FindAlternative
Back to Rock Pi 4

Rock Pi 4 vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, ratings, and alternatives.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
NVIDIA Jetson NanoA small, powerful AI computer for makers, learners, and embedded developers.
Overview
Description

The Rock Pi 4 is a compact single-board computer featuring a hexa‑core Rockchip RK3399 processor, up to 4 GB LPDDR4 RAM, and dual‑channel M.2 NVMe support. It offers a rich I/O set including dual HDMI 4K, USB‑C 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet, and Wi‑Fi/Bluetooth for versatile connectivity. Designed for developers, makers, and edge‑AI projects, the board runs Linux, Android, and various open‑source OSes, providing a flexible platform for everything from media servers to AI inference workloads.

The NVIDIA Jetson Nano Developer Kit delivers the compute performance to run modern AI workloads in a small, power-efficient form factor. It brings the power of modern artificial intelligence to edge devices, empowering developers to build autonomous machines and smart devices. Equipped with a 128-core Maxwell GPU and a quad-core ARM CPU, it supports high-resolution sensors and processes multiple neural networks concurrently. Backed by the comprehensive Jetson software stack, it streamlines the development and deployment of advanced robotics and IoT applications.

Pricing
Paid (One-time)
Paid (One-time)
Category
ARM Single-Board Computers
ARM Single-Board Computers
Best for
Developers and AI hobbyists
Hobbyists, students, and embedded AI developers
Specifications
General
msrp
$99
$99
Specifications
weight
55 g
140g+155%
warranty
1 year
1 year
dimensions
85 x 56 x 14 mm
100 mm x 80 mm x 29 mm+18%
open source
Yes
No
connectivity
Wi‑Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB‑C 3.0, USB‑A 3.0, HDMI 2.0
Gigabit Ethernet, M.2 Key E (for wireless), USB 3.0, USB 2.0
power source
USB Powered
AC Powered
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • High‑performance RK3399 CPU
  • M.2 NVMe slot for fast storage
  • Dual 4K HDMI outputs
  • Strong community and open‑source support
  • Affordable entry point for edge AI development
  • Comprehensive software stack via JetPack SDK
  • Compact form factor with versatile I/O interfaces
  • Active developer community with extensive tutorials
Cons
  • Wi‑Fi limited to 802.11ac (no Wi‑Fi 6)
  • Limited official Android builds
  • Power consumption higher than low‑end SBCs
  • Limited onboard memory compared to higher-end Jetson models
  • Discontinued official production affecting long-term availability
  • Power supply requirements can be strict under heavy loads
Community & Metrics
Upvotes
0
0
User rating
Not enough data
Not enough data

More alternatives & similar tools

Alternatives to Rock Pi 4

View all →
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
NVIDIA Jetson Nano

A small, powerful AI computer for makers, learners, and embedded developers.

Compare
BeagleBone Black
BeagleBone Black

A powerful, community-supported open-source development board for makers and engineers.

Compare
Google Coral Dev Board
Google Coral Dev Board

A single-board computer with a removable system-on-module for edge AI applications.

Compare
ODROID-C4
ODROID-C4

A high-performance quad-core single board computer built for power efficiency.

Compare

Alternatives to NVIDIA Jetson Nano

View all →
Raspberry Pi 4 Model B
Raspberry Pi 4 Model B

A powerful credit-card-sized computer designed for makers, educators, and hobbyists.

Compare
Rock Pi 4
Rock Pi 4

Powerful SBC with RK3399 for AI and edge computing

Compare
Google Coral Dev Board
Google Coral Dev Board

A single-board computer with a removable system-on-module for edge AI applications.

Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Ultimate 4K gaming performance with ray tracing and AI acceleration

Compare

The Verdict

AI-generated from listing data

Both boards cost the same, but the Jetson Nano excels for AI edge projects with NVIDIA GPU support, while the Rock Pi 4 offers broader general‑purpose performance and more open‑source flexibility.

Key differences

  • Jetson Nano includes a 128‑core Maxwell GPU (47 GFLOPS) for AI workloads; Rock Pi 4 relies on CPU only.
  • Rock Pi 4 provides up to 4 GB LPDDR4 RAM and an M.2 NVMe slot; Jetson Nano’s memory is limited and not specified.
  • Jetson Nano uses Gigabit Ethernet and optional M.2 Key E for wireless; Rock Pi 4 has built‑in Wi‑Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0.
  • Power source differs: Jetson Nano requires AC power (5 W low‑power); Rock Pi 4 runs from USB‑C power.
  • Open‑source support: Rock Pi 4 is fully open‑source; Jetson Nano is not.
DimensionWinner

Performance

Jetson Nano’s 128‑core GPU delivers 47 GFLOPS for AI, surpassing Rock Pi 4’s CPU‑only performance.

NVIDIA Jetson Nano

Build quality

Rock Pi 4 is lighter (55 g vs 140 g) and thinner, indicating a more compact build.

Rock Pi 4

Connectivity

Rock Pi 4 includes built‑in Wi‑Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, dual 4K HDMI, and USB‑C; Jetson Nano lacks native Wi‑Fi.

Rock Pi 4

Power & efficiency

Jetson Nano consumes as little as 5 W, whereas Rock Pi 4’s USB‑C power draw is higher.

NVIDIA Jetson Nano

Compatibility

Rock Pi 4 runs mainline Linux, Android, and offers open‑source drivers; Jetson Nano relies on NVIDIA JetPack SDK.

Rock Pi 4

Price & value

Both list MSRP at $99.

Tie

Warranty & support

Both provide a 1‑year warranty.

Tie

Choose Rock Pi 4 if…

Developers wanting a versatile SBC with more RAM, NVMe storage, and open‑source Linux support.

Choose NVIDIA Jetson Nano if…

AI hobbyists needing GPU‑accelerated inference on a low‑power edge device.

Common questions

Which board supports AI acceleration out of the box?

Jetson Nano includes a 128‑core Maxwell GPU (47 GFLOPS) and NVIDIA JetPack SDK for AI workloads.

Can I add fast storage like an NVMe SSD?

Rock Pi 4 has an M.2 NGFF slot for NVMe SSDs; Jetson Nano does not list an NVMe slot.

Do both boards have built‑in Wi‑Fi?

Rock Pi 4 includes Wi‑Fi 5 (802.11ac) and Bluetooth 5.0; Jetson Nano requires an external adapter via M.2 Key E.