FindAlternative
Back to keycloak

keycloak vs logto

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
keycloak
keycloakOpen-source identity and access management for modern applications
logto
logtoModern authentication and authorization infrastructure for developers
Overview
Description

Keycloak provides single sign‑on (SSO) and identity brokering for web, mobile, and API‑based applications. It supports standard protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML, allowing seamless integration with existing user stores. The platform includes an admin console, user self‑service, and fine‑grained authorization policies, all available under an Apache 2.0 license. It can be deployed on‑premises or used as a managed service, making it suitable for both startups and large enterprises.

Logto is an open-source, developer-friendly identity solution designed for SaaS and AI applications. Built on modern standards like OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.1, it streamlines user management by offering robust out-of-the-box features. The platform enables development teams to quickly integrate secure login workflows, multi-factor authentication, and role-based access control without building complex identity systems from scratch.

Pricing
Free
Freemium
Category
Identity & SSO
Identity & SSO
Best for
Enterprises and developers
Developers and SaaS founders
Specifications
deployment
Self-hosted
Self-hosted
open source
Yes
Yes
github stars
36,057+152%
14,283
api available
Yes
Yes
support options
Community forum, GitHub issues, Red Hat support
Community, Email, GitHub
key integrations
LDAP, Active Directory, Kubernetes, Docker, Spring Boot
GitHub, Google, Microsoft, Slack
primary language
Java
TypeScript
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully open source with no licensing fees
  • Supports all major authentication standards
  • Extensible with custom providers and scripts
  • Strong community and Red Hat enterprise support
  • Built on modern open standards like OIDC and OAuth 2.1
  • Developer-friendly setup with extensive documentation
  • Comprehensive built-in support for enterprise SSO and RBAC
  • Scalable multi-tenancy architecture for modern SaaS apps
Cons
  • Initial setup can be complex for beginners
  • Admin UI may feel dated compared to newer SaaS solutions
  • Self‑hosted scaling requires operational expertise
  • Requires technical knowledge to configure and customize effectively
  • Self-hosting involves infrastructure management overhead
  • Advanced enterprise features require higher-tier plans
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to keycloak

View all →
FusionAuth
FusionAuth

Developer-friendly identity and access management platform

Compare
authentik
authentik

The authentication glue you need

Compare
WorkOS
WorkOS

Enterprise-ready auth, SSO and SCIM APIs for B2B SaaS

Compare
logto
logto

Modern authentication and authorization infrastructure for developers

Compare

Alternatives to logto

View all →
keycloak
keycloak

Open-source identity and access management for modern applications

Compare
SuperTokens
SuperTokens

Open-source authentication solution for secure user management

Compare
Auth0
Auth0

Developer-focused identity platform for authentication and authorization

Compare
authentik
authentik

The authentication glue you need

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Keycloak offers a fully free, feature‑rich, enterprise‑grade IAM platform but with a steeper learning curve, while Logto provides a more developer‑friendly, modern experience with a freemium model and easier setup.

Key differences

  • •Pricing model – Keycloak is completely free; Logto adds paid tiers for advanced features.
  • •Setup complexity – Keycloak’s initial configuration is noted as complex; Logto is described as developer‑friendly with extensive docs.
  • •Integration breadth – Keycloak lists LDAP, Active Directory, Kubernetes, Docker, Spring Boot; Logto lists only GitHub, Google, Microsoft, Slack.
  • •Support options – Keycloak includes Red Hat enterprise support; Logto offers community and email support only.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Keycloak is free; Logto uses a freemium model with paid tiers for advanced features.

keycloak

Ease of use / learning curve

Keycloak’s initial setup is described as complex; Logto is marketed as developer‑friendly with extensive documentation.

logto

Features & depth

Keycloak provides extensive SSO, LDAP/AD federation, multi‑tenant realms, and fine‑grained policies; Logto’s feature list is shorter.

keycloak

Integrations & ecosystem

Keycloak lists LDAP, Active Directory, Kubernetes, Docker, Spring Boot; Logto lists only GitHub, Google, Microsoft, Slack.

keycloak

Support

Keycloak offers community, GitHub, and Red Hat enterprise support; Logto offers community, email, and GitHub only.

keycloak

Security & privacy

Both implement OpenID Connect/OAuth standards; no differing security facts provided.

Tie

Choose keycloak if…

Enterprises needing comprehensive IAM, LDAP/AD integration, and willing to manage complex setup.

Choose logto if…

Developers or SaaS founders prioritizing quick, modern setup and are comfortable with a freemium model.

Common questions

Is there any licensing cost for either product?

Keycloak is completely free; Logto has a freemium model where advanced features may require paid plans.

Which solution is easier to get started with?

Logto is marketed as developer‑friendly with extensive docs, while Keycloak’s initial setup is noted as complex.

Do both products support LDAP/Active Directory integration?

Keycloak supports LDAP and Active Directory federation; Logto does not list those integrations.