marth and your army to save Akaneia in this classic tactical RPG.

Compare
BS Fire Emblem: Archanea Senki-hen
BS Fire Emblem: Archanea Senki-hen

A broadcast tactical RPG exploring pivotal prequel events in the Archanea universe.

Compare
Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones
Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones

Lead young royals through tactical battles in a war-torn continent.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon offers deeper tactical combat and higher critical acclaim at a higher price, while Final Fantasy III provides a cheaper, classic JRPG experience with strong job customization.

Key differences

  • Combat style: grid‑based tactical vs. traditional JRPG turn‑based battles
  • Price: $34.99 vs. $19.99
  • Critical reception: 83/100 vs. 64/100
  • Core focus: permanent‑death tactical strategy vs. job‑system character customization
  • Graphics era: 2008 remake with dated visuals vs. 2006 pixel‑art with modern polish
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

A delivers tactical grid combat and reclassing, praised for depth; B offers standard JRPG combat.

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon

Platform availability

Both list single‑player and multiplayer; no specific platform differences provided.

Tie

Price & value

B costs $19.99, $15 less than A's $34.99, offering lower entry cost.

Final Fantasy III (2006)

Multiplayer / co‑op

A includes wireless multiplayer for tactical battles; B only notes limited multiplayer.

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon

Content & replayability

A’s permadeath and diverse unit roster boost replay value; B relies on multiple endings.

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon

Difficulty & accessibility

B’s difficulty is moderate; A’s permadeath can be punishing for newcomers.

Final Fantasy III (2006)

Graphics & performance

B’s hand‑drawn pixel art is described as modern polish; A’s graphics feel dated.

Final Fantasy III (2006)

Choose Final Fantasy III (2006) if…

Players seeking classic JRPG feel, job customization, and lower cost.

Choose Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon if…

Tactical‑strategy fans willing to pay more for depth and higher reviews.

Common questions

Which game is cheaper?

Final Fantasy III costs $19.99; Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon costs $34.99.

Which title has better critical reception?

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon has a critic score of 83/100, compared to 64/100 for Final Fantasy III.

Do both games support multiplayer?

Both list multiplayer; Fire Emblem offers wireless tactical battles, while Final Fantasy III’s multiplayer is limited.