FindAlternative
Back to Box

Box vs Keka

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Heads up: Box and Keka are in different categories and aren't listed as alternatives — this comparison may not be meaningful.
Compare
Box
BoxCloud content management for the enterprise.
Keka
KekaA simple, strong macOS file archiver for compressing, encrypting, and extracting archives.
Overview
Description

Box is a cloud content-management platform focused on enterprise security, compliance, and workflow, rather than just consumer file sync. It emphasizes governance, permissions, and integrations for business.

Keka is a native macOS file archiving utility built around drag-and-drop simplicity. Users drop files or folders onto the Keka window or dock icon to compress them into 7z, ZIP, TAR, DMG, ISO, and other formats, with optional AES-256 password encryption for sensitive data. It can also split large archives into smaller chunks for easier transfer or storage on removable media. On the extraction side, Keka handles more than 30 archive formats including RAR, WIM, and APK, so Mac users are not limited to whatever format a file happened to arrive in. The app is distributed free directly from the developer's website, with an optional paid copy available on the Mac App Store as a way to support development, and its core engine is open source on GitHub.

Pricing
Freemium

Free personal tier; business plans from about $15/user/month.

Freemium
Category
Cloud Storage
Archivers & Compression
Best for
Enterprises and regulated industries
Mac users who need a fast, native alternative to built-in or paid archiving tools
Specifications
platforms
Web, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
Desktop App
open source
No
Yes
api available
Yes
No
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Strong enterprise security
  • Good governance and compliance
  • Wide integrations
  • Workflow automation
  • Genuinely native and lightweight compared to bundled Finder compression
  • Free to use in full from the developer's own site
  • Broad format support for both compressing and extracting
  • Simple enough for non-technical users while still offering encryption options
Cons
  • Overkill for individuals
  • Pricier than consumer options
  • Interface less consumer-polished
  • macOS only, so it is not an option for Windows or Linux users
  • No cloud sync or team-sharing features built in
  • Advanced automation (scripting, CLI batch jobs) is limited compared to command-line tools
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
8
0
User rating
4.0 (3)
Not enough data

What reviewers say

Box Reviews

4.0 (3)
Verified User

Decent with caveats

Tried Box recently. Upside: workflow automation. Downside: overkill for individuals.

Verified User

Great cloud-storage

We rolled out Box last quarter. Strong enterprise security. Minor gripe: overkill for individuals. Would recommend.

Verified User

Great cloud-storage

Tried Box recently. Workflow automation. No real complaints. Would recommend.

Read all reviews →

Keka Reviews

No reviews yet.

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Box

View all →
Google Drive
Google Drive

Cloud storage integrated with Google Workspace.

Compare
Microsoft OneDrive
Microsoft OneDrive

Cloud storage built into Windows and Microsoft 365.

Compare
Dropbox
Dropbox

Cloud storage and file sync for individuals and teams.

Compare
ShareFile
ShareFile

Secure file sharing and document collaboration platform for business.

Compare

Alternatives to Keka

View all →
PeaZip
PeaZip

Free, open-source file archiver supporting 200+ formats with strong encryption on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Compare
Bandizip
Bandizip

Fast, cross-platform archiver supporting 10+ compression formats and 40+ decompression formats.

Compare
7‑Zip
7‑Zip

High‑performance file archiver with strong compression

Compare
The Unarchiver
The Unarchiver

Free Mac app that opens RAR, 7z, and dozens of other archive formats the built-in tool cannot.

Compare