King of the Monsters vs WWF Attitude
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Choose from six colossal creatures and smash your way through twelve destructive stages, each set in a different city. The final showdown pits you against a palette‑swapped version of your own monster, testing your mastery of the arena. Team up with a friend in split‑screen co‑op or go solo to pin opponents for a three‑count or survive the timer. Classic SN K arcade action meets monster‑mash sport in this retro fighting experience.
WWF Attitude brings the excitement of 1990s professional wrestling to your screen, featuring a roster of more than 40 iconic superstars like Stone Cold Steve Austin, The Rock, and The Undertaker. Customize move sets and costumes to craft a unique competitor and dominate the squared circle. The game supports both single‑player and split‑screen multiplayer, with two‑man commentary from Shane McMahon and Jerry "The King" Lawler adding authentic broadcast flavor. Perfect for fans of classic wrestling action and competitive couch co‑op.
- Exciting monster variety with distinct abilities
- Local co‑op split‑screen adds replay value
- Retro graphics and sound capture 1990s arcade feel
- Simple controls make it easy to pick up
- Large roster of iconic WWF stars
- Deep customization of wrestlers
- Two‑man commentary adds authenticity
- Split‑screen multiplayer for local competition
- Limited to local multiplayer, no online play
- Only six monsters (four in some ports) may feel repetitive
- Graphics are dated compared to modern titles
- Graphics are dated by modern standards
- Limited to split‑screen, no online play
- AI can be inconsistent in difficulty
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to King of the Monsters
View all →Alternatives to WWF Attitude
View all →
Step into the ring with iconic WWF superstars and unleash signature moves in fast‑paced action
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth are retro‑style fighting games with local split‑screen multiplayer, but King of the Monsters offers monster‑brawler action while WWF Attitude provides a larger roster and deep wrestler customization.
Key differences
- •King of the Monsters has only six playable monsters versus WWF Attitude’s 40+ licensed wrestlers
- •WWF Attitude includes a robust character‑creation system; King of the Monsters has none
- •King of the Monsters is rated ESRB E10+, WWF Attitude is ESRB T, affecting age suitability
- •WWF Attitude lists a price of $49.99; King of the Monsters pricing is not specified
- •WWF Attitude received a critic score (70/100); King of the Monsters has no score listed
Gameplay & fun factor
WWF Attitude offers many match types and deep wrestler customization, increasing variety over King of the Monsters’ six monsters.
Platform availability
King of the Monsters runs on Linux, Windows PC, and macOS; WWF Attitude platform info not provided.
Price & value
WWF Attitude’s MSRP is $49.99; King of the Monsters price is not specified, making value unclear.
Multiplayer / co‑op
Both support local split‑screen multiplayer only; neither offers online play.
Content & replayability
WWF Attitude’s 40+ characters and customization give more replay potential than King of the Monsters’ six monsters.
Difficulty & accessibility
King of the Monsters has simple controls and an E10+ rating, making it more accessible than WWF Attitude’s T rating.
Graphics & performance
Both are described as having dated graphics; no performance data to differentiate.
Choose King of the Monsters if…
Fans of classic arcade monster brawls who want simple controls and broader OS support.
Choose WWF Attitude if…
Players who want a large licensed roster, deep customization, and varied match types.
Common questions
Which game is cheaper?
King of the Monsters price is not specified; WWF Attitude costs $49.99.
Can I play online?
No; both titles only support local split‑screen multiplayer.
Is one game more family‑friendly?
King of the Monsters is ESRB E10+, while WWF Attitude is ESRB T, making the former more suitable for younger players.





