Cyberduck vs FileZilla Pro
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Cyberduck is an open‑source file transfer client that lets you browse and manage files on FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and a wide range of cloud services. It offers a simple graphical interface for uploading, downloading, and synchronizing data across servers and cloud storage. Available for macOS and Windows, Cyberduck supports bookmarks, transfer queues, and encryption, making it a reliable tool for developers, system administrators, and power users who need a versatile, cross‑platform solution.
FileZilla Pro extends the popular FileZilla client with support for a wide range of cloud storage services, allowing users to transfer files to and from Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and Cloudflare R2 alongside traditional FTP, FTPS, and SFTP protocols. The interface remains familiar and cross‑platform, offering a reliable solution for both everyday file transfers and complex deployment workflows. Designed for professionals, FileZilla Pro adds a unified transfer manager, site synchronization, and enterprise‑grade security features, while retaining the speed and simplicity that made the free version popular. A 30‑day money‑back guarantee ensures risk‑free evaluation for teams and individuals alike.
- Free and open‑source
- Supports a wide range of protocols
- Simple, intuitive UI
- Cross‑platform for macOS and Windows
- Unified interface for both traditional FTP and major cloud services
- Cross‑platform support on Windows, macOS, and Linux
- Robust site manager with saved credentials and transfer settings
- One‑time purchase with no recurring fees
- No native Linux package (requires manual install)
- Limited automation compared to command‑line tools
- No built‑in file versioning
- No native mobile apps for iOS or Android
- Limited automation compared to dedicated scripting tools
- No public API for custom integration
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Cyberduck
View all →Alternatives to FileZilla Pro
View all →The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataFileZilla Pro offers a paid, cross‑platform desktop client with built‑in cloud storage support, while Cyberduck is a free, open‑source option limited to macOS/Windows.
Key differences
- •Pricing model: FileZilla Pro requires a subscription; Cyberduck is free.
- •Platform support: FileZilla Pro runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux; Cyberduck officially supports only macOS and Windows.
- •Open‑source status: Cyberduck is open source; FileZilla Pro is proprietary.
- •Integration breadth: Both cover major cloud services, but FileZilla Pro adds Cloudflare R2; Cyberduck lists Microsoft Azure.
- •Support channels: FileZilla Pro offers email and ticket system; Cyberduck adds a community forum.
Pricing & value
Cyberduck is free, giving full functionality at no cost versus FileZilla Pro's subscription fee.
Ease of use / learning curve
FileZilla Pro provides a unified interface for FTP and cloud services with a robust Site Manager, easing setup.
Features & depth
FileZilla Pro includes built‑in file integrity checks and bandwidth throttling; Cyberduck lacks these specific features.
Integrations & ecosystem
Both support Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox; FileZilla adds Cloudflare R2, Cyberduck adds Microsoft Azure.
Collaboration
Cyberduck’s open‑source nature allows community contributions; FileZilla Pro has no public API for custom integration.
Support
FileZilla Pro offers dedicated email and ticket support, whereas Cyberduck relies on community forums.
Security & privacy
Both support FTPS/SFTP and client‑side encryption; no differences noted in the provided facts.
Choose Cyberduck if…
Developers or sysadmins preferring a free, open‑source tool on macOS/Windows without subscription costs.
Choose FileZilla Pro if…
IT admins or freelancers needing a supported, cross‑platform client with built‑in cloud sync and paid support.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use Cyberduck?
No, Cyberduck is listed as free.
Can I run FileZilla Pro on Linux?
Yes, it supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Does either product offer a public API for custom integration?
Both state "Api Available: No," so neither provides a public API.
