FindAlternative
Back to Rock Pi 4

Rock Pi 4 vs BeagleBone Black

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing
BeagleBone Black
BeagleBone BlackA powerful, community-supported open-source development board for makers and engineers.
Overview
Description

The Rock Pi 4 is a compact single-board computer featuring a hexa‑core Rockchip RK3399 processor, up to 4 GB LPDDR4 RAM, and dual‑channel M.2 NVMe support. It offers a rich I/O set including dual HDMI 4K, USB‑C 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet, and Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth for versatile connectivity. Designed for developers, makers, and edge‑AI projects, the board runs Linux, Android, and various open‑source OSes, providing a flexible platform for everything from media servers to AI inference workloads.

The BeagleBone Black is a low-cost, community-supported development platform featuring an AM335x 1GHz ARM Cortex-A8 processor. It runs full-featured Linux distributions and offers extensive expansion capabilities through dual 46-pin headers. Designed for hobbyists, educators, and embedded developers, the board integrates 512MB of DDR3 RAM and 4GB of on-board eMMC flash storage preloaded with Debian. Its unique Programmable Real-Time Unit (PRU) subsystems allow for deterministic, low-latency real-time I/O operations.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
ARM Single-Board Computers
ARM Single-Board Computers
Best for
Developers and AI hobbyists
Embedded developers and hardware hobbyists
Specifications
General
msrp
$99
$6534%
Specifications
weight
55 g+38%
40g
warranty
1 year
1 year
dimensions
85 x 56 x 14 mm+888%
8.6 x 5.4 cm
open source
Yes
Yes
connectivity
Wi‑Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB‑C 3.0, USB‑A 3.0, HDMI 2.0
10/100 Ethernet, USB 2.0 Host, USB Client
power source
USB Powered
USB Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High‑performance RK3399 CPU
  • M.2 NVMe slot for fast storage
  • Dual 4K HDMI outputs
  • Strong community and open‑source support
  • Full open-source hardware design with accessible schematics
  • Dual PRU coprocessors allow for real-time operations
  • Pre-flashed Debian Linux on built-in eMMC storage
  • Vibrant community and extensive documentation available
Cons
  • Wi‑Fi limited to 802.11ac (no Wi‑Fi 6)
  • Limited official Android builds
  • Power consumption higher than low‑end SBCs
  • Lacks built-in wireless connectivity like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
  • Only 512MB of RAM limits heavy multi-threaded applications
  • Can be more difficult for absolute beginners compared to Arduino
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Rock Pi 4

View all →
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
NVIDIA Jetson Nano

A small, powerful AI computer for makers, learners, and embedded developers.

Compare
BeagleBone Black
BeagleBone Black

A powerful, community-supported open-source development board for makers and engineers.

Compare
Google Coral Dev Board
Google Coral Dev Board

A single-board computer with a removable system-on-module for edge AI applications.

Compare
ODROID-C4
ODROID-C4

A high-performance quad-core single board computer built for power efficiency.

Compare

Alternatives to BeagleBone Black

View all →
Banana Pi
Banana Pi

Versatile open-source single-board computers for IoT, routing, and STEM.

Compare
Radxa Rock 3A
Radxa Rock 3A

A high-performance single-board computer powered by the Rockchip RK3568 processor.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4

Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing

Compare
Teensy 4.1
Teensy 4.1

A high-performance ARM Cortex-M7 development board designed for demanding embedded applications.

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

The BeagleBone Black is a low‑cost, open‑hardware SBC ideal for real‑time and Ethernet‑centric projects, while the Rock Pi 4 offers far higher CPU power, more RAM, Wi‑Fi, and NVMe storage for AI and multimedia workloads at a higher price.

Key differences

  • CPU: 1 GHz single‑core Cortex‑A8 vs. up to 2 GHz hexa‑core RK3399
  • RAM: 512 MB DDR3 vs. up to 4 GB LPDDR4
  • Storage: 4 GB eMMC on board vs. optional eMMC plus M.2 NVMe slot
  • Connectivity: Ethernet only vs. Gigabit Ethernet, Wi‑Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0
  • Video output: single HDMI vs. dual 4K HDMI ports
DimensionWinner

Performance

Rock Pi 4’s hexa‑core RK3399 up to 2 GHz and up to 4 GB RAM far outpace BeagleBone Black’s 1 GHz single core and 512 MB RAM.

Rock Pi 4

Build quality

Both are open‑source SBCs with similar dimensions and weight; no specific build‑quality differences given.

Tie

Connectivity

Rock Pi 4 includes Wi‑Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB‑C 3.0 and dual HDMI; BeagleBone Black only has 10/100 Ethernet and USB 2.0.

Rock Pi 4

Power & efficiency

BeagleBone Black’s simpler 1 GHz CPU and lower RAM likely consume less power than Rock Pi 4’s high‑performance RK3399.

BeagleBone Black

Compatibility

BeagleBone Black ships with Debian Linux pre‑flashed and strong community support for embedded Linux; Rock Pi 4 supports Linux and Android but fewer official Android builds.

BeagleBone Black

Price & value

BeagleBone Black costs $65 versus Rock Pi 4’s $99, offering a lower entry cost for basic projects.

BeagleBone Black

Warranty & support

Both provide a 1‑year warranty; community support levels are comparable per the facts.

Tie

Choose Rock Pi 4 if…

AI hobbyists or developers requiring high CPU power, more RAM, Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth, NVMe storage, and dual 4K video.

Choose BeagleBone Black if…

Embedded developers needing real‑time I/O, Ethernet, and a low‑cost, fully open‑hardware board.

Common questions

Which board is cheaper?

BeagleBone Black is $65 MSRP, while Rock Pi 4 is $99 MSRP.

Do either boards have built‑in Wi‑Fi?

BeagleBone Black has no built‑in Wi‑Fi; Rock Pi 4 includes 802.11ac Wi‑Fi and Bluetooth 5.0.

Can I run real‑time tasks on both?

BeagleBone Black has two PRU coprocessors for deterministic real‑time operations; Rock Pi 4 does not list dedicated real‑time hardware.