FindAlternative
Back to Beszel

Beszel vs Glances

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Beszel
BeszelUltra-lightweight, self-hosted server and Docker/Podman monitoring hub
Glances
GlancesCross‑platform real‑time system monitoring for admins and DevOps
Overview
Description

Beszel is a free, open-source server monitoring hub built in Go for a tiny resource footprint, with an agent that uses only about 10-15MB of RAM per monitored system. The hub, built on PocketBase, gives a central dashboard for viewing CPU, memory, disk, network, and temperature history, while agents communicate over a minimal SSH connection with no need to expose systems publicly. It tracks Docker and Podman container resource usage individually, sends configurable alerts for CPU, memory, disk, bandwidth, temperature, and status changes, supports multi-user access with OAuth/OIDC login, and includes automatic backups plus a REST API out of the box.

Glances is an open‑source, cross‑platform monitoring tool that provides a concise, real‑time view of system resources such as CPU, memory, disk I/O, network, and processes. It runs on Linux, Windows, macOS and can be accessed via a web interface, making it ideal for both local and remote monitoring. Designed for system administrators and DevOps teams, Glances aggregates metrics into a single dashboard, supports customizable alerts, and integrates with scripts or APIs for automated workflows. Its lightweight design ensures minimal overhead while delivering comprehensive performance insights.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Network Monitoring
Monitoring & Logging
Best for
Homelab operators and small teams who want a lightweight, self-hosted alternative to heavier monitor
System Administrators and DevOps teams
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
No
support options
GitHub issues, community docs
Email, GitHub Issues
key integrations
Docker, Podman, S3-compatible storage, OAuth/OIDC
InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Cassandra, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Docker
github stars
33,155
primary language
Python
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Extremely low resource footprint, runs comfortably on a Raspberry Pi
  • Free and open source under the MIT license
  • Combines host and per-container Docker/Podman metrics in one dashboard
  • Built-in REST API and automatic backups included by default
  • Fully open‑source and free
  • Runs on all major operating systems
  • Lightweight with low resource overhead
  • Extensible via plugins and API
Cons
  • Primarily designed for Linux hosts; Windows support relies on community forks
  • Smaller ecosystem and plugin library than established tools like Zabbix or Netdata
  • Alerting is simpler and less feature-rich than dedicated enterprise monitoring platforms
  • No native mobile app
  • Limited built‑in visualization compared to commercial tools
  • Alerting requires manual configuration or external scripts
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Beszel

View all →
Glances
Glances

Cross‑platform real‑time system monitoring for admins and DevOps

Compare
Zabbix
Zabbix

Enterprise‑grade open‑source monitoring for networks, servers and applications

Compare
Gatus
Gatus

Self-hosted open-source monitoring and alerting for DevOps teams

Compare
Checkmate
Checkmate

Real-time server monitoring and incident tracking

Compare

Alternatives to Glances

View all →
Grafana
Grafana

Composable observability platform

Compare
netdata
netdata

Real-time system monitoring and performance troubleshooting

Compare
Gatus
Gatus

Self-hosted open-source monitoring and alerting for DevOps teams

Compare
mectrics
mectrics

A free, open-source menu bar app that shows your Mac's CPU, memory, battery, and more.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Glances offers broader OS support and richer plugin ecosystem at minimal cost, while Beszel provides a slimmer, self‑hosted footprint ideal for Linux‑only homelab setups.

Key differences

  • OS coverage: Glances runs on Windows, macOS, Linux; Beszel is primarily Linux‑only.
  • Resource usage: Beszel uses 10‑15 MB RAM per agent; Glances is lightweight but no exact RAM figure given.
  • Extensibility: Glances supports many plugins (Docker, MySQL, InfluxDB, etc.); Beszel has a smaller plugin library.
  • Alerting: Glances requires manual config or external scripts; Beszel includes built‑in configurable alerts.
  • Deployment model: Glances is a single tool with optional web UI; Beszel is a self‑hosted hub with multi‑user support.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open source, offering comparable cost‑free value.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Beszel provides a built‑in dashboard and multi‑user UI, whereas Glances relies on command‑line and manual alert setup.

Beszel

Features & depth

Glances includes extensive metrics, plugin support, and export options (JSON, CSV, InfluxDB) not listed for Beszel.

Glances

Integrations & ecosystem

Glances lists integrations with InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Kafka, Docker, etc.; Beszel mentions only Docker/Podman, S3, OAuth/OIDC.

Glances

Collaboration

Beszel supports multi‑user access with role‑based admin; Glances has no native multi‑user features.

Beszel

Scalability

Glances can run on Windows, macOS, Linux and export to time‑series stores, enabling large‑scale monitoring; Beszel is limited to Linux hosts.

Glances

Support

Glances offers email and GitHub Issues; Beszel only lists GitHub issues and community docs, no direct email support.

Glances

Choose Beszel if…

Small homelab operators or Linux‑only teams prioritizing minimal resource consumption.

Choose Glances if…

Enterprises or teams needing cross‑platform monitoring and extensive plugin support.

Common questions

Can I monitor Windows servers with Beszel?

Not specified; Beszel is primarily designed for Linux hosts, with Windows support only via community forks.

Which tool provides more built‑in alerting capabilities?

Beszel includes configurable alerts out of the box; Glances requires manual configuration or external scripts.

Do both tools support exporting metrics to external systems?

Glances can export to JSON, CSV, or InfluxDB; Beszel’s export capabilities are not specified.