FindAlternative
Back to StackPath

StackPath vs Fly.io

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
ST
StackPathEdge computing and content delivery network platform designed for high-performance apps.
Visit
Fly.io
Fly.ioRun full-stack apps and databases globally
Visit
Overview
Description

StackPath was a prominent edge computing and cloud services provider that offered content delivery network (CDN), edge compute, and web application firewall solutions. Its platform enabled developers to run workloads closer to end users to reduce latency and improve application responsiveness. Although StackPath wound down its primary edge and CDN services, it remains recognized for its developer-centric approach to distributed infrastructure and serverless edge scripting. The service empowered businesses to manage security, routing, and computing from a centralized control plane across global points of presence.

Fly.io is a platform that lets developers run full-stack applications and databases on a worldwide network of edge locations. It abstracts infrastructure so you can focus on code while your services run close to users for faster response times.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Freemium
Category
Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Best for
Developers and enterprises needing edge infrastructure
Developers and startups needing global edge hosting
Specifications
free tier
No
Yes
uptime sla
99.9% availability
99.9% (Enterprise plan only)
datacenter regions
Global points of presence across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific
North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, South America
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Low latency edge computing architecture
  • Robust built-in security and WAF capabilities
  • Developer-friendly API control plane
  • Comprehensive real-time analytics
  • Generous free tier with simple CLI deployment
  • Automatic TLS and built-in scaling
  • Global deployment and edge locations for faster response times
  • Ideal for startups, hobby projects, and production workloads
Cons
  • Service availability and business pivots changed over time
  • Steeper learning curve for edge logic deployment
  • Pricing could be high for lower-traffic applications
  • Limited control over underlying infrastructure
  • May require additional setup for complex applications
  • Dependent on Fly.io's network and infrastructure
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to StackPath

View all →
Fly.io
Fly.io

Run full-stack apps and databases globally

Compare
Gcore
Gcore

Fast global CDN with low latency and high capacity

Compare
Akamai
Akamai

A global content delivery network and cloud computing platform for web security.

Compare
Bunny.net
Bunny.net

Fast and secure global CDN with edge storage and optimization

Compare

Alternatives to Fly.io

View all →
📦
StackPath

Edge computing and content delivery network platform designed for high-performance apps.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

StackPath offers enterprise‑grade edge security and analytics with a paid model, while Fly.io provides a generous free tier and simpler developer workflow.

Key differences

  • •Pricing model: StackPath is paid only; Fly.io includes a free tier.
  • •Security features: StackPath bundles an enterprise‑grade WAF; Fly.io relies on automatic TLS only.
  • •Developer control: StackPath offers API‑driven edge logic; Fly.io focuses on CLI‑first deployment with less infrastructure control.
  • •Service level guarantees: StackPath guarantees 99.9% SLA for all plans; Fly.io’s SLA applies only to its Enterprise tier.
  • •Global footprint: Both are global, but StackPath lists specific regions (NA, EU, APAC) whereas Fly.io lists broader continents including South America.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Fly.io offers a freemium tier, allowing zero‑cost entry; StackPath has no free tier and may be costly for low traffic.

Fly.io

Uptime & reliability

StackPath provides a 99.9% SLA for all customers; Fly.io’s 99.9% SLA is limited to Enterprise plans.

StackPath

Performance

StackPath emphasizes low‑latency edge computing architecture and real‑time telemetry; Fly.io offers global edge but less detailed performance claims.

StackPath

Developer experience

Fly.io’s simple CLI and automatic TLS make onboarding fast; StackPath requires API/infra‑as‑code integration, steeper learning curve.

Fly.io

Regions & compliance

Both provide global points of presence across North America, Europe, and Asia; Fly.io additionally lists South America and Australia.

Tie

Support

StackPath targets enterprises and includes built‑in security and analytics, implying higher‑level support; Fly.io’s free tier offers limited support.

StackPath

Lock‑in

Fly.io abstracts infrastructure, reducing vendor lock‑in; StackPath’s edge logic and APIs tie more closely to its platform.

Fly.io

Choose StackPath if…

Enterprises needing guaranteed SLA, advanced WAF, and detailed analytics, willing to pay.

Choose Fly.io if…

Startups or hobbyists wanting free hosting, quick CLI deployment, and automatic scaling.

Common questions

Can I start for free with either service?

Fly.io offers a free tier; StackPath has no free tier.

Do both providers guarantee 99.9% uptime?

StackPath guarantees 99.9% SLA for all plans; Fly.io’s 99.9% SLA applies only to its Enterprise plan.

Which platform includes built‑in web application firewall protection?

StackPath includes an enterprise‑grade WAF; Fly.io provides only automatic TLS encryption.