Tigris vs Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Tigris offers a globally distributed object storage service that is fully compatible with the S3 API, letting you use existing tools, SDKs, and workflows without code changes. Data is replicated across multiple regions to provide low-latency access for users worldwide. The platform scales automatically from gigabytes to petabytes, includes built-in encryption, fine-grained IAM controls, and lifecycle management features, making it ideal for a wide range of cloud-native applications.
Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is a cloud storage solution that provides S3-compatible object storage at a flat rate, with no egress or API request fees. This makes it an attractive option for businesses and organizations that need to store large amounts of data in the cloud without incurring additional costs.
- S3-compatible API eliminates migration effort.
- Global replication reduces latency for worldwide users.
- Automatic scaling handles unpredictable workloads.
- Free tier enables testing without upfront cost.
- Flat rate pricing with no additional fees
- High durability and availability
- S3-compatible APIs and tools
- Secure environment with encryption and access controls
- Pricing details beyond free tier are usage-based and may be complex.
- Limited to object storage; no built-in database services.
- Region selection is abstracted, reducing control over data residency.
- Limited scalability and performance
- No free tier or trial available
- Limited support for certain file types and formats
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Tigris
View all →
Alternatives to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataTigris offers a free tier and global automatic scaling for developers, while Wasabi provides a flat‑rate, enterprise‑grade storage with higher durability but no free tier.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: Tigris is freemium with usage‑based costs after the free tier; Wasabi is a flat per‑GB subscription with no free tier.
- •Global distribution: Tigris replicates data across multiple regions automatically; Wasabi limits locations to US, EU, APAC datacenters.
- •Uptime SLA: Wasabi guarantees 99.99% uptime; Tigris provides no explicit SLA in the facts.
- •Target audience: Tigris is aimed at developers building cloud‑native apps; Wasabi targets enterprises and large organizations.
- •Free tier availability: Tigris includes a free tier; Wasabi does not.
Pricing & value
Tigris offers a free tier for testing; Wasabi only has paid flat‑rate pricing.
Uptime & reliability
Wasabi specifies a 99.99% uptime SLA; Tigris provides no SLA detail.
Performance
Tigris claims low‑latency global replication; Wasabi notes limited scalability and performance.
Developer experience
Tigris emphasizes S3‑compatible API plus IAM integration and automatic tiering for developers.
Regions & compliance
Tigris replicates across multiple geographic regions (unspecified count); Wasabi lists only three regions.
Support
Neither product description provides support details to differentiate.
Lock‑in
Both use S3‑compatible APIs, making migration between them relatively straightforward.
Choose Tigris if…
Developers needing a free entry point, global low‑latency storage, and automatic scaling.
Choose Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage if…
Enterprises preferring predictable flat‑rate costs, high durability SLA, and defined datacenter regions.
Common questions
Is there any free tier to try the service?
Yes, Tigris offers a free tier; Wasabi does not provide a free tier or trial.
What uptime guarantee does each service provide?
Wasabi states a 99.99% uptime SLA; Tigris does not specify an uptime guarantee.
How are the storage costs calculated after the free tier?
Tigris uses usage‑based pricing beyond the free tier (details not provided); Wasabi charges a flat per‑GB rate with no egress or API fees.