FindAlternative
Back to FUXA

FUXA vs Nagios XI

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
FUXA
FUXAWeb‑based SCADA/HMI dashboard for real‑time process visualization
Nagios XI
Nagios XIComprehensive IT monitoring platform for proactive infrastructure management
Overview
Description

FUXA is an open‑source, web‑based platform that lets engineers and operators create interactive visualizations of industrial processes. It supports real‑time data acquisition, alarm handling, and custom widget design without requiring proprietary hardware. The system runs in any modern browser, can be self‑hosted on‑premise, and integrates with common PLCs, MQTT brokers, and OPC-UA servers, making it suitable for factories, utilities, and IoT deployments.

Nagios XI delivers enterprise‑grade monitoring for servers, networks, applications, and services. Its web‑based interface lets IT teams visualize health, set thresholds, and receive alerts in real time. Built for self‑hosted deployment, Nagios XI integrates with ITSM tools, CMDBs, and cloud platforms, offering customizable dashboards and extensive reporting to keep systems running smoothly.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Monitoring & Logging
Monitoring & Logging
Best for
Industrial engineers and automation teams
IT Teams and System Administrators
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
No
github stars
4,797
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community forum, GitHub Issues
Email, Phone, 24/7 Support
key integrations
OPC-UA, MQTT, Modbus TCP
ITSM tools, CMDBs, and cloud platforms
primary language
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open‑source and free to use
  • Runs in any modern web browser
  • Extensible with custom widgets and scripts
  • Supports multiple industrial protocols
  • Highly customizable with thousands of plugins
  • Robust alerting and escalation workflows
  • Comprehensive reporting and dashboards
  • Self‑hosted deployment gives full data control
Cons
  • Self‑hosting requires technical setup
  • Limited out‑of‑the‑box mobile app support
  • Community support may be slower than commercial vendors
  • Steeper learning curve for initial setup
  • User interface can feel dated compared to newer SaaS tools
  • Limited out‑of‑the‑box mobile app support
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to FUXA

View all →
Grafana
Grafana

Composable observability platform

Compare
Serial-Studio
Serial-Studio

Open-source telemetry dashboard for UART, BLE, MQTT, Modbus, CAN and more.

Compare

Alternatives to Nagios XI

View all →
Riverbed Network Performance Management
Riverbed Network Performance Management

Real‑time visibility and optimization for enterprise networks.

Compare
ManageEngine OpManager
ManageEngine OpManager

Comprehensive network monitoring and management for IT teams

Compare
PRTG Network Monitor
PRTG Network Monitor

All‑in‑one network monitoring for IT pros and sysadmins

Compare
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor

Real-time network visibility and performance monitoring for IT pros.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

FUXA is a free, open‑source SCADA/HMI dashboard focused on industrial data, while Nagios XI is a paid, enterprise‑grade IT monitoring platform with extensive plugins and support.

Key differences

  • Domain focus: FUXA targets industrial PLC/OPC‑UA/MQTT data; Nagios XI targets IT hosts, services, and applications.
  • Cost model: FUXA is free and open source; Nagios XI requires a subscription.
  • Ecosystem breadth: Nagios XI offers thousands of plugins and ITSM/CMDB integrations; FUXA provides a limited set of industrial protocol connectors.
  • Support: Nagios XI includes 24/7 commercial support; FUXA relies on community forums and GitHub issues.
  • Mobile/HA features: Nagios XI has built‑in high‑availability clustering; FUXA has limited out‑of‑the‑box mobile support.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

FUXA is free and open source; Nagios XI requires a paid subscription.

FUXA

Ease of use / learning curve

FUXA needs technical self‑hosting but has a simpler drag‑and‑drop UI; Nagios XI is noted for a steeper learning curve.

FUXA

Features & depth

Nagios XI provides extensive plugin library, reporting engine, HA clustering; FUXA offers core SCADA/HMI functions only.

Nagios XI

Integrations & ecosystem

Nagios XI integrates with ITSM, CMDB, cloud platforms and thousands of plugins; FUXA supports OPC‑UA, MQTT, Modbus TCP only.

Nagios XI

Support

Nagios XI offers email, phone, 24/7 commercial support; FUXA relies on community forum and GitHub issues.

Nagios XI

Scalability

Nagios XI includes high‑availability clustering; FUXA has no built‑in HA features.

Nagios XI

Migration / lock‑in

FUXA is open source with export options, minimizing lock‑in; Nagios XI is proprietary and subscription‑based.

FUXA

Choose FUXA if…

Industrial engineers needing a free, open‑source SCADA/HMI dashboard for PLC and MQTT data.

Choose Nagios XI if…

IT teams requiring enterprise‑grade monitoring, extensive plugins, and commercial support.

Common questions

What are the cost differences?

FUXA is free and open source; Nagios XI requires a paid subscription with commercial support.

Can either solution run on mobile devices out of the box?

Both have limited native mobile app support; they run in a browser but lack dedicated mobile apps.

Is there a risk of vendor lock‑in with either product?

FUXA is open source and exportable, reducing lock‑in; Nagios XI is proprietary, so migration may be more difficult.