FindAlternative
Back to CrowdStrike Falcon

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Protection

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike FalconAI‑driven endpoint protection that stops breaches in real time
Symantec Endpoint Protection
Symantec Endpoint ProtectionComprehensive, AI‑driven protection for enterprise endpoints
Overview
Description

CrowdStrike Falcon delivers cloud‑native endpoint security using artificial intelligence and threat intelligence to detect, prevent, and respond to attacks across Windows, macOS, and Linux devices. Its lightweight agent runs without impacting performance while providing continuous monitoring and automated remediation. The platform integrates threat hunting, vulnerability management, and incident response into a single console, enabling security teams to reduce dwell time and simplify operations across the enterprise.

Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP) delivers integrated malware prevention, firewall, intrusion prevention, and device control across Windows, macOS, and Linux devices. It combines signature‑based detection with behavioral analytics to stop known and unknown threats before they compromise corporate networks. Managed centrally through a cloud‑based console, SEP provides real‑time visibility, automated policy enforcement, and detailed reporting, helping IT teams reduce attack surface and meet compliance requirements with minimal overhead.

Pricing
—
Paid (Subscription)
Category
Antivirus & Anti-Malware
Antivirus & Anti-Malware
Best for
Large enterprises and security teams
Enterprises and mid‑size organizations
Specifications
deployment
Cloud/SaaS
—
open source
No
No
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Email, Phone, 24/7 Live Chat, Dedicated Account Manager
Email, Phone, 24/7 Live Chat, Dedicated Account Manager
key integrations
Splunk, ServiceNow, Azure Sentinel, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Okta
Splunk, ServiceNow, Microsoft SCCM, VMware
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High detection accuracy with low false positives
  • Scalable cloud architecture eliminates on‑prem infrastructure
  • Comprehensive threat intelligence feeds
  • Integrated vulnerability management reduces tool sprawl
  • Comprehensive multi‑layered protection
  • Centralized cloud management console
  • Strong integration with Symantec threat intelligence
  • Supports major desktop operating systems
Cons
  • Pricing is enterprise‑focused and may be costly for small businesses
  • Limited on‑prem deployment options
  • Learning curve for advanced hunting features
  • Higher cost compared to basic antivirus solutions
  • Complex initial configuration for large environments
  • Limited mobile device management features
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to CrowdStrike Falcon

View all →
ESET PROTECT
ESET PROTECT

ESET's cloud-first, AI-native cybersecurity platform for business endpoint protection.

Compare
Sophos Home
Sophos Home

Enterprise-grade Sophos threat protection adapted for home PCs, Macs, and mobile devices.

Compare
Trend Micro Apex One
Trend Micro Apex One

AI-driven endpoint protection that stops threats before they strike

Compare
SentinelOne
SentinelOne

Autonomous AI‑driven endpoint protection and response

Compare

Alternatives to Symantec Endpoint Protection

View all →
SentinelOne
SentinelOne

Autonomous AI‑driven endpoint protection and response

Compare
Trend Micro Apex One
Trend Micro Apex One

AI-driven endpoint protection that stops threats before they strike

Compare
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon

AI‑driven endpoint protection that stops breaches in real time

Compare
ESET PROTECT
ESET PROTECT

ESET's cloud-first, AI-native cybersecurity platform for business endpoint protection.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

CrowdStrike Falcon offers cloud‑native, AI‑driven detection with integrated hunting and vulnerability management, but is enterprise‑priced; Symantec provides broader OS support and compliance reporting at a known subscription cost.

Key differences

  • •Deployment model: Falcon is cloud/SaaS only; Symantec offers on‑prem/cloud hybrid (implied by lack of cloud‑only note).
  • •Built‑in vulnerability management: Falcon includes it; Symantec only mentions vulnerability assessment tools.
  • •Device control: Symantec explicitly blocks unauthorized USB/peripherals; Falcon does not list this capability.
  • •Compliance reporting: Symantec provides detailed PCI‑DSS, HIPAA reports; Falcon’s compliance features not specified.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Falcon pricing is unknown and described as enterprise‑focused; Symantec has a defined paid subscription.

Symantec Endpoint Protection

Ease of use / learning curve

Falcon notes a learning curve for advanced hunting; Symantec’s console is described as unified and centralized.

Symantec Endpoint Protection

Features & depth

Falcon includes integrated threat hunting, automated containment, and built‑in vulnerability management.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Integrations & ecosystem

Falcon lists more security‑focused integrations (Azure Sentinel, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Okta) than Symantec.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Scalability

Falcon’s cloud architecture is highlighted as highly scalable for large enterprises.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Support

Both offer email, phone, 24/7 live chat, and a dedicated account manager.

Tie

Security & privacy

Falcon emphasizes AI‑driven detection with low false positives and real‑time containment.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Choose CrowdStrike Falcon if…

Large enterprises needing advanced threat hunting, integrated vulnerability management, and cloud‑scale protection.

Choose Symantec Endpoint Protection if…

Mid‑size to large organizations prioritizing known subscription pricing, compliance reporting, and device control.

Common questions

Which solution has a known subscription price?

Symantec Endpoint Protection lists a paid subscription; CrowdStrike Falcon’s pricing is not specified.

Do both products offer vulnerability management?

Falcon includes built‑in vulnerability management; Symantec mentions vulnerability assessment tools but not integrated management.

Which tool provides more security‑focused integrations?

Falcon integrates with Azure Sentinel, Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, and Okta, whereas Symantec lists Splunk, ServiceNow, SCCM, and VMware.