FindAlternative
Back to CockroachDB Cloud

CockroachDB Cloud vs ElephantSQL

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
CockroachDB Cloud
CockroachDB CloudA fully managed, distributed SQL database built for resilience and global scale.
ElephantSQL
ElephantSQLFully managed PostgreSQL databases in the cloud
Overview
Description

CockroachDB Cloud is a fully managed database-as-a-service (DBaaS) that delivers the elastic scale, relentless availability, and transactional integrity of CockroachDB without the operational overhead. It automatically distributes data across regions and cloud providers to ensure continuous uptime and low latency for modern applications. Designed for developers building mission-critical services, the platform simplifies database management with automated backups, rolling upgrades, and built-in resilience against node and zone failures. It combines the familiar interface of PostgreSQL with a distributed architecture capable of handling unpredictable workloads seamlessly.

ElephantSQL provides hosted PostgreSQL instances with automated backups, scaling, and monitoring. It supports developers, startups, and enterprises who need a reliable relational database without managing infrastructure. The service offers a free tier for small projects and a range of paid plans with higher storage, performance, and SLA guarantees. Deployments are available in multiple cloud regions and integrate with common CI/CD pipelines.

Pricing
Paid (Subscription)
Freemium
Category
Managed SQL Databases
Managed SQL Databases
Best for
Developers and enterprises building global apps
Developers and small teams
Specifications
free tier
Yes
Yes
uptime sla
99.99%
99.9%
datacenter regions
AWS, GCP, Azure across US, EU, and APAC
US, EU, APAC
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Exceptional high availability and fault tolerance
  • PostgreSQL compatibility reduces migration friction
  • Automated multi-region replication and scaling
  • Zero-downtime upgrades and schema migrations
  • Fully managed with automatic backups
  • Free tier for small projects
  • Multi‑region availability
  • Simple web UI and API
Cons
  • Higher cost compared to traditional single-node databases
  • Complex distributed query execution can occasionally impact performance
  • Steeper learning curve for optimal schema design in distributed environments
  • Limited to PostgreSQL only
  • Higher tiers can become costly for large workloads
  • No on‑premises deployment option
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to CockroachDB Cloud

View all →
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas

Fully managed MongoDB clusters across cloud providers

Compare
ScaleWay Database
ScaleWay Database

Fully managed PostgreSQL and MySQL databases deployed in seconds.

Compare
ElephantSQL
ElephantSQL

Fully managed PostgreSQL databases in the cloud

Compare
Xata
Xata

Managed Postgres with instant branching and copy‑on‑write clones

Compare

Alternatives to ElephantSQL

View all →
Xata
Xata

Managed Postgres with instant branching and copy‑on‑write clones

Compare
Heroku Postgres
Heroku Postgres

Fully managed, scalable SQL database service built seamlessly for Heroku developers.

Compare
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure

Enterprise-grade cloud platform offering high performance, security, and a generous free tier.

Compare
DigitalOcean Managed Databases
DigitalOcean Managed Databases

Worry-free fully managed database hosting for modern cloud applications.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

ElephantSQL is the simpler, lower‑cost choice for single‑node PostgreSQL workloads, while CockroachDB Cloud offers stronger availability and global scaling at the expense of complexity and potentially higher cost.

Key differences

  • ElephantSQL runs only standard PostgreSQL; CockroachDB provides a distributed, PostgreSQL‑compatible engine.
  • Uptime SLA: 99.9% vs 99.99% favoring CockroachDB.
  • CockroachDB supports automatic horizontal scaling of compute and storage; ElephantSQL scales vertically with downtime.
  • ElephantSQL offers a very small free tier (20 MB); CockroachDB’s free tier size isn’t specified.
  • CockroachDB has a steeper learning curve for schema design and distributed queries.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both offer freemium tiers; higher‑tier cost details are not specified, so value cannot be definitively compared.

Tie

Uptime & reliability

CockroachDB guarantees 99.99% SLA, higher than ElephantSQL's 99.9% SLA.

CockroachDB Cloud

Performance

No performance metrics provided for either; ElephantSQL is single‑node, CockroachDB is distributed, but impact is unspecified.

Tie

Developer experience

ElephantSQL provides a simple web console and REST API; CockroachDB is noted to have a steeper learning curve.

ElephantSQL

Regions & compliance

Both support multi‑region deployments across US, EU, and APAC on AWS, Azure, and GCP.

Tie

Support

Support details are not specified for either product.

Tie

Lock‑in

ElephantSQL is PostgreSQL‑only; CockroachDB is PostgreSQL‑compatible but a different engine, both create some vendor lock‑in.

Tie

Choose CockroachDB Cloud if…

Enterprises requiring high availability, global distribution, and horizontal scaling for relational workloads.

Choose ElephantSQL if…

Small teams needing a straightforward PostgreSQL DB with low cost and simple management.

Common questions

Can I run my existing PostgreSQL schema on CockroachDB Cloud?

Yes, CockroachDB maintains wire‑protocol compatibility with PostgreSQL, allowing most schemas to work with minimal changes.

What free‑tier storage does each service provide?

ElephantSQL offers 20 MB free storage; CockroachDB’s free‑tier storage amount is not specified.

How does multi‑region deployment differ between the two?

Both deploy across US, EU, APAC on major clouds, but CockroachDB adds granular data‑residency controls and automatic replication.