FindAlternative
Back to FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal Camera

FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal Camera vs Uniview IPC3624SR‑P

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal Camera
FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal CameraThermal security camera with built‑in AI analytics for human and vehicle detection
Uniview IPC3624SR‑P
Uniview IPC3624SR‑PCompact 4MP bullet camera with built‑in IR and PoE power
Overview
Description

The FLIR FC‑Series ID delivers high‑resolution thermal imaging combined with on‑board video analytics that can automatically classify human and vehicular intrusions. Its modular lens options and multiple resolution settings let installers tailor the system to any perimeter, from tight urban sites to wide‑area fences. Designed for rugged outdoor deployment, the camera offers IP66 protection, PoE power, and a suite of integration options for existing VMS platforms. The FC‑Series ID reduces false alarms and simplifies monitoring, making it ideal for critical infrastructure, campuses, and border security.

The Uniview IPC3624SR‑P is a rugged, weather‑sealed bullet camera designed for outdoor surveillance. It delivers crystal‑clear 4‑megapixel video and features built‑in infrared LEDs for night vision up to 30 meters. With PoE support and advanced video analytics, this camera integrates easily into existing IP security systems, providing reliable performance in harsh environments while minimizing installation complexity.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Category
IP & Security Cameras
IP & Security Cameras
Best for
Security integrators and critical‑infrastructure owners
Security installers and small‑business owners
Specifications
Specifications
weight
0.9 kg
350 g+38789%
warranty
2 years limited
2 years
dimensions
115 x 115 x 140 mm
115 x 115 x 95 mm
open source
No
No
connectivity
PoE (802.3af/at), Ethernet 10/100/1000, optional Wi‑Fi via external adapter
Ethernet (PoE), 802.11 Wi‑Fi (optional via external adapter)
power source
PoE
PoE
General
msrp
$199
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Highly accurate AI classification reduces false alarms
  • Robust IP66 housing for harsh environments
  • PoE simplifies power and network cabling
  • Flexible lens and resolution options
  • High‑resolution 4MP image quality
  • Integrated IR for reliable night vision
  • Simple PoE installation
  • Robust IP66 weatherproof design
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost compared to basic thermal cameras
  • Limited to on‑board analytics; no customizable AI model training
  • Requires PoE switch or injector for power
  • Limited to fixed focus lens
  • No built‑in SD card slot for local storage
  • Advanced analytics require separate license
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal Camera

View all →
Parrot Anafi USA
Parrot Anafi USA

Secure, high-end American-made drone built for enterprise and first responders.

Compare
Autel EVO II
Autel EVO II

High-performance foldable drone featuring interchangeable camera payloads and long flight times.

Compare

Alternatives to Uniview IPC3624SR‑P

View all →
Reolink RLC-811A
Reolink RLC-811A

4K PoE camera with 5× optical zoom and AI person/vehicle detection.

Compare
Dahua IPC-HDW3549T1-AS
Dahua IPC-HDW3549T1-AS

5MP WizSense Network Camera with advanced perimeter protection.

Compare
Lorex 4K Ultra HD Security Camera
Lorex 4K Ultra HD Security Camera

Crystal‑clear 4K video with night vision and AI motion alerts

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The FLIR FC‑Series ID offers AI‑driven thermal detection for high‑security sites, while the Uniview IPC3624SR‑P provides high‑resolution visual imaging for general surveillance at lower cost.

Key differences

  • Detection type: FLIR uses thermal AI to detect humans/vehicles up to 200 m; Uniview relies on visible‑light 4MP imaging with IR only to 30 m.
  • Analytics: FLIR’s on‑board AI classification (98 % accuracy) vs. Uniview’s basic motion/line‑crossing requiring extra license for advanced analytics.
  • Lens flexibility: FLIR supports interchangeable lenses and multiple resolutions; Uniview has a fixed‑focus lens.
  • Price: FLIR pricing unknown (likely higher) vs. Uniview MSRP $199.
  • Power & cabling: Both use PoW, but FLIR requires PoE switch/injector; Uniview also PoE but same requirement.
DimensionWinner

Performance

FLIR detects humans up to 150 m and vehicles up to 200 m with AI; Uniview limited to 30 m IR and visual range.

FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal Camera

Build quality

Both have IP66 enclosures and operate from –30 °C; FLIR weight 0.9 kg, Uniview 0.35 kg but enclosure rating equal.

Tie

Connectivity

Both support PoE Ethernet and optional Wi‑Fi via external adapter; no functional difference.

Tie

Power & efficiency

Both powered solely by PoE; FLIR offers 802.3af/at, Uniview just PoE (same cable).

Tie

Compatibility

Both support ONVIF/RTSP streaming for third‑party NVRs; integration parity.

Tie

Price & value

Uniview lists MSRP $199; FLIR price not disclosed and likely higher, reducing value for budget buyers.

Uniview IPC3624SR‑P

Warranty & support

Both provide 2‑year limited warranties.

Tie

Choose FLIR FC‑Series ID Thermal Camera if…

Security integrators needing AI thermal detection for perimeter protection.

Choose Uniview IPC3624SR‑P if…

Small‑business owners wanting affordable high‑resolution visual surveillance.

Common questions

What is the detection range for each camera?

FLIR detects humans up to 150 m and vehicles up to 200 m; Uniview IR night vision reaches 30 m, visual range depends on lighting.

Can I use the cameras without a PoE switch?

Both require PoE; you need a PoE switch or injector for power and data.

Is advanced analytics included?

FLIR includes on‑board AI classification; Uniview’s advanced analytics need a separate license.