FindAlternative
Back to Box

Box vs Double Commander

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Heads up: Box and Double Commander are in different categories and aren't listed as alternatives — this comparison may not be meaningful.
Compare
Box
BoxCloud content management for the enterprise.
Double Commander
Double CommanderFree, open-source dual-pane file manager inspired by Total Commander
Overview
Description

Box is a cloud content-management platform focused on enterprise security, compliance, and workflow, rather than just consumer file sync. It emphasizes governance, permissions, and integrations for business.

Double Commander is a free, open-source file manager with a classic dual-panel layout that lets you view and operate on two directories side by side. It includes a built-in text editor with syntax highlighting, a file viewer that handles hex, binary, and text formats, and native support for archive formats including ZIP, 7Z, RAR, TAR, and DEB. The app supports Total Commander-style plugins (WCX, WDX, WFX, WLX), FTP/SFTP/SSH connections, a multi-rename tool, and full Unicode and tabbed-interface support. It is cross-platform and actively maintained on GitHub, with both stable releases and snapshot builds available for users who want the latest features.

Pricing
Freemium

Free personal tier; business plans from about $15/user/month.

Free
Category
Cloud Storage
File Management
Best for
Enterprises and regulated industries
Power users and IT professionals who prefer dual-panel file management
Specifications
platforms
Web, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android
—
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Desktop App
open source
No
Yes
api available
Yes
—
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Strong enterprise security
  • Good governance and compliance
  • Wide integrations
  • Workflow automation
  • Completely free and open source with no ads or upsells
  • Deep plugin compatibility with the long-established Total Commander ecosystem
  • Cross-platform availability keeps a consistent workflow across operating systems
  • Handles a very wide range of archive formats natively
Cons
  • Overkill for individuals
  • Pricier than consumer options
  • Interface less consumer-polished
  • Interface looks dated compared to modern single-pane file explorers
  • Steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with dual-panel managers
  • Community-driven support means slower turnaround on niche bugs
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
8
0
User rating
4.0 (3)
Not enough data

What reviewers say

Box Reviews

4.0 (3)
Verified User

Decent with caveats

Tried Box recently. Upside: workflow automation. Downside: overkill for individuals.

Verified User

Great cloud-storage

We rolled out Box last quarter. Strong enterprise security. Minor gripe: overkill for individuals. Would recommend.

Verified User

Great cloud-storage

Tried Box recently. Workflow automation. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Read all reviews →

Double Commander Reviews

No reviews yet.

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Box

View all →
Dropbox
Dropbox

Cloud storage and file sync for individuals and teams.

Compare
eFileCabinet
eFileCabinet

Document management and workflow automation platform for regulated industries

Compare
Egnyte
Egnyte

Secure content cloud for enterprise file sharing and governance

Compare
Google Drive
Google Drive

Cloud storage integrated with Google Workspace.

Compare

Alternatives to Double Commander

View all →
Multi Commander
Multi Commander

Powerful dual-pane file manager for Windows power users

Compare
Total Commander
Total Commander

A powerful and feature-rich file manager replacement for Windows.

Compare
muCommander
muCommander

Free, cross‑platform dual‑pane file manager for power users

Compare
FileVoyager
FileVoyager

A powerful, free dual‑pane file manager for Windows

Compare