Duplicati vs Zerobyte
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
Duplicati is a free, open-source backup client that securely stores encrypted, incremental, compressed backups on cloud storage services and remote file servers. It works with standard protocols like FTP, SSH, WebDAV as well as popular services like Microsoft OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive, box.com, Mega, hubiC and many others.
zerobyte is a backup automation tool designed for self-hosters, built on top of restic. It simplifies the process of backing up data, ensuring that important files and information are safely stored and easily recoverable in case of data loss or system failure. With zerobyte, users can automate their backup processes, reducing the risk of data loss and minimizing downtime.
- Free and open-source
- Supports a wide range of cloud storage services and remote file servers
- Encrypts backups to ensure data security and confidentiality
- Compresses backups to reduce storage space requirements
- Easy to use and configure
- Highly customizable backup schedules and retention policies
- Supports various cloud storage services
- Open source and free to use
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Limited user interface and user experience
- May require technical expertise for configuration and troubleshooting
- Limited support for certain storage services
- May require technical expertise for advanced configuration
- Limited user interface and user experience
- Dependent on restic for backup functionality
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Duplicati
View all →
Alternatives to Zerobyte
View all →
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth Zerobyte and Duplicati are free, open‑source backup tools, but Zerobyte is tighter‑integrated with Restic and offers an API, while Duplicati supports more cloud providers and built‑in compression.
Key differences
- •Zerobyte relies on Restic for backup engine; Duplicati implements its own engine.
- •Duplicati lists many more native cloud integrations (OneDrive, Box, Mega, etc.) than Zerobyte.
- •Zerobyte provides an API for automation; Duplicati does not.
- •Zerobyte’s support is via Discord and GitHub Issues; Duplicati relies on community docs only.
- •Zerobyte is written in TypeScript and self‑hosted; Duplicati is a C# application with a GUI.
Pricing & value
Both are free and open source, offering comparable cost‑free value.
Ease of use / learning curve
Both have limited UI, but Duplicati’s GUI and documentation give slightly easier onboarding.
Features & depth
Zerobyte adds Restic’s proven deduplication and encryption plus an API for custom automation.
Integrations & ecosystem
Duplicati natively supports many more cloud services (OneDrive, Box, Mega, etc.) than Zerobyte.
Support
Zerobyte offers real‑time Discord help and GitHub issue tracking; Duplicati only has community docs.
Security & privacy
Both encrypt backups; Zerobyte relies on Restic’s encryption, Duplicati provides its own encryption.
Scalability / automation
Zerobyte’s API and Restic backend enable easier large‑scale scripting and integration.
Choose Duplicati if…
Admins who prioritize broad cloud provider support and a GUI with less custom scripting.
Choose Zerobyte if…
Self‑hosters needing Restic reliability, API automation, and willing to handle a steeper setup.
Common questions
Is there any cost to use either tool?
Both Zerobyte and Duplicati are free and open source.
Which tool supports more cloud storage services out of the box?
Duplicati supports a wider range, including OneDrive, Box, Mega, and others.
Can I automate backups via an API?
Only Zerobyte provides an API; Duplicati does not.