FindAlternative
Back to Gitea

Gitea vs GitLab

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Gitea
GiteaA painless self‑hosted Git service for teams
GitLab
GitLabThe most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform
Overview
Description

Gitea is a lightweight, open‑source Git platform that you can run on your own servers. It provides a clean web UI, issue tracking, pull requests, and CI integration without the overhead of larger solutions. Designed for developers and teams, Gitea runs on Windows, macOS, Linux and via any web browser. It is free to use and supported by an active community and comprehensive documentation.

GitLab is a web-based DevOps lifecycle tool that provides a Git-repository manager providing wiki, issue-tracking and continuous integration.

Pricing
Free
Freemium

Free tier available; Premium starts at $29/user/month, self-managed options available.

Category
Version Control
Version Control
Best for
Developers and teams
Engineering teams needing an all-in-one DevOps platform
Specifications
Spec source
AI-estimated
AI-estimated
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
57,009
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community support, Documentation
Docs, Community Forum, Enterprise Support
key integrations
Git, GitHub, GitLab
Kubernetes, Slack, Jira
primary language
Go
platforms
Web, Mac, Windows, Linux
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Free and open‑source
  • Lightweight and easy to install
  • Cross‑platform support
  • Active community and documentation
  • All-in-one DevOps platform reduces tool sprawl
  • Mature, powerful CI/CD
  • Strong self-managed option
  • Good built-in security scanning
Cons
  • Limited advanced enterprise features compared to paid SaaS solutions
  • Self‑hosting requires own infrastructure maintenance
  • Feature set may lag behind rapidly evolving competitors
  • Smaller open-source community than GitHub
  • UI can be complex due to feature breadth
  • Self-managed setup requires more ops effort
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
8
User rating
Not enough data
3.5 (2)

What reviewers say

Gitea Reviews

No reviews yet.

GitLab Reviews

3.5 (2)
Anonymous

Works, with some caveats

Mixed feelings about GitLab after using it for a while. On the plus side, all-in-one devops platform reduces tool sprawl. That said, smaller open-source community than github, which held us back from rating it higher.

Anonymous

Does exactly what we need

GitLab has quickly become part of our daily workflow. Good built-in security scanning. One minor gripe: ui can be complex due to feature breadth, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend to anyone considering it.

Read all reviews →

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Gitea

View all →
Onedev
Onedev

All‑in‑one self‑hosted Git, CI/CD and DevOps platform

Compare
GitLab
GitLab

The most comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform

Compare
SolidTime
SolidTime

Time tracking and invoicing for freelancers and small teams

Compare

Alternatives to GitLab

View all →
GitHub
GitHub

Git hosting, code review, and CI/CD for software teams.

Compare
Jira
Jira

The #1 software development tool used by agile teams

Compare
Linear
Linear

Fast, opinionated issue tracking built for software teams.

Compare
semaphore
semaphore

Accelerate DevOps workflows with a cloud‑native CI/CD platform

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

GitLab offers a comprehensive, integrated DevSecOps suite with strong CI/CD and security at a cost, while Gitea provides a free, lightweight self‑hosted Git service with basic features.

Key differences

  • GitLab includes built‑in CI/CD pipelines, container registry, and Kubernetes integration; Gitea’s CI is lightweight and relies on external providers for advanced pipelines.
  • GitLab offers a freemium model with paid tiers for enterprise features; Gitea is completely free and open‑source.
  • GitLab provides a self‑managed deployment option with enterprise support; Gitea relies on community support only.
  • GitLab’s security scanning (dependency, SAST, etc.) is integrated; Gitea lacks built‑in advanced security tooling.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Gitea is free; GitLab’s premium tier starts at $29/user/month for added features.

Gitea

Ease of use / learning curve

Gitea is lightweight and easy to install, whereas GitLab’s broad feature set can make the UI complex.

Gitea

Features & depth

GitLab provides full CI/CD, container registry, Kubernetes, and integrated security scanning; Gitea offers basic CI and issue tracking.

GitLab

Integrations & ecosystem

GitLab integrates with Kubernetes, Slack, Jira and has a large app ecosystem; Gitea’s integrations are limited to GitHub, GitLab, and basic webhooks.

GitLab

Collaboration

GitLab includes planning, issue boards, and merge request workflows in one platform; Gitea provides issue tracking and PRs but fewer planning tools.

GitLab

Scalability

GitLab supports large enterprise deployments with self‑hosted and SaaS options; Gitea is designed for smaller teams and may need extra tooling for scale.

GitLab

Support

GitLab offers enterprise support options; Gitea relies on community support and documentation only.

GitLab

Security & privacy

GitLab includes built‑in dependency, SAST, and other security scans; Gitea does not provide comparable native security features.

GitLab

Migration / lock‑in

Gitea’s simple, open‑source codebase eases migration; GitLab’s richer feature set can create higher lock‑in risk.

Gitea

Choose Gitea if…

Small teams or startups wanting a free, easy‑to‑install Git service.

Choose GitLab if…

Enterprises needing integrated CI/CD, security, and enterprise support.

Common questions

Can I start with GitLab for free and later add paid features?

Yes, GitLab offers a free tier and premium tiers start at $29/user/month for additional capabilities.

Does Gitea include built‑in security scanning?

No, Gitea does not provide native security or dependency scanning.

Which tool is easier to self‑host?

Gitea is lightweight and can be deployed via Docker or binary packages; GitLab’s self‑hosted setup requires more operational effort.