Epson EcoTank ET-4800 vs Xerox B215
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The Epson EcoTank ET-4800 is a versatile all-in-one inkjet printer designed for home offices and small businesses. It features refillable ink tanks, an automatic document feeder (ADF), and a compact design that saves space. With its cartridge-free system, users can enjoy significant cost savings on ink replacements. The printer also supports wireless connectivity, making it easy to print from mobile devices and computers.
The Xerox B215 is a versatile 4-in-1 multifunction printer designed to bring high productivity and security to small workteams. Combining print, copy, scan, and fax capabilities into a single compact device, it offers intuitive touchscreen operation and robust wireless connectivity. Built to handle everyday office demands efficiently, it delivers sharp text and graphics at fast print speeds while integrating mobile printing support and advanced document management features to streamline daily workflows.
- Cost-effective with refillable ink tanks
- Compact design saves space
- Automatic document feeder for easy scanning and copying
- Wireless printing for convenience
- Fast monochrome print speeds up to 31 ppm
- Comprehensive 4-in-1 multifunction capabilities
- Built-in Wi-Fi and mobile printing support
- Intuitive 3.5-inch color touchscreen interface
- Limited paper capacity
- No touchscreen display
- No Ethernet connectivity
- Monochrome printing only with no color capability
- Initial setup of wireless network can be tricky
- Replacement high-yield toner cartridges can be expensive
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Epson EcoTank ET-4800
View all →
All-in-one color inkjet printer built for high-volume business productivity.
Compact wireless all-in-one printer for home offices and small workgroups.
Alternatives to Xerox B215
View all →All-in-one color inkjet printer built for high-volume business productivity.
Secure color multifunction laser printer with wireless connectivity and touch screen
Compact monochrome laser printer with fast duplex printing and wireless networking.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataThe Xerox B215 is the cheaper, faster monochrome laser with Ethernet; the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 costs more upfront but adds color printing and lower long‑term ink costs.
Key differences
- •Print speed: 31 ppm (Xerox) vs 15 ppm mono / 8 ppm color (Epson).
- •Color capability: Xerox monochrome only; Epson full‑color inkjet.
- •Running cost: Xerox uses replaceable toner cartridges (expensive); Epson uses refillable ink tanks (cost‑effective).
- •Paper handling: Xerox 40‑sheet ADF vs Epson 30‑sheet ADF and 250‑sheet tray.
- •Connectivity: Xerox includes Ethernet; Epson lacks Ethernet but adds USB‑C and Wi‑Fi Direct.
Performance
Xerox prints up to 31 ppm mono, nearly double Epson's 15 ppm mono speed.
Build quality
Epson weighs ~8.1 kg (17.9 lb) versus Xerox 11.45 kg, making Epson lighter and more portable.
Connectivity
Xerox offers Wi‑Fi, Ethernet, and USB 2.0; Epson lacks Ethernet, offering only Wi‑Fi, Wi‑Fi Direct, USB‑C.
Power & efficiency
No specific power consumption data provided for either model.
Compatibility
Epson prints in color with refillable ink tanks; Xerox is monochrome only.
Price & value
Xerox MSRP $299 vs Epson $499, giving a lower initial outlay.
Warranty & support
Epson includes a 2‑year warranty; Xerox provides a 1‑year limited warranty.
Choose Epson EcoTank ET-4800 if…
Home office or small business requiring color prints, low long‑term ink cost, and compact footprint.
Choose Xerox B215 if…
Small office needing fast mono prints, Ethernet networking, and lower upfront cost.
Common questions
Which printer is cheaper to buy?
The Xerox B215 costs $299 MSRP, while the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 costs $499 MSRP.
Can I print in color with either model?
Only the Epson EcoTank ET-4800 supports color printing; the Xerox B215 is monochrome only.
What are the ongoing consumable costs?
Xerox uses replaceable toner cartridges (noted as expensive); Epson uses refillable ink tanks, which are generally more cost‑effective over time.