FindAlternative
Back to Loopcloud

Loopcloud vs Steinberg Cubase

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Loopcloud
LoopcloudCloud‑based sample library with AI‑driven search and DAW integration
Steinberg Cubase
Steinberg CubaseProfessional DAW for music production and scoring
Overview
Description

Loopcloud offers a massive royalty‑free sample library that lives in the cloud, letting producers browse, audition and download sounds directly from their DAW. Its AI‑powered tagging and smart filters make finding the perfect loop or one‑shot fast and intuitive. The service includes built‑in plugins for auditioning, key‑shifting, time‑stretching and layering, plus a desktop app that syncs your collection across devices. A tiered subscription gives access to millions of samples, while a free tier provides limited credits for testing the platform.

Cubase is a full-featured digital audio workstation used by composers, producers, and engineers for recording, editing, mixing, and mastering music. It offers a comprehensive set of tools for MIDI sequencing, audio editing, and virtual instrument integration. The software supports advanced features such as VST3 plug‑ins, score editing, and surround sound, making it suitable for both studio production and film scoring. Cubase runs on Windows and macOS, providing a stable platform for high‑end audio projects.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Music Production (DAW)
Music Production (DAW)
Best for
Music producers and beat makers
Music producers and composers
Specifications
open source
No
No
api available
No
No
support options
Email, Live Chat, Knowledge Base
Email, Phone, Online Knowledge Base
key integrations
Ableton Live, Logic Pro, FL Studio, Pro Tools
VST3, MIDI, Steinberg Cloud
deployment
—
Desktop App
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Huge, constantly growing sample catalog
  • AI‑powered search speeds workflow
  • Seamless DAW integration
  • Cross‑platform cloud sync
  • Extensive MIDI and audio editing tools
  • Robust VST3 and virtual instrument support
  • Professional score editor for notation
  • High‑quality built‑in effects and channel strips
Cons
  • Full library requires paid subscription
  • Desktop app can be resource‑heavy
  • Limited offline credits on free tier
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Only available on Windows and macOS
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Loopcloud

View all →
Splice Sounds
Splice Sounds

Instant access to royalty‑free samples, loops, and presets.

Compare
Sononym
Sononym

AI-powered sample browser that finds and organizes sounds by similarity

Compare

Alternatives to Steinberg Cubase

View all →
Reaper
Reaper

Complete digital audio workstation for professional production and recording.

Compare
FL Studio
FL Studio

The all-in-one digital audio workstation used by millions to produce, mix, and master music.

Compare
Ableton Live
Ableton Live

A powerful digital audio workstation designed for music creation and live performance.

Compare
Bitwig Studio
Bitwig Studio

Modular digital audio workstation for music production, sound design, and live performance.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Cubase is a complete, professional DAW with extensive editing, mixing, and scoring tools, while Loopcloud is a cloud‑based sample library that adds AI‑driven search and basic DAW integration.

Key differences

  • •Scope: Cubase is a full‑featured DAW; Loopcloud only provides samples and limited editing.
  • •Pricing model: Cubase is a one‑time purchase; Loopcloud requires an ongoing subscription for full access.
  • •Platform support: Cubase runs on Windows/macOS only; Loopcloud syncs across Windows, macOS, and Linux via its cloud app.
  • •Mixing & automation: Cubase includes a MixConsole, surround mixing, and advanced automation; Loopcloud lacks mixing infrastructure.
  • •Integration depth: Cubase natively supports VST3 plug‑ins and Steinberg Cloud; Loopcloud offers a VST/AU plug‑in mainly for sample auditioning.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Cubase is a one‑time paid license; Loopcloud needs a recurring subscription for full library access.

Steinberg Cubase

Ease of use / learning curve

Loopcloud’s interface focuses on sample browsing and is simpler; Cubase has a steep learning curve for beginners.

Loopcloud

Features & depth

Cubase offers unlimited tracks, MixConsole, surround mixing, score editor, and advanced automation; Loopcloud provides only sample management and basic time‑stretch/pitch tools.

Steinberg Cubase

Integrations & ecosystem

Loopcloud lists direct integration with Ableton Live, Logic Pro, FL Studio, Pro Tools; Cubase integrates mainly VST3 and Steinberg Cloud.

Loopcloud

Support

Cubase offers phone support in addition to email and knowledge base; Loopcloud provides email, live chat, and knowledge base only.

Steinberg Cubase

Choose Loopcloud if…

Beat‑makers or producers who primarily need a massive, searchable sample library with cloud sync.

Choose Steinberg Cubase if…

Professional producers/composers needing a full DAW, surround mixing, and notation capabilities.

Common questions

Is Cubase a better long‑term investment than Loopcloud?

Cubase is a one‑time purchase, so no recurring fees; Loopcloud requires an ongoing subscription for full library access.

Can I use Loopcloud as a standalone DAW?

No; Loopcloud is a sample library with a VST/AU plugin for auditioning, not a full DAW.

Which product supports surround (7.1) mixing?

Cubase supports surround mixing up to 7.1 channels; Loopcloud does not provide mixing capabilities.