FindAlternative
Back to Platform.sh

Platform.sh vs Upsun

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Platform.sh
Platform.shEnterprise‑grade PaaS for automated CI/CD and scalable cloud hosting
Upsun
UpsunManaged PaaS for per-branch preview environments
Overview
Description

Platform.sh is a fully managed Platform-as-a-Service that lets developers push code via Git and have complete, isolated environments built automatically for each branch. It supports a wide range of runtimes and databases, handling provisioning, scaling, and deployment without manual server work. The service provides zero‑downtime releases, built‑in CI/CD pipelines, and global CDN integration, making it ideal for complex web applications, micro‑services, and SaaS products that need reliable, repeatable deployments across multiple regions.

Upsun is a managed platform-as-a-service (PaaS) designed for web development teams, DevOps teams, e-commerce businesses, and agile development teams. It provides per-branch preview environments, allowing teams to test and review their code changes in a production-like environment before deploying to production.

Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Category
Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Best for
Enterprises and SaaS teams
Web development teams and DevOps teams
Specifications
free tier
No
No
uptime sla
99.99%
99.99%
datacenter regions
US, EU, APAC
US, EU, APAC
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Fully automated environment creation per Git branch
  • Strong support for many runtimes and databases
  • Zero‑downtime deployments and instant rollbacks
  • Global CDN and multi‑region availability
  • Automated deployment and preview environment creation
  • Scalable infrastructure and high availability
  • Support for multiple programming languages and frameworks
  • Integrates with popular CI/CD tools
Cons
  • Higher cost compared to basic shared hosting
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced configuration
  • Limited free tier; only a trial is available
  • Limited customization options for preview environments
  • Additional costs for large teams or high-traffic applications
  • Steep learning curve for new users
  • Limited support for legacy applications
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Platform.sh

View all →
Railway
Railway

Deploy code without manual infrastructure work

Compare
Upsun
Upsun

Managed PaaS for per-branch preview environments

Compare
Sanity
Sanity

Hosted headless content platform with real‑time datastore and customizable editor

Compare
Northflank
Northflank

Deploy containers, jobs and databases on any cloud in minutes

Compare

Alternatives to Upsun

View all →
Scalingo
Scalingo

European PaaS that deploys apps from Git with managed databases and auto‑scaling.

Compare
Platform.sh
Platform.sh

Enterprise‑grade PaaS for automated CI/CD and scalable cloud hosting

Compare
Render
Render

The unified cloud platform to build, deploy, and scale apps and websites.

Compare
Railway
Railway

Deploy code without manual infrastructure work

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both Upsun and Platform.sh offer enterprise‑grade PaaS with 99.99% SLA and global regions, but Platform.sh provides broader runtime support and built‑in CI/CD, while Upsun focuses on automated preview environments with simpler integration.

Key differences

  • •Platform.sh supports over 30 runtimes and databases; Upsun lists only a few (Node.js, Python).
  • •Platform.sh includes built‑in CI/CD pipelines and instant rollbacks; Upsun relies on external CI/CD tool integration.
  • •Upsun emphasizes per‑branch preview environments as a core feature; Platform.sh offers full environment creation per branch but with broader automation.
  • •Platform.sh provides an integrated global CDN; Upsun does not mention CDN services.
  • •Both have similar SLA and region coverage, but Upsun notes limited customization for preview environments.
DimensionWinner

Pricing & value

Both are paid subscription services with no free tier; pricing details not provided, so value cannot be distinguished.

Tie

Uptime & reliability

Both guarantee 99.99% SLA and offer US, EU, APAC datacenters.

Tie

Performance

Platform.sh mentions automatic horizontal scaling and integrated CDN for faster delivery; Upsun only notes scalable infrastructure.

Platform.sh

Developer experience

Platform.sh offers built‑in CI/CD, zero‑downtime deployments, and instant rollbacks; Upsun requires external CI/CD tools.

Platform.sh

Regions & compliance

Both provide deployments in US, EU, and APAC regions.

Tie

Support & customization

Upsun highlights automated preview environments but notes limited customization; Platform.sh has steeper learning curve for advanced config.

Upsun

Lock‑in

Platform.sh’s extensive runtime/database support and built‑in pipelines may increase lock‑in compared to Upsun’s lighter integration approach.

Platform.sh

Choose Platform.sh if…

Enterprises or SaaS teams requiring broad runtime/database support, built‑in CI/CD, CDN, and advanced scaling.

Choose Upsun if…

Teams needing quick per‑branch preview environments with simple CI/CD integration and tolerating limited runtime options.

Common questions

Which platform supports more programming languages and databases?

Platform.sh supports over 30 runtimes and databases; Upsun lists only Node.js and Python.

Do both services include built‑in CI/CD pipelines?

Platform.sh includes built‑in CI/CD pipelines; Upsun integrates with external tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, CircleCI.

Is there a free tier or trial available?

Both products state no free tier; Platform.sh offers only a trial, Upsun offers none.