MakerBot Method X vs Ultimaker 3
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.
The Method X delivers industrial‑grade accuracy and reliability for prototyping, education, and small‑batch production. Its heated, carbon‑fiber build chamber and dual extruders enable high‑temperature materials like ABS, Nylon, and polycarbonate with minimal warping. Designed for makerspaces and professional labs, the printer integrates seamlessly with MakerBot's cloud software, offering remote monitoring, automated bed leveling, and secure print management. The robust steel frame and enclosed design provide consistent results across a wide range of filament types.
The Ultimaker 3 is a robust, dual-extrusion desktop 3D printer engineered to deliver high uptime and seamless workflow integration for professionals and educators. It features an intelligent print core system, active filament flow monitoring, and optimized print profiles that consistently produce accurate mechanical parts and intricate visual prototypes. Equipped with automatic bed leveling and NFC-enabled material recognition, the printer streamlines setup and minimizes user intervention. Its open filament system supports a wide array of advanced thermoplastics, while water-soluble PVA support material enables the creation of complex internal geometries with clean, easy post-processing.
- High temperature, low warping prints
- Dual extrusion expands material options
- Robust, enclosed design for safety
- Integrated cloud management
- Reliable dual extrusion system with easy-to-swap print cores
- Seamless integration with Cura slicing software and material profiles
- Automatic bed leveling reduces initial setup and calibration errors
- Water-soluble support enables complex internal geometries without manual cleanup
- High upfront cost
- Large footprint requires dedicated space
- Limited filament compatibility compared to open‑source printers
- Higher price point compared to entry-level hobbyist 3D printers
- Proprietary print cores are more expensive than traditional third-party nozzles
- Enclosure is semi-open, which limits printing with advanced warp-prone industrial filaments like ABS or PC without modifications
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to MakerBot Method X
View all →A reliable dual-extrusion desktop 3D printer for professional prototyping and complex geometries.
Professional dual-extruder 3D printer engineered for reliable industrial manufacturing.
Alternatives to Ultimaker 3
View all →A reliable and advanced 3D printer designed for educators, makers, and professionals.
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataThe Ultimaker 3 offers a lower‑cost, reliable dual‑extrusion workflow with built‑in Cura integration, while the MakerBot Method X costs more but adds a high‑temp enclosed build chamber for warping‑prone materials.
Key differences
- •Price: Ultimaker 3 is $3,499 vs Method X at $6,499.
- •Enclosure: Method X has a carbon‑fiber reinforced, heated enclosure (up to 120 °C); Ultimaker 3’s enclosure is semi‑open.
- •Material handling: Method X supports high‑temp filaments like ABS, Nylon, polycarbonate; Ultimaker 3’s semi‑open design limits such filaments.
- •Footprint: Method X is larger (530 × 530 × 720 mm, 30 kg) than Ultimaker 3 (342 × 505 × 588 mm, 10.6 kg).
- •Software integration: Ultimaker 3 auto‑configures Cura via NFC; Method X uses MakerBot Print cloud software.
Pricing & value
Ultimaker 3 costs $3,499, less than half of Method X’s $6,499 price.
Performance
Method X’s heated enclosure (up to 120 °C) enables reliable printing of high‑temp, warp‑prone materials.
Build quality
Method X features a stainless‑steel frame and reinforced glass plate, indicating higher durability than Ultimaker 3’s unspecified frame.
Connectivity
Both provide Wi‑Fi, Ethernet, and USB connectivity.
Power & efficiency
Ultimaker 3’s lighter weight (10.6 kg) suggests lower power consumption than the 30 kg Method X.
Compatibility
Ultimaker 3 integrates directly with Cura and NFC material profiles, streamlining material setup.
Warranty & support
Both offer a 1‑year warranty.
Choose MakerBot Method X if…
Users requiring high‑temp, low‑warp printing (ABS, Nylon, PC) and prefer an enclosed, industrial‑grade machine.
Choose Ultimaker 3 if…
Professionals needing reliable dual extrusion on a budget, with Cura workflow and no high‑temp enclosure.
Common questions
Which printer is cheaper?
Ultimaker 3 at $3,499 vs Method X at $6,499.
Can I print ABS or Nylon reliably?
Method X’s heated enclosure supports ABS, Nylon, PETG, and polycarbonate; Ultimaker 3’s semi‑open design limits such filaments.
What software do they use for slicing?
Ultimaker 3 auto‑configures Cura via NFC; Method X uses MakerBot Print cloud‑based slicing software.