FindAlternative
Back to Forgejo

Forgejo vs Onedev

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Forgejo
ForgejoSelf-hosted, lightweight Git forge for collaborative software development.
Onedev
OnedevAll‑in‑one self‑hosted Git, CI/CD and DevOps platform
Overview
Description

Forgejo is a self-hosted, community-owned software forge that provides Git repository hosting, issue tracking, pull requests, and CI/CD integration in a lightweight package. Created in 2022 as an independent fork in the Gitea lineage, it is built to run comfortably on modest hardware, from a Raspberry Pi to a small cloud VM, while still supporting larger organizational deployments. Forgejo is developed entirely as Free Software (GPLv3-or-later for current releases) and is positioned as a privacy-respecting, non-corporate alternative to GitHub and GitLab. It includes federation features via ActivityPub, letting instances interact across a decentralized network, and is maintained by a community-driven project rather than a single company.

OneDev is a self‑hosted solution that combines Git repository management, continuous integration, code review, and issue tracking in a single web interface. It is designed for development teams and DevOps engineers who want full control over their development workflow without relying on external services. The platform integrates tightly with Docker and Kubernetes, enabling automated builds, deployments, and environment provisioning. Being free and open source, OneDev can be deployed on‑premises and customized via its extensible plugin system, while support is provided through documentation and email.

Pricing
Free
Free
Category
Version Control
DevOps & CI/CD
Best for
Developers and organizations wanting a self-hosted, open-source Git forge
Development teams and DevOps engineers
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community forums, chat, and documentation
Email, Documentation
key integrations
Docker, Docker Compose, ActivityPub federation, Forgejo Actions (CI/CD)
Git, Docker, Kubernetes
github stars
15,112
primary language
Java
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Completely free, open source, and community-governed with no vendor lock-in
  • Lightweight enough to self-host on very modest hardware
  • Familiar Git forge workflow (PRs, issues, wiki) similar to GitHub/GitLab
  • Built-in CI/CD via Forgejo Actions avoids needing a separate pipeline tool
  • Free and open source
  • All‑in‑one platform reduces tool sprawl
  • Self‑hosted gives full data control
  • Tight integration with Docker and Kubernetes
Cons
  • Requires self-hosting and ongoing server maintenance (no official managed cloud offering)
  • Smaller plugin/integration ecosystem than GitHub or GitLab
  • Federation features are still maturing compared to core forge functionality
  • Limited third‑party plugin ecosystem compared to larger platforms
  • User interface can feel dense for new users
  • Enterprise‑level support requires external contracts
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Forgejo

View all →
Gitea
Gitea

A painless self‑hosted Git service for teams

Compare
Onedev
Onedev

All‑in‑one self‑hosted Git, CI/CD and DevOps platform

Compare

Alternatives to Onedev

View all →
Gitea
Gitea

A painless self‑hosted Git service for teams

Compare
Huly
Huly

An open-source, all-in-one project management platform combining issues, chat, and docs.

Compare
GitLab
GitLab

The most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform

Compare
GitHub
GitHub

Git hosting, code review, and CI/CD for software teams.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both are free, self‑hosted Git platforms, but Forgejo is ultra‑lightweight with GitHub‑style UI and built‑in Actions, while OneDev offers deeper CI/CD pipelines and native Kubernetes support.

Key differences

  • Forgejo runs on very low‑resource hardware (e.g., Raspberry Pi); OneDev requires more resources (Java‑based).
  • CI/CD: Forgejo uses Forgejo Actions compatible with GitHub Actions; OneDev uses its own YAML pipeline engine with parallel stages.
  • Federation: Forgejo includes ActivityPub federation; OneDev does not.
  • Kubernetes integration: Only OneDev lists native Kubernetes deployment support.
  • Ecosystem: OneDev lists 15k+ GitHub stars and tighter Docker/K8s integration; Forgejo has a smaller plugin ecosystem.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are free and open source, offering full functionality without license cost.

Tie

Ease of use / learning curve

Forgejo mimics GitHub/GitLab UI, making it familiar for new users; OneDev’s dense UI can feel steep.

Forgejo

Features & depth

OneDev provides fine‑grained access control, LDAP, advanced YAML pipelines, and Kubernetes deployment; Forgejo’s feature set is lighter.

Onedev

Integrations & ecosystem

OneDev lists Docker and Kubernetes native support and has 15,112 GitHub stars; Forgejo’s integrations are limited to Docker, Docker Compose, ActivityPub.

Onedev

Collaboration

Forgejo offers familiar pull‑request workflow, issue tracker, wiki, and ActivityPub federation for cross‑instance collaboration.

Forgejo

Scalability

OneDev’s Java architecture and Kubernetes integration suit larger, container‑orchestrated deployments; Forgejo targets small‑scale setups.

Onedev

Support

Forgejo provides community forums, chat, and documentation; OneDev lists only email and documentation, with enterprise support external.

Forgejo

Choose Forgejo if…

Small teams needing a lightweight, GitHub‑like UI on minimal hardware.

Choose Onedev if…

Medium‑to‑large teams requiring advanced CI pipelines and Kubernetes deployment.

Common questions

Can I run either platform on a Raspberry Pi?

Forgejo is designed for low‑resource hardware like a Raspberry Pi; OneDev’s Java stack is not specified for such devices.

Which tool offers more advanced CI/CD capabilities?

OneDev provides a native YAML pipeline engine with parallel stages and Kubernetes deployment; Forgejo uses Forgejo Actions compatible with GitHub Actions.

Is there any vendor‑managed hosting option?

Both products are self‑hosted only; no official managed cloud offering is mentioned.