FindAlternative
Back to Dillo

Dillo vs Pale Moon

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Dillo
DilloFast, lightweight web browser for low‑resource systems
Pale Moon
Pale MoonAn open-source, customizable web browser focused on efficiency and control.
Overview
Description

Dillo is a minimalistic graphical web browser designed for speed and low memory consumption, making it ideal for older hardware and embedded devices. It supports basic HTML, CSS, and image formats while keeping the codebase small and efficient. The browser is open source, runs primarily on Linux and other Unix‑like systems, and offers a simple interface without the bloat of modern browsers. Dillo is often used in environments where resources are limited or where a fast, no‑frills browsing experience is required.

Pale Moon is an independent, open-source web browser derived from the Mozilla codebase, designed to offer a streamlined and efficient browsing experience. It prioritizes customization, user privacy, and traditional browser interfaces over heavy resource consumption or forced design overhauls. By maintaining its own optimized layout engine (Goanna), Pale Moon supports legacy extensions and classic browser features that modern mainstream browsers have dropped. It aims to put control back into the hands of the user, making it a reliable alternative for those who prefer a lightweight and highly configurable desktop browser.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Desktop Browsers
Desktop Browsers
Best for
Users of low‑resource or legacy computers
Privacy advocates and legacy extension users
Specifications
deployment
Desktop App
Desktop App
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
No
No
support options
Community Forums, Documentation
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Extremely low memory usage
  • Fast page rendering for simple sites
  • Open source and freely modifiable
  • Runs on very old hardware
  • Completely free and open source
  • Supports legacy add-ons and themes
  • Lightweight on system resources
  • Highly customizable interface and settings
Cons
  • No modern JavaScript support
  • Limited CSS capabilities
  • Sparse documentation and community support
  • Incompatible with standard WebExtensions
  • Smaller developer and extension ecosystem
  • May occasionally struggle with heavily optimized modern web frameworks
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Dillo

View all →
Falkon
Falkon

A lightweight KDE web browser built for privacy, security and deep customization

Compare
Qutebrowser
Qutebrowser

Keyboard‑focused, minimal web browser for power users

Compare
Pale Moon
Pale Moon

An open-source, customizable web browser focused on efficiency and control.

Compare

Alternatives to Pale Moon

View all →
Waterfox
Waterfox

A privacy-focused web browser built on the source code of Firefox.

Compare
Mozilla Firefox
Mozilla Firefox

The fast, private, and independent web browser that puts your security first.

Compare
LibreWolf
LibreWolf

A privacy-focused, freedom-loving fork of the Mozilla Firefox browser.

Compare
Vivaldi
Vivaldi

A highly customizable and feature-rich web browser built for power users.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Pale Moon offers a more complete, customizable browsing experience with legacy add‑on support, while Dillo trades features for ultra‑low resource usage and minimal JavaScript support.

Key differences

  • Rendering engine: Pale Moon uses Goanna (full HTML/CSS/JS); Dillo uses a tiny HTML/CSS2 engine with no modern JavaScript.
  • Extension ecosystem: Pale Moon supports XUL/XPCOM add‑ons; Dillo has essentially no extension support.
  • Resource consumption: Dillo runs under ~5 MB RAM; Pale Moon uses more memory but still lightweight compared to mainstream browsers.
  • Web compatibility: Pale Moon can handle most modern sites (though not WebExtensions); Dillo only works well on simple pages.
  • User interface: Pale Moon retains a classic desktop UI; Dillo provides a minimal toolbar only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open source, offering no cost advantage over the other.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Pale Moon offers a familiar desktop UI and documentation; Dillo’s minimal UI can be confusing for typical web tasks.

Pale Moon

Features & depth

Pale Moon supports full HTML/CSS/JS and legacy extensions; Dillo lacks modern JavaScript and CSS capabilities.

Pale Moon

Integrations & ecosystem

Pale Moon has a community of XUL/XPCOM add‑ons; Dillo has no extension ecosystem.

Pale Moon

Support

Pale Moon lists community forums and documentation; Dillo notes sparse documentation and limited community support.

Pale Moon

Security & privacy

Dillo’s lack of JavaScript reduces attack surface; Pale Moon runs full web code which can expose more vulnerabilities.

Dillo

Choose Dillo if…

Users on very low‑resource or legacy hardware needing a minimal, fast browser for simple pages.

Choose Pale Moon if…

Users who need a functional modern browser with legacy add‑on support and moderate system resources.

Common questions

Can either browser run modern web applications that rely on JavaScript?

Pale Moon supports JavaScript (though not WebExtensions); Dillo does not support modern JavaScript.

Which browser uses less memory?

Dillo typically uses under 5 MB RAM; Pale Moon uses more memory but is still lighter than mainstream browsers.

Is there any official support or paid help available?

Both rely on community forums and documentation only; no paid support is listed.