Gcore vs KeyCDN
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Gcore provides a worldwide content delivery network with over 210 points of presence and a 200+ Tbps backbone, ensuring rapid content delivery and low latency for users across the globe. The platform offers easy integration, real‑time analytics, and a free starter tier for developers and small sites. Beyond static assets, Gcore supports video streaming, edge computing, and DDoS protection, making it suitable for media companies, SaaS providers, and enterprises that need reliable, high‑performance edge services.
KeyCDN is a high-performance content delivery network designed to accelerate digital content distribution globally. It helps websites, software, and media stream faster to users by caching content closer to their physical locations. Built for developers and businesses of all sizes, the platform offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model with instant zone setup, robust security features, and comprehensive real-time analytics to optimize web performance.
- Extensive global PoP network
- Low average latency
- Integrated DDoS protection
- Generous free tier for testing
- Pay-as-you-go pricing with no monthly minimums
- Intuitive and user-friendly control panel
- Fast and responsive global edge network
- Robust API and automated SSL integration
- Advanced edge compute requires additional configuration
- Pricing for high traffic can become complex
- Support response times may vary on the free tier
- Lacks advanced edge worker capabilities found in some competitors
- Support is primarily ticket-based without 24/7 phone options
- Basic reporting compared to enterprise-grade analytics suites
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Gcore
View all →
Alternatives to KeyCDN
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataKeyCDN offers pay‑as‑you‑go pricing with a strong global edge and simple UI, while Gcore provides a free tier, larger PoP count, and built‑in DDoS protection but a more complex pricing model.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: KeyCDN is subscription‑based pay‑as‑you‑go; Gcore has a freemium tier with limited free bandwidth.
- •Edge compute: Gcore includes edge compute functions; KeyCDN does not.
- •Uptime SLA: KeyCDN guarantees 99.9%; Gcore guarantees 99.99%.
- •Network size: Gcore lists >210 PoPs; KeyCDN describes a global network without a specific PoP count.
- •DDoS protection: Gcore advertises built‑in mitigation; KeyCDN only mentions basic security controls.
Pricing & value
Gcore offers a free starter tier (10 GB bandwidth, 5 TB transfer); KeyCDN has no free tier.
Uptime & reliability
Gcore SLA is 99.99% vs KeyCDN's 99.9% availability guarantee.
Performance
Gcore cites average latency of 30 ms and 200+ Tbps capacity; KeyCDN only notes fast global edge.
Developer experience
KeyCDN provides an intuitive UI, robust REST API, and automated SSL; Gcore’s edge compute needs extra configuration.
Regions & compliance
Gcore lists PoPs in Middle East and Africa explicitly; KeyCDN mentions global coverage without those specifics.
Support
KeyCDN offers ticket‑based support; Gcore support response times may vary on the free tier.
Lock‑in
Both provide standard CDN APIs and SSL options; no data on migration complexity.
Choose Gcore if…
Teams wanting a free test tier, extensive PoP network, and built‑in DDoS mitigation.
Choose KeyCDN if…
Developers needing simple setup, reliable API, and predictable pay‑as‑you‑go costs.
Common questions
Can I start using the service for free?
Gcore offers a free starter tier (10 GB bandwidth, 5 TB transfer); KeyCDN has no free tier.
Which service has a higher uptime guarantee?
Gcore guarantees 99.99% uptime; KeyCDN guarantees 99.9%.
Do both services support custom SSL certificates?
KeyCDN explicitly supports custom SSL and Let's Encrypt automation; Gcore’s SSL support is not specified.