cloudreve vs puter
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Cloudreve is an open‑source, self‑hosted file management platform that lets you create your own private cloud. It provides a web interface for uploading, organizing, and sharing files securely without relying on third‑party services. Designed for individuals and small teams, Cloudreve supports multiple storage back‑ends, user authentication, and fine‑grained permission controls, making it a flexible alternative to commercial cloud providers.
Puter is a self-hostable, open-source internet computer that allows users to create and manage their own online presence. It provides a free and decentralized alternative to traditional cloud services.
- Free and open‑source
- Self‑hosted gives full data control
- Supports many storage back‑ends
- Rich permission and sharing options
- Free and open-source
- Decentralized and secure
- Customizable and flexible
- Self-hostable and private
- Requires own server or VPS to run
- Limited official documentation compared to commercial products
- No built‑in mobile apps, only web access
- Steep learning curve for non-technical users
- Limited support and resources
- Dependent on community involvement and contributions
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to cloudreve
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth tools are free and open‑source, but Cloudreve is a ready‑to‑use self‑hosted file‑storage system, while Puter is a broader, decentralized compute platform that requires more technical setup.
Key differences
- •Purpose: Cloudreve focuses on file storage/sharing; Puter aims to provide a full self‑hosted internet compute environment.
- •Setup complexity: Cloudreve has a web dashboard and simpler install; Puter has a steep learning curve for non‑technical users.
- •Storage back‑ends: Cloudreve natively supports local disks, S3‑compatible services, and FTP; Puter’s storage model is not specified.
- •User interface: Cloudreve offers a responsive drag‑and‑drop web UI with thumbnails; Puter’s UI details are not specified.
- •Community size: Puter has more GitHub stars (42,968 vs 28,422), indicating a larger developer following.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open‑source, offering no subscription costs.
Ease of use / learning curve
Cloudreve provides a ready web dashboard; Puter is noted as having a steep learning curve for non‑technical users.
Features & depth
Cloudreve includes per‑user/folder permissions, shareable links, thumbnails, and WebDAV/API; Puter’s feature list is high‑level and less specific.
Integrations & ecosystem
Cloudreve supports local disk, S3‑compatible services, FTP, REST API, and WebDAV; Puter’s integration capabilities are not detailed.
Collaboration
Cloudreve offers per‑folder permissions and shareable links with expiration/password; Puter’s collaboration features are not specified.
Scalability
Puter’s decentralized architecture is designed for scaling across devices; Cloudreve scales with storage back‑ends but no decentralization claim.
Support
Cloudreve lists GitHub Issues and a Community Forum; Puter mentions limited support and reliance on community contributions.
Choose cloudreve if…
Teams needing straightforward self‑hosted file storage with UI and permission controls.
Choose puter if…
Tech‑savvy users wanting a customizable, decentralized internet‑compute platform.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either product?
Both Cloudreve and Puter are free and open‑source with no subscription fees.
Which solution is easier to set up for non‑technical staff?
Cloudreve provides a responsive web dashboard and simpler installation; Puter requires more technical knowledge.
Do both tools support integration with existing storage services like S3?
Cloudreve explicitly supports S3‑compatible services; Puter’s storage integration is not specified in the provided facts.