Glance is a compact, highly customisable dashboard you can run on any server or in a tiny Docker container. It pulls together RSS feeds, subreddit posts, Hacker News, weather, YouTube uploads, Twitch streams, market prices, Docker status and server metrics into one configurable page. Deployable as a single binary under 20 MB or as a minimal Docker image, Glance supports multiple pages, layouts and themes via a simple configuration file, making it ideal for personal start pages and homelab monitoring.
nps is a powerful, lightweight, and high-performance intranet penetration proxy server. It supports various protocols such as TCP, UDP, SOCKS5, and HTTP, allowing for flexible and efficient traffic forwarding.
- Very small binary size and low resource usage
- Highly configurable with multiple pages and themes
- Wide range of built‑in widgets covering many common feeds
- Easy deployment via Docker or direct binary
- High-performance and lightweight solution
- Supports multiple protocols for flexible traffic forwarding
- Easy to configure and manage
- Free and open-source solution
- Limited to the widgets provided out‑of‑the‑box; custom widget development requires manual effort
- No built‑in authentication or user management, relying on external protection
- Lacks a graphical UI for configuration; edits are done in a text file
- Limited documentation and support resources
- May require technical expertise to set up and configure
- Limited scalability and performance in large-scale deployments
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Glance
View all →
Alternatives to NPS
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth NPS and Glance are free, open‑source Go tools, but NPS is a network proxy for intranet penetration while Glance is a personal dashboard; choose NPS for traffic routing needs, Glance for visual feed aggregation.
Key differences
- •Primary purpose: NPS forwards network traffic (TCP/UDP/SOCKS5/HTTP) vs. Glance displays feeds and widgets.
- •Target audience: NPS for developers/sysadmins managing internal services; Glance for self‑hosters wanting a start‑page dashboard.
- •Configuration: NPS uses a web management terminal; Glance relies on editing a text file.
- •Built‑in integrations: NPS focuses on protocols and HTTPS conversion; Glance offers RSS, weather, YouTube, Docker stats, etc.
- •Support channels: NPS only GitHub Issues; Glance provides email and documentation.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Glance deploys as a <20 MB binary and uses simple text config; NPS requires web UI setup and protocol knowledge.
Features & depth
NPS supports multiple network protocols, HTTPS conversion, and real‑time bandwidth monitoring, which is broader than Glance's widget set.
Integrations & ecosystem
Glance lists many ready‑made widget integrations (RSS, weather, YouTube, Docker, etc.); NPS lists only protocol support.
Scalability
NPS notes limited scalability but is designed for traffic forwarding; Glance is limited to personal dashboards and lacks scaling features.
Support
Glance offers email and documentation; NPS only provides GitHub Issues.
Security & privacy
NPS handles secure SSH, remote desktop, DNS, and HTTPS conversion; Glance has no built‑in authentication.
Choose Glance if…
Self‑hosters wanting a minimal, customizable personal dashboard with feed widgets.
Choose NPS if…
Developers or sysadmins needing a lightweight, self‑hosted proxy for internal service access.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both NPS and Glance are free and open‑source.
Which tool is easier to set up for a non‑technical user?
Glance deploys as a small binary or Docker container and uses a simple text file, making it easier for non‑technical users.
Can either product handle secure remote access to internal services?
NPS provides secure SSH, remote desktop, DNS resolution, and HTTPS conversion; Glance does not offer remote access capabilities.