FindAlternative
Back to Cachefly

Cachefly vs StackPath

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Cachefly
CacheflyPremium private CDN for low-latency video and gaming delivery
Visit
ST
StackPathEdge computing and content delivery network platform designed for high-performance apps.
Visit
Overview
Description

Cachefly is a premium private Content Delivery Network (CDN) designed for low-latency video and gaming delivery. It provides fast and secure content delivery to users worldwide, with a focus on reducing latency and improving overall user experience.

StackPath was a prominent edge computing and cloud services provider that offered content delivery network (CDN), edge compute, and web application firewall solutions. Its platform enabled developers to run workloads closer to end users to reduce latency and improve application responsiveness. Although StackPath wound down its primary edge and CDN services, it remains recognized for its developer-centric approach to distributed infrastructure and serverless edge scripting. The service empowered businesses to manage security, routing, and computing from a centralized control plane across global points of presence.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Best for
Gaming and video streaming services
Developers and enterprises needing edge infrastructure
Specifications
free tier
No
No
uptime sla
99.99%
99.9% availability
datacenter regions
US, EU, APAC
Global points of presence across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fast and secure content delivery
  • Low-latency ideal for real-time applications
  • Private CDN solution for secure content delivery
  • Customizable security features
  • Low latency edge computing architecture
  • Robust built-in security and WAF capabilities
  • Developer-friendly API control plane
  • Comprehensive real-time analytics
Cons
  • Paid subscription model may not be suitable for small businesses or individuals
  • Limited free tier options
  • May require technical expertise for setup and configuration
  • Service availability and business pivots changed over time
  • Steeper learning curve for edge logic deployment
  • Pricing could be high for lower-traffic applications
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Cachefly

View all →
Gcore
Gcore

Fast global CDN with low latency and high capacity

Compare
CDNetworks
CDNetworks

Global content delivery network with acceleration and edge security services

Compare
Bunny.net
Bunny.net

Fast and secure global CDN with edge storage and optimization

Compare
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

High-performance content delivery network for fast web asset distribution.

Compare

Alternatives to StackPath

View all →
Fly.io
Fly.io

Run full-stack apps and databases globally

Compare
Akamai
Akamai

A global content delivery network and cloud computing platform for web security.

Compare
Fastly
Fastly

An edge cloud platform delivering faster, safer, and more scalable sites and apps.

Compare
Gcore
Gcore

Fast global CDN with low latency and high capacity

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

StackPath provides a broader edge‑computing platform with built‑in WAF and developer APIs, while Cachefly focuses on ultra‑low‑latency CDN for video/gaming with a slightly higher SLA; choose based on whether you need edge compute and security (StackPath) or pure low‑latency media delivery (Cachefly).

Key differences

  • •StackPath includes serverless edge execution and integrated WAF; Cachefly does not mention compute or WAF.
  • •Cachefly advertises a 99.99% uptime SLA versus StackPath's 99.9% SLA.
  • •Target audiences differ: StackPath aims at developers/enterprises needing edge infrastructure; Cachefly targets gaming and video streaming services.
  • •Both lack free tiers, but StackPath’s pricing may be higher for low‑traffic apps per its cons.
  • •Regional coverage: StackPath lists global points of presence across NA, EU, APAC; Cachefly lists US, EU, APAC without detail.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are paid subscription only with no free tier; no price details provided to compare cost.

Tie

Uptime & reliability

Cachefly guarantees 99.99% SLA, higher than StackPath's 99.9% SLA.

Cachefly

Performance

Cachefly markets ultra‑low latency for video/gaming; StackPath emphasizes low latency but also adds compute overhead.

Cachefly

Developer experience

StackPath offers developer‑friendly APIs, IaC integration, and edge serverless capabilities; Cachefly mentions technical expertise needed but no dev APIs.

StackPath

Regions & compliance

StackPath lists global points of presence across NA, EU, APAC; Cachefly lists only US, EU, APAC without detail.

StackPath

Support & security

StackPath includes integrated enterprise‑grade WAF and automated SSL; Cachefly offers customizable SSL/TLS but no built‑in WAF.

StackPath

Lock‑in risk

Neither description provides details on contract length or migration tools; risk cannot be assessed.

Tie

Choose Cachefly if…

Gaming or video streaming services prioritizing ultra‑low latency CDN.

Choose StackPath if…

Enterprises needing edge compute, built‑in WAF, and extensive API control.

Common questions

Which service offers a higher uptime guarantee?

Cachefly guarantees 99.99% uptime; StackPath guarantees 99.9%.

Do either of them provide serverless edge computing?

Only StackPath mentions lightweight edge code execution (serverless).

Is there a free tier to try either platform?

Both products state they have no free tier.