FindAlternative
Back to Glances

Glances vs StatusCake

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Glances
GlancesCross‑platform real‑time system monitoring for admins and DevOps
Visit
StatusCake
StatusCakeExternal uptime, performance, SSL, and domain monitoring for websites and servers.
Visit
Overview
Description

Glances is an open‑source, cross‑platform monitoring tool that provides a concise, real‑time view of system resources such as CPU, memory, disk I/O, network, and processes. It runs on Linux, Windows, macOS and can be accessed via a web interface, making it ideal for both local and remote monitoring. Designed for system administrators and DevOps teams, Glances aggregates metrics into a single dashboard, supports customizable alerts, and integrates with scripts or APIs for automated workflows. Its lightweight design ensures minimal overhead while delivering comprehensive performance insights.

StatusCake is a website and infrastructure monitoring platform offering uptime monitoring, page speed tracking, SSL certificate expiration alerts, domain expiry and DNS monitoring, and server health monitoring. Paid plans check sites as frequently as every 30 seconds from more than 30 global monitoring locations.

Pricing
Free
Freemium
Category
Monitoring & Logging
Monitoring & Logging
Best for
System Administrators and DevOps teams
Developers, DevOps teams, and businesses needing external uptime and performance monitoring
Specifications
open source
Yes
No
github stars
33,155
—
api available
No
Yes
support options
Email, GitHub Issues
Email support, dedicated support on Enterprise
key integrations
InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Cassandra, Kafka, RabbitMQ, Docker
Google Single Sign-On, alert integrations
primary language
Python
—
deployment
—
Cloud/SaaS
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open‑source and free
  • Runs on all major operating systems
  • Lightweight with low resource overhead
  • Extensible via plugins and API
  • Free tier includes 10 monitors, useful for small projects
  • Checks as frequent as 30 seconds on the Business plan
  • Covers uptime, SSL, domain, and page speed monitoring in one platform
  • Long track record, serving over 220,000 customers since 2012
Cons
  • No native mobile app
  • Limited built‑in visualization compared to commercial tools
  • Alerting requires manual configuration or external scripts
  • Free tier's 5-minute check interval is slower than paid competitors' free tiers in some cases
  • Specific paid plan prices are not listed publicly and require visiting the pricing page
  • Advanced team and reporting features are reserved for higher-priced tiers
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Glances

View all →
Grafana
Grafana

Composable observability platform

Compare
netdata
netdata

Real-time system monitoring and performance troubleshooting

Compare
Gatus
Gatus

Self-hosted open-source monitoring and alerting for DevOps teams

Compare
mectrics
mectrics

A free, open-source menu bar app that shows your Mac's CPU, memory, battery, and more.

Compare

Alternatives to StatusCake

View all →
uptime-kuma
uptime-kuma

Self-hosted uptime and status page

Compare
Pingdom
Pingdom

Website uptime and performance monitoring from SolarWinds with global check locations and public status pages.

Compare
Cronitor
Cronitor

Developer-focused monitoring for cron jobs, uptime, APIs, and background tasks.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Glances is a free, open‑source, cross‑platform system monitor you run yourself; StatusCake is a SaaS uptime/SSL monitor with a free tier but paid plans for faster checks and team features.

Key differences

  • •Deployment model – Glances runs locally on any OS; StatusCake is cloud‑hosted SaaS.
  • •Primary focus – Glances monitors OS‑level resources; StatusCake monitors website availability, SSL and domain health.
  • •Pricing structure – Glances is completely free; StatusCake offers a limited free tier and paid plans.
  • •Collaboration tools – StatusCake provides public/private status pages and alert routing; Glances has no built‑in team features.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Glances is fully free and open‑source; StatusCake’s free tier is limited and higher tiers require paid subscription.

Glances

Ease of use / learning curve

StatusCake’s web UI requires no installation, while Glances needs CLI knowledge and configuration.

StatusCake

Features & depth

Both provide deep monitoring in their domains – system metrics for Glances, uptime/SSL/page speed for StatusCake.

Tie

Integrations & ecosystem

Glances integrates with InfluxDB, Prometheus, Elasticsearch, Docker, etc.; StatusCake lists only SSO and basic alert integrations.

Glances

Collaboration

StatusCake includes status pages and configurable alert routing for teams; Glances lacks built‑in collaboration features.

StatusCake

Support

StatusCake offers email support and dedicated enterprise support; Glances relies on GitHub issues and community email.

StatusCake

Choose Glances if…

Sysadmins or DevOps needing free, on‑premise, extensible OS‑level monitoring.

Choose StatusCake if…

Teams that need external website uptime, SSL, and domain monitoring with shared status pages.

Common questions

Can I use Glances to monitor remote servers without installing anything on them?

Glances includes a built‑in web server; you can view metrics remotely via a browser after installing it on each server.

Does StatusCake provide API access for automating checks?

Yes, StatusCake offers an API; Glances does not have an official API according to the specs.

Which tool scales better for monitoring hundreds of servers or sites?

StatusCake’s SaaS model scales automatically for many sites; Glances can scale via export to InfluxDB but requires self‑managed infrastructure.