Agiloft Astra vs Juro
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Agiloft Astra is an AI-powered contract analysis platform that helps legal, procurement, finance, and sales teams review contracts, apply consistent standards, uncover risk, and turn contract data into business intelligence before and after signature.
Juro is a contract automation platform that manages the full contract lifecycle inside a browser-native editor rather than exchanging Word documents. Self-serve templates let non-legal teams generate approved contracts instantly, while AI-powered intake and review flags risky clauses and suggests redlines before a contract goes out. An intelligent repository lets teams query signed contracts using natural language to find obligations, renewal dates, or clauses across thousands of agreements. Juro integrates with CRMs and other business tools such as Salesforce, HubSpot, and Slack, and reports processing around 3 million contracts for customers across more than 85 countries.
No pricing information was found in the provided content for Agiloft Astra. The page content consists primarily of navigation menus, product descriptions, and solution overviews, but contains no explicit prices, plan names, or pricing tiers.
- Free tier available with no time limit and no data training compromise
- Reduces contract review time and improves consistency
- Works directly in Microsoft Word for review and redlining
- Scales from free to enterprise with SSO and dedicated support
- Combines drafting, negotiation, repository, and e-signature in one platform
- AI review helps flag risky clauses before contracts are sent
- Strong CRM integrations tie contracts to sales workflows
- Natural-language search makes finding contract terms faster
- Credits system may require monitoring for heavy analysis workloads
- Advanced enterprise features only available on custom-priced plan
- Some capabilities (CLM workflows, ConvoAI, Integration Hub) are part of Agiloft CLM rather than Astra standalone
- AI is positioned as an assistive layer; human final review is still expected
- No public pricing, requires a sales demo to get a quote
- Deeper integrations like Salesforce or Workday cost extra
- Primarily aimed at mid-market and enterprise teams rather than solo users
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Agiloft Astra
View all →
Alternatives to Juro
View all →
-1.png)
AI-powered contract creation, review, and management for MSPs and technology businesses.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataJuro offers an all‑in‑one AI‑driven contract creation, negotiation and e‑signature platform aimed at mid‑market/enterprise teams, while Agiloft Astra provides AI‑assisted review and post‑signature intelligence with a free tier and strong Word integration, targeting organizations that need flexible CLM and can tolerate a credit‑based usage model.
Key differences
- •Juro bundles drafting, negotiation, repository and e‑signature in one browser editor; Astra focuses on AI review within Microsoft Word and post‑signature analytics.
- •Juro’s pricing is quote‑based and requires a sales demo; Astra offers a free tier with 1,000 credits and a disclosed $120/month Pro plan.
- •Juro’s AI flags risky clauses automatically; Astra’s AI operates via a credit system and is positioned as an assistive layer requiring human final review.
- •Juro provides native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack and DocuSign; Astra’s integrations are limited to Microsoft Word, Agiloft CLM and an Integration Hub.
- •Juro has SOC 2 Type 2 certification and 99.9% uptime; Astra emphasizes “contracts not used to train AI” but no specific security certifications listed.
Pricing & value
Astra offers a free tier and a clear $120/mo Pro plan; Juro requires a custom quote, no public pricing.
Ease of use / learning curve
Astra works directly in Microsoft Word, familiar to many users; Juro uses a browser‑native editor requiring new UI learning.
Features & depth
Juro combines drafting, negotiation, repository, e‑signature, and AI review in one platform; Astra’s AI is limited to review and post‑signature insights.
Integrations & ecosystem
Juro lists multiple native integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, DocuSign, Google Drive); Astra’s integrations are mainly Word and its own CLM hub.
Collaboration
Juro supports real‑time negotiation and shared editing in the browser; Astra relies on Word documents and separate CLM workflows.
Scalability
Juro targets mid‑market and enterprise teams with dedicated account support; Astra scales from free tier to enterprise but advanced features need custom pricing.
Support & security
Juro has SOC 2 Type 2 certification and 99.9% uptime; Astra mentions enterprise‑grade security but no specific certifications.
Choose Agiloft Astra if…
Organizations that prefer AI‑assisted review inside Word, want a free tier, and can manage credit‑based usage.
Choose Juro if…
Enterprises needing end‑to‑end contract creation, negotiation, repository and e‑signature with strong CRM integrations.
Common questions
What are the pricing options?
Juro requires a custom quote (no public pricing). Astra offers a free tier (1,000 credits/month) and a $120/mo Pro plan; advanced plans are custom priced.
Can I use the platform without a developer for integrations?
Juro provides native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, DocuSign, Google Drive, and a REST API. Astra’s integrations are limited to Microsoft Word, Agiloft CLM, and its Integration Hub.
Is my data used to train the AI models?
Astra explicitly states contracts are not used to train AI models. Juro does not specify any data‑training policy.