LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer vs Whirlpool WFW5605MW Front Load Washer
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The LG WM4000HWA is a 4.5 cubic foot front-load washing machine offering TurboWash technology that cuts wash time while maintaining cleaning performance, along with built-in steam cycles for sanitizing and reducing wrinkles without a separate dryer step. SmartThinQ app connectivity lets users start, stop, and monitor cycles remotely, receive maintenance alerts, and download additional wash cycle programs directly to the machine over Wi-Fi. Allergiene cycle uses steam to remove up to 95% of common household allergens from bedding and clothing, addressing a specific need for households managing allergies, while a large capacity accommodates bigger loads like comforters.
The Whirlpool WFW5605MW Front Load Washer is designed to provide fast and efficient cleaning with its 4.5 cu ft capacity and 30-minute quick wash cycle. This washer is perfect for busy households who need to get their laundry done quickly without compromising on cleaning quality.
Around $999.99 MSRP.
- Fast TurboWash cycles
- Useful steam sanitization features
- Large capacity for big loads
- Good smart app integration
- Fast and efficient cleaning
- Large capacity
- Energy efficient
- Quiet operation
- Front-load design requires occasional gasket cleaning
- Premium price versus basic top-load washers
- Steam cycles add to cycle time and water use
- May require more maintenance than top load washers
- Some users may find the front load design difficult to use
- Not suitable for very small loads
What reviewers say
LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer Reviews
4.0 (3)Solid choice
I picked up LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer a while back and haven't looked back. Large capacity for big loads. One minor gripe: steam cycles add to cycle time and water use, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend.
Does exactly what we need
LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer has quickly become part of our daily routine. Good smart app integration. One minor gripe: premium price versus basic top-load washers, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend.
Great washing-machine
Been a regular user of LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer for a while now. Fast TurboWash cycles. One minor gripe: steam cycles add to cycle time and water use, but it hasn't been a dealbreaker. Would recommend.
Whirlpool WFW5605MW Front Load Washer Reviews
No reviews yet.
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer
View all →Smart home ecosystem connecting your Bosch kitchen and laundry devices to your mobile phone.
Efficient front-load washer with SmartBoost technology
Premium 9 kg washer with AI‑driven cycles and full app control
Fast and efficient front load washer with 30-minute quick wash cycle
Alternatives to Whirlpool WFW5605MW Front Load Washer
View all →
A large-capacity smart washing machine with steam sanitization.
High-efficiency front load washer with large capacity and quiet operation
Efficient front-load washer with SmartBoost technology
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataBoth washers have the same 4.5 cu ft capacity, but Whirlpool is the lower‑cost, quieter, energy‑star model, while LG adds smart‑app control, steam sanitization, and faster TurboWash cycles at a higher price.
Key differences
- •LG includes SmartThinQ app control; Whirlpool has no connectivity.
- •LG offers TurboWash and steam cycles for speed and sanitization; Whirlpool only lists basic cycles.
- •Whirlpool is Energy Star rated and noted for quiet operation; LG’s energy rating and noise level are not specified.
- •LG’s MSRP is around $999.99, whereas Whirlpool’s price is not given (implying likely lower).
- •Warranty is stated for Whirlpool (1 year) but not for LG.
Capacity
Both have 4.5 cu ft drums per specifications.
Energy efficiency & running cost
Whirlpool is Energy Star rated; LG’s energy rating is not specified.
Noise level
Whirlpool advertises quiet operation; LG provides no noise information.
Size & footprint
Both are front‑load washers; no dimensions are provided to differentiate.
Features
LG adds TurboWash, steam sanitization, Allergiene cycle, and SmartThinQ app; Whirlpool lists only basic cycles.
Ease of cleaning / maintenance
Both require front‑load gasket care; Whirlpool notes possible higher maintenance, LG mentions occasional gasket cleaning.
Price
LG’s MSRP is about $999.99; Whirlpool’s price is not disclosed, implying a lower cost.
Warranty
Whirlpool provides a 1‑year warranty; LG’s warranty is not specified.
Choose LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer if…
Tech‑savvy households that value app control, steam sanitization, and faster TurboWash cycles despite higher price.
Choose Whirlpool WFW5605MW Front Load Washer if…
Busy families wanting a quiet, energy‑star washer at likely lower cost, without smart features.
Common questions
Which washer is cheaper?
Whirlpool’s price is not listed but is positioned as a basic model; LG’s MSRP is around $999.99.
Do either of these washers have smart connectivity?
LG includes SmartThinQ app control; Whirlpool has no smart connectivity.
Is there a steam sanitization option?
Only the LG WM4000HWA offers steam cycles for sanitizing and wrinkle reduction.