FindAlternative
Back to MaxCDN

MaxCDN vs StackPath

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
MaxCDN
MaxCDNA powerful content delivery network designed to accelerate web performance globally.
Visit
ST
StackPathEdge computing and content delivery network platform designed for high-performance apps.
Visit
Overview
Description

MaxCDN was a prominent content delivery network (CDN) provider that helped developers and website owners speed up asset delivery by caching content on edge servers around the world. It offered robust cache control, instant purging, and detailed analytics to optimize website loading times and reduce origin server load. Although it was acquired and integrated into StackPath, MaxCDN remains well-known for pioneering developer-friendly CDN features and intuitive management panels that made high-performance content delivery accessible to websites of all sizes.

StackPath was a prominent edge computing and cloud services provider that offered content delivery network (CDN), edge compute, and web application firewall solutions. Its platform enabled developers to run workloads closer to end users to reduce latency and improve application responsiveness. Although StackPath wound down its primary edge and CDN services, it remains recognized for its developer-centric approach to distributed infrastructure and serverless edge scripting. The service empowered businesses to manage security, routing, and computing from a centralized control plane across global points of presence.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Content Delivery Network (CDN)
Best for
Developers and webmasters
Developers and enterprises needing edge infrastructure
Specifications
free tier
No
No
uptime sla
99.9%
99.9% availability
datacenter regions
US, EU, APAC
Global points of presence across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Developer-friendly API and integration tools
  • Fast and reliable global edge server network
  • Intuitive dashboard with easy-to-use purging options
  • Comprehensive real-time analytics and reporting
  • Low latency edge computing architecture
  • Robust built-in security and WAF capabilities
  • Developer-friendly API control plane
  • Comprehensive real-time analytics
Cons
  • No longer operating as a standalone independent service
  • Limited advanced edge computing features compared to modern serverless CDNs
  • Pricing could scale quickly for high-bandwidth users
  • Service availability and business pivots changed over time
  • Steeper learning curve for edge logic deployment
  • Pricing could be high for lower-traffic applications
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to MaxCDN

View all →
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

High-performance content delivery network for fast web asset distribution.

Compare
Gcore
Gcore

Fast global CDN with low latency and high capacity

Compare
Fastly
Fastly

An edge cloud platform delivering faster, safer, and more scalable sites and apps.

Compare
Bunny.net
Bunny.net

Fast and secure global CDN with edge storage and optimization

Compare

Alternatives to StackPath

View all →
Fly.io
Fly.io

Run full-stack apps and databases globally

Compare
Akamai
Akamai

A global content delivery network and cloud computing platform for web security.

Compare
Fastly
Fastly

An edge cloud platform delivering faster, safer, and more scalable sites and apps.

Compare
Gcore
Gcore

Fast global CDN with low latency and high capacity

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

MaxCDN offers a straightforward CDN with strong analytics and easy purging, while StackPath adds edge computing and built‑in security at the cost of complexity.

Key differences

  • •Edge computing: StackPath runs code at the edge; MaxCDN does not.
  • •Security features: StackPath includes WAF and DDoS mitigation; MaxCDN only offers SSL and token auth.
  • •Custom rules: MaxCDN focuses on caching/geo‑blocking; StackPath adds broader developer APIs and IaC integration.
  • •Network reach: MaxCDN limited to US/EU/APAC regions; StackPath claims global PoPs across NA, EU, APAC.
  • •Pricing scalability: Both are paid with no free tier, but MaxCDN’s costs can rise quickly with bandwidth; StackPath may be pricier for low‑traffic use cases.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both lack free tiers; MaxCDN’s pricing can scale quickly for high bandwidth, while StackPath may be high for low‑traffic apps.

MaxCDN

Uptime & reliability

Both guarantee 99.9% SLA/availability.

Tie

Performance

StackPath’s edge computing and global PoPs aim for ultra‑low latency beyond MaxCDN’s CDN‑only network.

StackPath

Developer experience

StackPath provides extensive APIs, IaC integration, and edge logic; MaxCDN offers a simpler dashboard and API.

StackPath

Regions & compliance

StackPath lists global PoPs across NA, EU, APAC; MaxCDN limited to US, EU, APAC.

StackPath

Support

Support details are not provided for either product.

Tie

Lock‑in

Lock‑in characteristics are not described in the provided facts.

Tie

Choose MaxCDN if…

Developers needing a pure CDN with easy cache purging and real‑time analytics, without edge compute or extra security layers.

Choose StackPath if…

Enterprises or developers requiring edge‑run code, built‑in WAF/DDoS protection, and broader global coverage.

Common questions

Which service includes built‑in security like a WAF?

StackPath includes an enterprise‑grade Web Application Firewall and DDoS mitigation; MaxCDN does not.

Do either of these offer a free tier for testing?

No, both MaxCDN and StackPath are paid services with no free tier.

If I only need CDN caching and simple analytics, which is simpler to use?

MaxCDN provides an intuitive dashboard, instant purge, and straightforward real‑time analytics, making it simpler for pure CDN needs.