FindAlternative
Back to Close Combat III: The Russian Front

Close Combat III: The Russian Front vs Company of Heroes 2

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Close Combat III: The Russian Front
Close Combat III: The Russian FrontTactical WWII battles on the Eastern Front
Company of Heroes 2
Company of Heroes 2Lead the Eastern Front in a brutal WWII real-time strategy experience.
Overview
Description

Close Combat III: The Russian Front puts you in command of Soviet and German forces during the brutal winter of 1942-43. The game blends real‑time strategy with realistic unit morale and supply mechanics, delivering a gritty simulation of historic battles. Play solo campaigns or pit your tactics against friends in multiplayer skirmishes, all on a detailed PC experience that captures the chaos of the Eastern Front.

Company of Heroes 2 puts players in command of Soviet or German forces during the harsh winter of the Eastern Front. The game blends tactical squad-level combat with strategic resource management, delivering intense, historically inspired battles. Featuring a dynamic weather system, destructible environments, and a deep multiplayer suite, the title offers both a compelling single-player campaign and robust co‑op and competitive modes for strategy enthusiasts.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
Real-Time Strategy
Real-Time Strategy
Best for
Strategy enthusiasts and WWII history fans
RTS and WWII strategy fans
Specifications
General
msrp
$49.9917%
$59.99
release date
1998-12-31
2013-06-25
Specifications
developer
Atomic Games
Relic Entertainment, Feral Interactive
publisher
Microsoft
Sega, Feral Interactive
age rating
ESRB E
PEGI 18, ESRB M
multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer
Single player, Multiplayer, Co-operative
critic score
78/100
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Deep morale and supply mechanics
  • Accurate historical representation
  • Robust multiplayer support
  • Extensive scenario editor
  • Deep tactical gameplay with realistic environmental effects.
  • Strong multiplayer modes with both competitive and co‑op options.
  • Rich historical setting and detailed campaign narrative.
  • Extensive modding support and community content.
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for newcomers
  • Graphics are dated by modern standards
  • Limited AI adaptability
  • Steep learning curve for new RTS players.
  • Occasional performance issues on older hardware.
  • Limited single‑player replayability after campaign completion.
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Close Combat III: The Russian Front

View all →
Close Combat
Close Combat

Experience realistic WWII tactical battles in real time

Compare
Close Combat: A Bridge Too Far
Close Combat: A Bridge Too Far

Relive the historic WWII bridge battles in real‑time tactical detail

Compare
People's General
People's General

Command Cold War forces in a classic turn‑based strategy experience

Compare
Company of Heroes
Company of Heroes

Intense WWII real‑time strategy that puts you in the heat of battle.

Compare

Alternatives to Company of Heroes 2

View all →
Company of Heroes
Company of Heroes

Intense WWII real‑time strategy that puts you in the heat of battle.

Compare
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts
Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts

Intense WWII RTS expansion with new fronts and fresh factions

Compare
Company of Heroes: Tales of Valor
Company of Heroes: Tales of Valor

Experience WWII’s fiercest battles in a fresh, tactical expansion

Compare
Men of War: Assault Squad
Men of War: Assault Squad

Intense WWII tactical battles in real‑time action

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Company of Heroes 2 offers modern graphics, richer campaign and mod support, while Close Combat III provides deeper morale/supply mechanics but with dated visuals.

Key differences

  • COH2 uses the Essence Engine for terrain deformation and dynamic weather; CC3 relies on older graphics.
  • COH2 includes a detailed single‑player campaign; CC3 focuses on historical scenarios without a narrative campaign.
  • COH2 offers co‑op campaign mode; CC3 only has competitive/co‑op multiplayer without a co‑op campaign.
  • CC3 features extensive morale and supply logistics; COH2’s ColdTech focuses on temperature effects rather than logistics.
  • COH2 provides robust Steam Workshop modding; CC3’s scenario editor is limited to custom battles.
DimensionWinner

Gameplay & fun factor

COH2 blends tactical pause, terrain destruction, and weather effects for varied battles, rated 78/100.

Company of Heroes 2

Platform availability

COH2 released for modern PCs (Windows, macOS via Feral); CC3 is a 1998 PC title with no recent ports.

Company of Heroes 2

Price & value

CC3 costs $49.99 vs COH2 $59.99, offering lower upfront cost.

Close Combat III: The Russian Front

Multiplayer / co‑op

COH2 supports 8‑player competitive, 4‑player co‑op campaigns; CC3 lacks co‑op campaign mode.

Company of Heroes 2

Content & replayability

COH2 adds extensive mod support via Steam Workshop; CC3 relies on its built‑in scenarios and editor.

Company of Heroes 2

Difficulty & accessibility

Both have steep learning curves, but CC3’s older UI is simpler; COH2’s complex systems raise barrier.

Close Combat III: The Russian Front

Graphics & performance

COH2 uses modern Essence Engine with realistic effects; CC3’s graphics are dated by modern standards.

Company of Heroes 2

Choose Close Combat III: The Russian Front if…

Players prioritizing deep morale/supply depth and lower price, tolerant of older graphics.

Choose Company of Heroes 2 if…

Players wanting modern RTS visuals, a story campaign, and strong co‑op multiplayer.

Common questions

Which game is cheaper?

Close Combat III costs $49.99; Company of Heroes 2 costs $59.99.

Do both games support co‑op campaigns?

Only Company of Heroes 2 offers a co‑op campaign; Close Combat III has multiplayer but no co‑op campaign.

Which title has more modern graphics and performance?

Company of Heroes 2 uses the Essence Engine with terrain deformation and dynamic weather, while Close Combat III’s graphics are dated.