Battlefield 3 vs Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Battlefield 3 delivers a cinematic, large‑scale combat experience set across iconic locations from Tehran to New York. The game blends infantry tactics with vehicle warfare, offering both a gripping single‑player campaign and a robust multiplayer suite. Its advanced Frostbite engine brings realistic destruction, dynamic weather, and seamless transitions between on‑foot and vehicular combat, immersing players in a modern battlefield like never before.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 delivers a cinematic single‑player campaign that spans continents, featuring high‑octane missions and a gripping storyline. The game also offers robust multiplayer modes, co‑operative missions, and split‑screen play for up to four players on the same console.
- Stunning graphics and realistic destruction
- Extensive variety of vehicles
- Deep class and loadout system
- Large, diverse maps
- High‑quality graphics and sound design.
- Extensive multiplayer content with many maps.
- Robust weapon and perk customization.
- Engaging single‑player storyline.
- Limited cross‑platform play
- Occasional matchmaking latency
- Single‑player campaign length is shorter than some rivals
- Limited post‑launch content updates.
- Matchmaking can be inconsistent on older consoles.
- No native support for newer hardware.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Battlefield 3
View all →
Intense modern warfare on consoles with massive multiplayer battles.
Alternatives to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
View all →
Intense, cinematic warfare that redefines the first‑person shooter experience
A groundbreaking first‑person shooter that redefined modern combat gaming
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBattlefield 3 is the safer default for higher critical acclaim and large-scale vehicular combat, while Modern Warfare 3 suits those wanting local split-screen and tight infantry action. The main trade-off is massive 64-player warfare with environmental destruction versus fast-paced tactical shooter action with local 4-player support.
Key differences
- •Player scale and environment: Battlefield 3 supports 64-player combined arms with Frostbite 2 environmental destruction, whereas Modern Warfare 3 focuses on fast-paced shooter action with a 12-mission campaign.
Gameplay & fun factor
Battlefield 3 scores 85/100 and features real-time environmental destruction and vehicle piloting, beating Modern Warfare 3's 81/100 score.
Platform availability
Modern Warfare 3 offers cross-platform compatibility across PS3, Xbox 360, PC, and Mac, while Battlefield 3 has limited cross-platform play.
Price & value
Both games share an identical one-time paid pricing model with an MSRP of $59.99.
Multiplayer / co-op
Modern Warfare 3 includes split-screen support for up to four players on the same console, which Battlefield 3 lacks.
Content & replayability
Battlefield 3 offers large, diverse maps supporting massive 64-player combined arms battles with vehicles like jets and tanks.
Difficulty & accessibility
Modern Warfare 3 includes Spec Ops missions and matchmaking, but lacks native support for newer hardware and can have inconsistent matchmaking.
Graphics & performance
Battlefield 3 features the Frostbite 2 engine with stunning graphics, realistic destruction, and dynamic weather effects.
Choose Battlefield 3 if…
Military shooter fans who want massive 64-player battles, vehicle warfare, and environmental destruction.
Choose Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 if…
Core FPS fans wanting local 4-player split-screen and extensive weapon customization.
Common questions
What is the price of each game?
Both games have a one-time paid MSRP of $59.99.
Do both games support local split-screen multiplayer?
Modern Warfare 3 supports split-screen for up to four players on the same console; split-screen is not specified for Battlefield 3.
Which game has a higher critic score?
Battlefield 3 has a critic score of 85/100, while Modern Warfare 3 has an 81/100 critic score.