Intel Core Ultra 7 356H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a high-performance mobile processor designed for demanding applications. With 16 cores, it offers exceptional processing power and efficiency.
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is a revolutionary CPU built on the advanced TSMC N3B process node, combining 16 cores and 16 threads with a 5.4 GHz boost clock. Engineered for elite mobile systems, it delivers exceptional efficiency and computing power for intensive workloads. Equipped with powerful Intel Arc 140T integrated graphics and advanced architecture, this processor excels at high-end gaming, complex content creation, and professional productivity applications without requiring a discrete GPU for basic visual tasks.
- High-performance processing power
- Efficient power management
- Secure architecture
- Portable design
- Exceptional multi-core and single-core performance for mobile devices
- Powerful integrated Intel Arc graphics capability
- Advanced 3nm TSMC N3B process node for improved efficiency
- Dedicated NPU support for modern AI tasks
- High power consumption
- Expensive
- Limited availability
- High maximum turbo power draw of 115W requires robust cooling
- Limited to laptop and mobile form factors via FCBGA2049 socket
- Premium pricing tier positioning for high-end systems
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
View all →A high-performance mobile processor designed for gamers and demanding creators.
A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.
Alternatives to Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
View all →A powerful processor combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c architectures for next-gen computing.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataProduct A offers higher thread count (32 threads vs 16) and a lower base power profile, while Product B provides higher boost clock speeds (5.4 GHz vs 5.0 GHz) and higher maximum turbo power (115W). The main trade-off is between Product A's multi-threading focus with lower base TDP (15-25W) and Product B's higher single-core boost and higher maximum power envelope.
Key differences
- •Thread count: Product A features 32 threads, whereas Product B features 16 threads.
- •Clock speeds: Product A has a 3.6 GHz base and 5.0 GHz boost clock, while Product B has a 2.9 GHz P-core base and 5.4 GHz boost clock.
- •Power consumption: Product A operates at a 15-25W TDP (boosting up to 80W/64W), while Product B operates at a 45W base TDP and up to 115W max turbo.
- •Socket type: Product A uses BGA2833 (mobile) and LGA1851 (desktop), whereas Product B is limited to FCBGA2049.
- •Target audience: Product A targets gamers, video editors, developers, and business users; Product B targets gamers and demanding creators.
Performance
Product B reaches a higher maximum turbo boost clock of 5.4 GHz compared to Product A's 5.0 GHz.
Build quality
Not specified in the provided facts for either product.
Connectivity
Not specified in the provided facts for either product.
Power & efficiency
Product A operates at a lower base TDP of 15-25W (max boost up to 80W) compared to Product B's 45W base and 115W max turbo.
Compatibility
Product A supports mobile (BGA2833) and desktop (LGA1851) sockets, whereas Product B is limited to laptop and mobile form factors (FCBGA2049).
Price & value
Product A pricing is unknown, while Product B is positioned in a premium pricing tier for high-end systems.
Warranty & support
Not specified in the provided facts for either product.
Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 356H if…
Developers and professionals needing 32 threads, lower base power draw, and cross-platform mobile/desktop socket options.
Choose Intel Core Ultra 9 285H if…
Gamers and content creators prioritizing a higher 5.4 GHz boost clock and sustained performance up to 115W.
Common questions
How do the core and thread counts compare?
Both processors feature 16 cores, but Product A has 32 threads while Product B has 16 threads.
What are the power consumption differences?
Product A has a base TDP of 15-25W with boosts up to 80W, whereas Product B has a 45W base TDP and scales up to 115W.
What graphics do these processors include?
Both processors feature integrated Intel Arc 140T graphics, with Product B specifically noting 8 Xe-cores up to 2.35 GHz.