FindAlternative
Back to NPS

NPS vs RunCloud

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
NPS
NPSLightweight Intranet Penetration Proxy Server
Visit
RunCloud
RunCloudWeb-based control panel for managing your own cloud servers without deep Linux skills
Visit
Overview
Description

nps is a powerful, lightweight, and high-performance intranet penetration proxy server. It supports various protocols such as TCP, UDP, SOCKS5, and HTTP, allowing for flexible and efficient traffic forwarding.

RunCloud is a server management control panel that lets developers and agencies deploy and manage websites on their own cloud servers from providers like DigitalOcean, AWS, Vultr, Linode, Hetzner, and Google Cloud. It provides a graphical interface over Linux server administration tasks, so teams can run their own infrastructure without deep command-line expertise.

Pricing
Free
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Server Management
Server Management
Best for
Developers and system administrators
Developers and agencies self-managing cloud web servers
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Cloud/SaaS
open source
Yes
No
github stars
34,138
—
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
GitHub Issues
Email, Live Chat
primary language
Go
—
key integrations
—
DigitalOcean, AWS, Vultr, Linode, Hetzner, Google Cloud
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High-performance and lightweight solution
  • Supports multiple protocols for flexible traffic forwarding
  • Easy to configure and manage
  • Free and open-source solution
  • Makes self-managed cloud server hosting accessible to teams without dedicated sysadmins
  • Works across multiple cloud providers instead of locking users into one host
  • Significantly cheaper than fully managed hosting since the underlying server cost stays at raw cloud provider rates
  • Free trial lets teams evaluate the panel before committing to a subscription
Cons
  • Limited documentation and support resources
  • May require technical expertise to set up and configure
  • Limited scalability and performance in large-scale deployments
  • Users are still responsible for the underlying server's uptime and provider billing separately
  • Detailed pricing tiers were not published on the public pricing page, making cost comparison harder upfront
  • Still requires baseline familiarity with server concepts even with a graphical interface
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to NPS

View all →
frp
frp

Fast, open-source reverse proxy for NAT traversal and firewall bypass

Compare
rathole
rathole

High-performance reverse proxy for NAT traversal

Compare
nginx
nginx

High-performance web server and reverse proxy

Compare
NATS Server
NATS Server

High-Performance server for NATS.io

Compare

Alternatives to RunCloud

View all →
1Panel
1Panel

Open-source Linux server management panel for Docker, websites, databases, and AI agent deployment.

Compare
cPanel
cPanel

The industry-standard Linux hosting control panel for managing servers, accounts, and websites.

Compare
Plesk
Plesk

Hosting and server management platform that works across Linux and Windows, on-prem or in the cloud.

Compare
ChemiCloud
ChemiCloud

Web hosting with 24/7 human support, free migrations and a 45-day money-back guarantee.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

NPS is a free, lightweight proxy for intranet penetration requiring technical setup, while RunCloud is a paid SaaS control panel that simplifies cloud server management for teams with some server knowledge.

Key differences

  • •Deployment model: NPS is self‑hosted open‑source; RunCloud is a cloud‑based SaaS service.
  • •Primary purpose: NPS focuses on protocol forwarding and intranet access; RunCloud manages full Linux cloud servers, web apps, SSL, firewalls.
  • •Cost: NPS is free; RunCloud requires a subscription with unspecified tier pricing.
  • •Support channels: NPS only via GitHub Issues; RunCloud offers email and live‑chat support.
  • •Target audience expertise: NPS expects developers/sysadmins comfortable with manual config; RunCloud targets developers/agencies needing a GUI.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

NPS is free and open‑source, whereas RunCloud requires a paid subscription.

NPS

Ease of use / learning curve

RunCloud provides a graphical control panel and web‑based UI; NPS relies on manual config and limited docs.

RunCloud

Features & depth

RunCloud covers server provisioning, SSL, firewalls, monitoring, and multi‑site hosting; NPS offers only proxy/tunnel functions.

RunCloud

Integrations & ecosystem

RunCloud integrates with major cloud providers (DigitalOcean, AWS, etc.); NPS lists only platform support, no external integrations.

RunCloud

Support

RunCloud offers email and live‑chat; NPS support is limited to GitHub Issues.

RunCloud

Scalability

RunCloud is designed for managing multiple servers and sites; NPS notes limited scalability for large deployments.

RunCloud

Security & privacy

NPS runs entirely on‑premises under user control; RunCloud involves SaaS handling of credentials and server access.

NPS

Choose NPS if…

Teams needing a free, on‑premise proxy for intranet access and comfortable with manual setup.

Choose RunCloud if…

Organizations that want a managed, GUI‑driven cloud server control panel and can budget for a subscription.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use NPS?

No, NPS is free and open‑source.

Can RunCloud manage servers on all major cloud providers?

Yes, it integrates with DigitalOcean, AWS, Vultr, Linode, Hetzner, and Google Cloud.

What support options are available for each product?

NPS support is via GitHub Issues only; RunCloud provides email and live‑chat support.