FindAlternative
Back to GVA NDAチェック

GVA NDAチェック vs Jira

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Heads up: GVA NDAチェック and Jira are in different categories and aren't listed as alternatives — this comparison may not be meaningful.
Compare
GVA NDAチェック
GVA NDAチェックAI-powered NDA contract check service for free, supervised by lawyers
Jira
JiraThe #1 software development tool used by agile teams
Overview
Description

GVA NDAチェック is a free AI-powered contract review service supervised by lawyers, specifically designed for checking NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreements). It allows users to upload contracts, receive risk assessments (unfavorable, neutral, favorable) and clause-level modification suggestions. The service aims to help SMEs and freelancers without dedicated legal teams to review contracts efficiently. It has been adopted by over 400 companies and 1,000+ freelancers, and has received awards like the Nikkei Excellent Products and Services Award.

Jira is a proprietary issue tracking product developed by Atlassian that allows bug tracking and agile project management.

Pricing
Free

GVA NDAチェックは完全無料で利用できます。

Freemium

Free for up to 10 users; paid plans from about $7.75/user/month.

Category
Legal & Compliance
Project Management
Best for
SMEs, startups, freelancers, and legal professionals who need to review NDA contracts without a dedicated legal team.
Software and enterprise teams
Specifications
Awards
Nikkei Excellent Products and Services Award (2019), TechCrunch Tokyo Startup Battle Microsoft Award (2018), etc.
—
Language
Japanese
—
Free Tier
Yes, unlimited NDA checks with registration
—
User Target
SMEs, startups, freelancers, and legal professionals
—
Currently Supported Contract Types
NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) only
—
platforms
—
Web, iOS, Android
deployment
—
Cloud/SaaS
open source
—
No
api available
—
Yes
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Completely free for NDA checks (unlimited)
  • AI-powered review supervised by professional lawyers
  • Provides risk visualizations and clear recommendations
  • Easy three-step process: upload, check, modify
  • Powerful and configurable
  • Strong agile support
  • Scales to enterprise
  • Big ecosystem
Cons
  • Currently only supports NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) contract types, limiting its use for other contract forms.
  • The service is available only in Japanese, which restricts its accessibility to non-Japanese speakers.
  • While the NDA check is free, other contract checks (e.g., business consignment, system development) may require additional costs or separate services.
  • Can be complex/heavy
  • Configuration overhead
  • Overkill for tiny teams
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
6
User rating
Not enough data
4.5 (4)

What reviewers say

GVA NDAチェック Reviews

No reviews yet.

Jira Reviews

4.5 (4)
Verified User

Solid choice

Tried Jira recently. Big ecosystem. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Verified User

Recommend Jira

We rolled out Jira last quarter. Strong agile support. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Verified User

Decent with caveats

We rolled out Jira last quarter. Upside: scales to enterprise. Downside: configuration overhead.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to GVA NDAチェック

View all →
FoundersAgree
FoundersAgree

Instant AI-driven contract risk analysis for founders and freelancers—without the law-firm price tag.

Compare
Agreee.ai
Agreee.ai

Write Agreements with AI

Compare
LegalCheckPro
LegalCheckPro

Instant AI-powered legal document reviews that turn complicated contracts into clear, ranked risk reports — for just $6.99.

Compare
SpeedLegal
SpeedLegal

Review your contracts 3X faster with SpeedLegal - Understand Contract Risks in Minutes

Compare

Alternatives to Jira

View all →
Shortcut
Shortcut

Simple, structured project management for software teams

Compare
GitLab
GitLab

The most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform

Compare
OpenProject
OpenProject

Free and open source project management software

Compare
ClickUp
ClickUp

All-in-one work platform: tasks, docs, goals, and more.

Compare