Medal of Honor vs Medal of Honor: Rising Sun
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Set during World War II, Medal of Honor puts players in the boots of an elite operative behind enemy lines, delivering a cinematic campaign filled with intense firefights and covert missions. The game balances fast‑paced shooting with stealth tactics, offering both solo and cooperative experiences across multiple platforms.
Medal of Honor: Rising Sun is a 2003 first‑person shooter set during World War II, focusing on the Pacific theater. Players assume the role of a U.S. Marine fighting across iconic battles such as Guadalcanal and Iwo Jima, with a mix of single‑player missions and cooperative multiplayer modes. The game features a blend of cinematic storytelling and intense gunplay, delivering a historically‑inspired experience on the PlayStation 2. Though its critical reception was mixed, it remains a notable entry in the Medal of Honor series for its ambitious scope and cooperative play options.
- Engaging WWII storyline
- Strong blend of stealth and action
- Varied multiplayer modes
- Authentic weapon recreation
- Engaging co‑op campaign mode
- Period‑accurate weapon variety
- Cinematic storytelling
- Varied multiplayer options
- Occasional AI glitches
- Multiplayer matchmaking can be slow
- Limited map variety
- Outdated graphics by modern standards
- AI can be inconsistent
- Mixed critical reception
More alternatives & similar tools
Alternatives to Medal of Honor
View all →
Experience the intensity of WWII combat in a classic first‑person shooter
Alternatives to Medal of Honor: Rising Sun
View all →
A gritty WWII shooter that puts you in the boots of a US Marine on the European front
The Verdict
AI-generated from listing dataMedal of Honor (2010) offers better overall quality and modern features at a higher price, while Medal of Honor: Rising Sun (2003) is cheaper but dated and less polished.
Key differences
- •Critic scores: 74/100 for B vs 40/100 for A.
- •Multiplayer capacity: B supports up to 16 players; A limited to four‑player co‑op and basic modes.
- •Release era: B (2010) has newer graphics, lighting, and weather effects; A (2003) has outdated graphics.
- •Gameplay focus: B blends stealth with action and branching missions; A emphasizes straightforward shooter combat.
- •Price: B costs $59.99; A costs $49.99.
Gameplay & fun factor
B adds stealth, branching missions, and larger multiplayer; A is a classic shooter with limited modes.
Platform availability
Both list only generic multiplayer; no platform specifics provided, so they are equal.
Price & value
A is $10 cheaper ($49.99 vs $59.99) while offering comparable core shooter experience.
Multiplayer / co‑op
B supports up to 16 players and includes both competitive and co‑op modes; A caps at four players.
Content & replayability
B’s branching narrative, progression system, and larger map pool give more replay value than A.
Difficulty & accessibility
Both have similar age ratings (T vs M) and no specific difficulty data, making them comparable.
Graphics & performance
B features dynamic lighting, weather, and newer engine (2010); A’s graphics are outdated by modern standards.
Choose Medal of Honor if…
Buyers seeking richer gameplay, better multiplayer, and newer graphics, and willing to pay more.
Choose Medal of Honor: Rising Sun if…
Buyers on a tighter budget who want a straightforward WWII shooter without modern frills.
Common questions
Is the co‑op experience better in one game?
B offers larger co‑op sessions (up to 16 players) and integrated voice chat; A limits co‑op to four players.
Which game has higher critical reception?
Medal of Honor (2010) scores 74/100; Medal of Honor: Rising Sun (2003) scores 40/100.
Do both games support stealth gameplay?
Only B includes dedicated stealth mechanics and silent weapons; A focuses on conventional shooter combat.






