FindAlternative
Back to Arc

Arc vs Sleipnir

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Arc
ArcA browser that organizes tabs into Spaces and adapts to how you browse.
Sleipnir
SleipnirA fast, customizable tab browser with powerful gestures
Overview
Description

Arc is a web browser from The Browser Company that rethinks the traditional tab bar. Instead of one long row of tabs, Arc organizes browsing into Spaces (separate profiles for work, personal life, or side projects) and a vertical sidebar, with Split View for viewing two pages side by side and built-in tools like an ad blocker and screenshot tool. Arc is built on Chromium, so it supports the same extensions and sites as Chrome, while adding features like Boosts (custom CSS/JS tweaks per site) and Easels for quick notes and moodboards. As of its current site messaging, active feature development has shifted to Dia, the company's newer AI-first browser, while Arc itself continues to receive Chromium security updates.

Sleipnir is a lightweight web browser for Windows and macOS that emphasizes speed, flexibility, and a highly customizable interface. It offers gesture controls, tab grouping, and a sleek rendering engine that balances performance with low resource usage. The browser includes built-in privacy features, a built-in ad blocker, and support for extensions, making it suitable for both casual browsing and power users who need advanced navigation shortcuts.

Pricing
Free
Freemium
Category
Desktop Browsers
Desktop Browsers
Best for
Power users and professionals who manage many tabs and projects at once
Power users and privacy‑focused desktop browsers
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
No
No
api available
No
No
support options
Help Center, Community
Email, Forum
key integrations
Chrome Web Store extensions
Chrome Web Store
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Tab and Space organization meaningfully reduces browser clutter for heavy multi-tasking users
  • Split View and Easels add real productivity tools most browsers lack natively
  • Free to use with no account required for core features
  • Full Chromium compatibility means existing Chrome extensions still work
  • Highly customizable interface
  • Robust gesture support
  • Built‑in ad blocker
  • Low memory footprint
Cons
  • Active feature development has shifted to the company's newer browser, Dia, with Arc now getting mostly maintenance updates
  • No Linux version
  • The unconventional layout has a learning curve for users coming from traditional tab bars
  • Limited extension ecosystem compared to Chrome/Firefox
  • Mac version lags behind Windows in feature updates
  • No native Linux support
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Arc

View all →
Zen Browser
Zen Browser

Firefox-based browser for organized workspaces

Compare
Vivaldi
Vivaldi

A highly customizable and feature-rich web browser built for power users.

Compare
Cent Browser
Cent Browser

A Chromium‑based browser packed with productivity‑boosting features

Compare
Sleipnir
Sleipnir

A fast, customizable tab browser with powerful gestures

Compare

Alternatives to Sleipnir

View all →
Vivaldi
Vivaldi

A highly customizable and feature-rich web browser built for power users.

Compare
Arc
Arc

A browser that organizes tabs into Spaces and adapts to how you browse.

Compare
Falkon
Falkon

A lightweight KDE web browser built for privacy, security and deep customization

Compare
Qutebrowser
Qutebrowser

Keyboard‑focused, minimal web browser for power users

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both are free‑to‑use browsers for power users, but Sleipnir (A) emphasizes low memory use and gesture control, while Arc (B) focuses on tab organization and built‑in productivity tools.

Key differences

  • •Gesture support: Sleipnir offers mouse/touchpad gestures; Arc does not.
  • •Tab organization: Arc provides Spaces, vertical sidebar, and auto‑archiving; Sleipnir only has basic tab grouping.
  • •Productivity add‑ons: Arc includes Split View, Easels, and custom CSS/JS boosts; Sleipnir offers reading mode and ad blocker only.
  • •Platform coverage: Neither offers Linux; Sleipnir has Windows and macOS, Arc only Windows and macOS as well.
  • •Pricing model: Sleipnir is freemium (potential paid features); Arc is completely free.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Arc is fully free; Sleipnir uses a freemium model that may require payment for advanced features.

Arc

Ease of use / learning curve

Sleipnir uses a conventional tab bar; Arc’s vertical sidebar and Spaces require adjustment for traditional users.

Sleipnir

Features & depth

Arc adds Spaces, Split View, Easels, and custom site boosts, offering broader productivity tooling than Sleipnir.

Arc

Integrations & ecosystem

Both integrate with Chrome Web Store extensions and have no native API support.

Tie

Support

Sleipnir offers email and forum; Arc provides a Help Center and community—comparable support channels.

Tie

Choose Arc if…

Professionals juggling many projects who want built‑in tab organization and productivity panes.

Choose Sleipnir if…

Power users who need low RAM usage and gesture‑based navigation on Windows/macOS.

Common questions

Is there any cost to use either browser?

Arc is completely free; Sleipnir is freemium, meaning core features are free but some advanced options may require payment.

Can I use my existing Chrome extensions with these browsers?

Yes, both browsers support Chrome Web Store extensions.

Do either of the browsers run on Linux?

No, neither Sleipnir nor Arc provides a native Linux version.