cachet vs uptime-kuma
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Cachet is an open source, self-hosted status page system that allows users to create and manage their own status pages. It provides a simple and easy-to-use interface for creating and updating status pages, as well as a robust API for integrating with other tools and services.
Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted uptime and status page that allows you to monitor your websites and applications. It provides a simple and easy-to-use interface to create and manage your status pages.
- Highly customizable
- Easy to use and manage
- Robust API for integrations
- Open source and self-hosted
- Self-hosted solution for maximum control and security
- Customizable status pages with your own branding
- Real-time monitoring and alert system
- Support for multiple languages
- Limited support options
- Steep learning curve for advanced features
- Limited scalability options
- Not suitable for very large or complex systems
- Limited scalability
- Steep learning curve for customization
- Limited support for advanced features
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to cachet
View all →
Alternatives to uptime-kuma
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth tools are free, self‑hosted status page solutions; cachet focuses on incident management and API flexibility, while uptime‑kuma adds built‑in uptime monitoring and broader alert channels.
Key differences
- •Cachet includes dedicated incident‑management features; uptime‑kuma bundles real‑time uptime monitoring.
- •Primary language differs: cachet is PHP, uptime‑kuma is JavaScript, affecting ecosystem fit.
- •Key integrations vary: cachet offers Slack and PagerDuty; uptime‑kuma offers Discord and Telegram.
- •Cachet’s API is highlighted as robust; uptime‑kuma emphasizes custom plugins and themes.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Both note a steep learning curve for advanced features; no clear advantage.
Features & depth
Cachet provides built‑in incident management and system‑monitoring integration, beyond basic uptime checks.
Integrations & ecosystem
Each supports three major integrations; neither has a broader set.
Scalability
Both list limited scalability for very large or complex environments.
Support
Both rely on community forums and issue trackers; cachet adds email support, but overall parity.
Security & privacy
Both are self‑hosted, giving users full control over data and security.
Choose cachet if…
Teams needing incident management, PagerDuty integration, or a PHP‑based stack.
Choose uptime-kuma if…
Teams wanting built‑in uptime monitoring, Discord/Telegram alerts, or a JavaScript‑based stack.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both cachet and uptime‑kuma are free and open source.
Which tool includes built‑in uptime monitoring?
Uptime‑kuma provides real‑time website and application monitoring out of the box; cachet relies on external integrations.
Can I integrate with Slack or PagerDuty?
Cachet lists Slack and PagerDuty as key integrations; uptime‑kuma does not mention those services.