ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3 vs QNAP TS-464
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The Lockerstor 6 Gen3 is a six‑bay network‑attached storage solution powered by a quad‑core AMD Ryzen processor, delivering desktop‑class performance for demanding multi‑user environments. Equipped with dual 10 GbE ports and optional M.2 NVMe caching, it offers high‑speed data access, scalable capacity up to 96 TB, and a rich app ecosystem for backup, virtualization, and media streaming.
The QNAP TS-464 is a four-bay desktop NAS designed for home and small business users. It features dual 2.5GbE ports for high-speed networking, a PCIe expansion slot for adding additional functionality, and hardware transcoding for efficient video processing. With its compact design and quiet operation, the TS-464 is an ideal solution for those looking for a reliable and feature-rich NAS.
- Desktop‑class AMD Ryzen CPU for high multitasking performance.
- Dual 10 GbE ports deliver ultra‑fast network speeds.
- M.2 NVMe slots enable caching for accelerated I/O.
- Six hot‑swap bays allow massive, scalable storage.
- High-speed networking with dual 2.5GbE ports
- Flexible storage options with 4-bay design
- Efficient video processing with hardware transcoding
- Compact and quiet design suitable for home or small office use
- Higher price point compared to basic NAS models.
- Limited to 2 M.2 slots for SSD caching.
- No built‑in Wi‑Fi; relies on wired networking.
- Limited scalability with only 4 bays
- No built-in Wi-Fi or 10GbE support
- Requires technical expertise for setup and configuration
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3
View all →
Powerful 4‑bay NAS with Ryzen performance and 10 GbE upgrade path.
Alternatives to QNAP TS-464
View all →Powerful 4‑bay NAS with Ryzen performance and 10 GbE upgrade path.
High‑performance 6‑bay NAS with AMD Ryzen CPU, 10 GbE and NVMe cache
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataThe ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3 offers higher performance, more bays, and 10 GbE networking at a premium price, while the QNAP TS-464 provides a lower‑cost, quieter 4‑bay solution with 2.5 GbE.
Key differences
- •CPU: Lockerstor uses a quad‑core AMD Ryzen R1505G; TS‑464’s CPU not specified (likely lower‑end).
- •Drive capacity: Lockerstor has six hot‑swap bays (up to 96 TB); TS‑464 has four bays.
- •Network: Lockerstor includes dual 10 GbE and 2.5 GbE ports; TS‑464 only dual 2.5 GbE.
- •NVMe caching: Lockerstor provides two M.2 NVMe slots; TS‑464 has no NVMe slots.
- •Price: Lockerstor MSRP $1,299 vs. TS‑464 $599.
Performance
Lockerstor’s AMD Ryzen quad‑core CPU and NVMe cache give higher multitasking and I/O speed than TS‑464’s unspecified CPU.
Build quality
Lockerstor offers optional redundant power supplies and ECC‑enabled memory, indicating enterprise‑grade robustness.
Connectivity
Lockerstor provides dual 10 GbE + dual 2.5 GbE ports; TS‑464 only dual 2.5 GbE.
Power & efficiency
TS‑464 weighs 3.5 kg vs. Lockerstor 7.5 kg, implying lower power draw and easier placement.
Compatibility
Both run proprietary OS (ADM vs. QTS) and are not open source; no clear advantage.
Price & value
TS‑464 costs $599, less than half of Lockerstor’s $1,299 price.
Warranty & support
Both offer a 2‑year warranty.
Choose ASUSTOR Lockerstor 6 Gen3 if…
SMBs or creative teams needing high throughput, 6‑bay capacity, and NVMe acceleration.
Choose QNAP TS-464 if…
Home users or small offices prioritizing cost, quiet operation, and modest storage needs.
Common questions
Is the higher price of the Lockerstor justified?
Yes if you need six bays, AMD Ryzen performance, dual 10 GbE, and NVMe caching; otherwise TS‑464 is cheaper.
Can either unit be expanded for 10 GbE networking?
Lockerstor includes native 10 GbE; TS‑464 would need a PCIe add‑on, which is not detailed in the specs.
Which model supports faster data transfer for large media files?
Lockerstor, thanks to its Ryzen CPU, dual 10 GbE ports, and optional NVMe cache, offers higher throughput.