Earnest Evans vs Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.


Set in the 1930s, famed archaeologist Earnest Evans discovers three world‑shattering idols scattered by the wind god Hastur. Injured before he can retrieve them, his quest is left unfinished. Fifty years later, his grandson Earnest must locate the idols and prevent global catastrophe. This classic platform‑action title blends exploration, puzzle solving, and combat in a retro adventure setting.
Indy embarks on a globe‑spanning quest to locate the mythical Staff of Moses, battling Nazis, Panamanian hunters, and Tong thugs along the way. The story unfolds as you travel to exotic locales, solve puzzles, and collect artifacts that unlock new paths and secrets. The game blends classic platforming with action‑adventure combat, offering both single‑player and cooperative split‑screen modes. Players experience cinematic cutscenes and a rich historical setting while hunting for the ultimate relic.
- Authentic 90s pixel art style
- Engaging mix of platforming and puzzles
- Compelling retro storyline
- Challenging boss encounters
- Engaging globe‑spanning storyline
- Co‑op split‑screen adds replay value
- Varied combat against distinct enemy types
- Rich historical environments
- Limited save system
- Occasional stiff controls
- Graphics may feel dated to new players
- Repetitive platforming sections
- Mixed critical reception reflected in low score
- Occasional camera issues in tight spaces
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Earnest Evans
View all →
Adventure across the globe to uncover the legendary Staff of Moses.

A retro sci‑fi platform adventure to reclaim lost memories across six perilous levels.
Alternatives to Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings
View all →
Adventure meets action in a time‑bending Indiana Jones quest

A treasure‑hunting adventure that blends cinematic action with daring platforming.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataIndiana Jones offers modern 3D adventure with co‑op for $60, while Earnest Evans is a cheap retro platformer at $20 with single‑player focus.
Key differences
- •Co‑op support: Indiana Jones includes split‑screen multiplayer; Earnest Evans is single‑player only.
- •Price: Indiana Jones costs $59.99; Earnest Evans costs $19.99.
- •Graphics era: Indiana Jones uses 2009 3D visuals; Earnest Evans uses 1991 pixel art.
- •Critical reception: Indiana Jones has a 50/100 critic score; Earnest Evans has no listed score.
- •Gameplay style: Indiana Jones mixes combat, puzzles, and exploration across global locations; Earnest Evans is a side‑scrolling platformer with retro puzzles.
Gameplay & fun factor
Indiana Jones combines combat, puzzles, and co‑op across varied settings, whereas Earnest Evans is limited to side‑scrolling platforming.
Platform availability
No platform information provided for either title.
Price & value
Earnest Evans costs $19.99 versus Indiana Jones at $59.99, offering lower upfront cost.
Multiplayer / co‑op
Indiana Jones supports split‑screen co‑op; Earnest Evans is single‑player only.
Content & replayability
Indiana Jones features globe‑spanning levels and co‑op replay value; Earnest Evans has limited save and single‑player focus.
Difficulty & accessibility
Indiana Jones has occasional camera issues but generally smoother controls; Earnest Evans suffers from stiff controls and limited saves.
Graphics & performance
Indiana Jones uses modern 2009 3D graphics; Earnest Evans relies on dated 1991 pixel art.
Choose Earnest Evans if…
Buyers seeking a cheap retro platformer experience and don’t need multiplayer.
Choose Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings if…
Buyers who want modern 3D adventure, co‑op play, and are okay paying a premium.
Common questions
Which game is cheaper?
Earnest Evans costs $19.99; Indiana Jones costs $59.99.
Do either games support multiplayer?
Only Indiana Jones offers split‑screen co‑op; Earnest Evans is single‑player only.
What is the critical reception of Indiana Jones?
Indiana Jones received a critic score of 50/100, indicating mixed reviews.


