Call of Duty 3 vs Medal of Honor
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Step into the shoes of Allied soldiers as they fight across iconic WWII locations in this intense first‑person shooter. With a gripping single‑player campaign and robust multiplayer modes, Call of Duty 3 delivers fast‑paced action and authentic wartime atmosphere.
Set during World War II, Medal of Honor puts players in the boots of an elite operative behind enemy lines, delivering a cinematic campaign filled with intense firefights and covert missions. The game balances fast‑paced shooting with stealth tactics, offering both solo and cooperative experiences across multiple platforms.
- Authentic WWII settings
- Strong multiplayer variety
- Split‑screen co‑op support
- Solid weapon variety
- Engaging WWII storyline
- Strong blend of stealth and action
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Authentic weapon recreation
- Graphics dated by modern standards
- Limited map selection
- Occasional AI pathing issues
- Occasional AI glitches
- Multiplayer matchmaking can be slow
- Limited map variety
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Call of Duty 3
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
Alternatives to Medal of Honor
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth games cost $59.99 and hold a 74/100 critic score, but Medal of Honor emphasizes stealth with branching narratives while Call of Duty 3 focuses on cinematic set-pieces and split-screen co-op.
Key differences
- •Medal of Honor features a branching campaign narrative and stealth takedowns, whereas Call of Duty 3 uses scripted cinematic set-pieces on the Western Front.
- •Medal of Honor supports up to 16 players online with integrated voice chat, while Call of Duty 3 supports up to 12 players online.
- •Call of Duty 3 includes split-screen co-op on the same console, which is not specified for Medal of Honor.
- •Medal of Honor was released in October 2010 by Electronic Arts, whereas Call of Duty 3 launched in November 2006 by Activision.
Gameplay & fun factor
Both offer engaging WWII action with destructible environments and dynamic weather, though Medal of Honor adds stealth takedowns.
Platform availability
Specific platforms are not mentioned in the facts for either game.
Price & value
Both games share the exact same MSRP of $59.99 as a one-time paid purchase.
Multiplayer / co-op
Supports up to 16 online players with integrated voice chat, compared to Call of Duty 3's 12-player limit.
Content & replayability
Medal of Honor features a branching narrative with multiple mission outcomes, whereas Call of Duty 3 uses scripted set-pieces.
Difficulty & accessibility
Call of Duty 3 carries an ESRB T and PEGI 16 rating, making it slightly more accessible than Medal of Honor's M/PEGI 18 rating.
Graphics & performance
Both share a 74/100 critic score, though Call of Duty 3's graphics are noted as dated by modern standards and Medal of Honor has AI glitches.
Choose Call of Duty 3 if…
Gamers looking for split-screen same-console co-op and cinematic historical set-pieces.
Choose Medal of Honor if…
Players wanting branching campaign choices, stealth mechanics, and larger 16-player online matches.
Common questions
How much do these games cost?
Both Medal of Honor and Call of Duty 3 have an MSRP of $59.99 as paid, one-time purchases.
Do both games support local split-screen co-op?
Only Call of Duty 3 includes split-screen co-op for two players on the same console; local split-screen is not specified for Medal of Honor.
What are the critic scores for these titles?
Both Medal of Honor and Call of Duty 3 hold a critic score of 74/100.