FindAlternative
Back to TimeShift

TimeShift vs TimeSplitters: Future Perfect

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
TimeShift
TimeShiftMaster time to become the ultimate weapon against a dystopian alternate reality.
TimeSplitters: Future Perfect
TimeSplitters: Future PerfectStep into the boots of Sergeant Cortez in this time-bending sci-fi first-person shooter.
Overview
Description

Dr. Aiden Krone has made a reckless Time Jump across the space-time continuum, resulting in a disturbing alternate reality within the bleak and rain-soaked Alpha District. As Colonel Michael Swift, players must utilize a specialized Beta Suit to control time itself in order to survive intense combat encounters and solve environmental puzzles.

TimeSplitters: Future Perfect is an acclaimed first-person shooter developed by Free Radical Design and published by Electronic Arts. Players assume the role of Sergeant Cortez, a 25th-century space marine tasked with leaping across different eras of history to stop the malevolent TimeSplitters race from ever being created. The game delivers a rich blend of action, sci-fi exploration, and distinct comedy across a narrative single-player campaign and robust multiplayer modes. Traverse diverse time periods from the Victorian era to futuristic dystopias while utilizing a massive arsenal of weapons and navigating split-screen and co-operative gameplay experiences.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
First-Person Shooters
First-Person Shooters
Best for
Sci-fi fans and FPS gamers
Classic FPS fans and retro gamers
Specifications
General
msrp
$19.99−60%
$49.99
release date
2007-10-30
2005-03-21
Specifications
developer
Saber Interactive
Free Radical Design
publisher
Activision, Sierra Entertainment
Electronic Arts
age rating
PEGI 18, ESRB M
PEGI 18, ESRB M
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative, Split screen
critic score
75/100
80/100+7%
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Innovative time-manipulation mechanics that change combat strategy
  • Engaging sci-fi atmosphere and dystopian setting
  • Mix of intense shooting action and clever puzzles
  • Includes both single-player and multiplayer modes
  • Engaging time-travel storyline with great humor
  • Diverse weapon selection spanning multiple eras
  • Robust split-screen and co-op multiplayer options
  • Memorable level design and varied gameplay pacing
Cons
  • Can feel dated compared to modern first-person shooters
  • Pacing occasionally slows down during puzzle segments
  • Multiplayer community may be inactive
  • Graphics reflect its original 2005 release era
  • Lacks modern online matchmaking on original platforms
  • Single-player campaign can feel linear upon replay
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to TimeShift

View all →
Crysis 3
Crysis 3

Fight the future in a shattered city with nanosuit power and stealth tactics.

Compare
Crysis
Crysis

Experience unparalleled freedom and power in a futuristic battlefield.

Compare
Body Harvest
Body Harvest

Travel through time to stop alien harvests in this action‑driving shooter.

Compare
The Conduit
The Conduit

Fight alien conspiracies in Washington D.C. with bizarre weapons

Compare

Alternatives to TimeSplitters: Future Perfect

View all →
TimeSplitters 2
TimeSplitters 2

A thrilling first-person shooter spanning multiple eras to retrieve stolen Time Crystals.

Compare
Perfect Dark (Game Boy Color)
Perfect Dark (Game Boy Color)

Step into the shoes of agent Joanna Dark in this iconic sci-fi first-person shooter.

Compare
Body Harvest
Body Harvest

Travel through time to stop alien harvests in this action‑driving shooter.

Compare
Duke Nukel: Zero Hour
Duke Nukel: Zero Hour

Time‑bending action, guns blazing, Duke’s finest hour!

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

TimeSplitters: Future Perfect offers broader multiplayer modes and a larger weapon variety at a higher price, while TimeShift provides innovative time‑control gameplay at a lower cost.

Key differences

  • •Multiplayer scope: Future Perfect includes split‑screen and co‑op; TimeShift only basic multiplayer.
  • •Core mechanic: TimeShift centers on time‑manipulation puzzles; Future Perfect focuses on traditional FPS combat.
  • •Price: Future Perfect $49.99 vs TimeShift $19.99.
  • •Release era graphics: Future Perfect reflects 2005 visuals; TimeShift (2007) is similarly dated but slightly newer.
  • •Content volume: Future Perfect lists historical to futuristic weapons; TimeShift mentions a futuristic arsenal but fewer categories.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

TimeShift’s unique time‑control mechanics add strategic depth beyond standard shooting.

TimeShift

Platform availability

Both are PC/console releases from mid‑2000s; no platform data differentiates them.

Tie

Price & value

TimeShift costs $19.99 versus Future Perfect $49.99, offering lower entry cost.

TimeShift

Multiplayer / co‑op

Future Perfect supports split‑screen, co‑op and more multiplayer modes; TimeShift only single‑player and basic multiplayer.

TimeSplitters: Future Perfect

Content & replayability

Future Perfect provides a larger weapon range and varied level designs across eras.

TimeSplitters: Future Perfect

Difficulty & accessibility

Both have similar ESRB/M ratings and no specific accessibility info; difficulty appears comparable.

Tie

Graphics & performance

Both are dated 2005‑2007 titles; neither offers modern graphics.

Tie

Choose TimeShift if…

Players seeking innovative time‑control puzzles and lower price.

Choose TimeSplitters: Future Perfect if…

Fans who want extensive multiplayer, split‑screen co‑op, and a wide weapon arsenal.

Common questions

Which game is cheaper?

TimeShift costs $19.99; Future Perfect costs $49.99.

Which title has split‑screen or co‑op multiplayer?

Future Perfect includes split‑screen and co‑op; TimeShift does not.

Do both games offer time‑manipulation mechanics?

Only TimeShift features explicit slow‑down, stop, and reverse time mechanics; Future Perfect does not.